2010 Toledo

8–⁠5 (7–⁠1 Mid-American Conference), coached by Tim Beckman.

Schedule and results

Toledo in 2010, game by game: lost vs. Arizona 2–41; won at Ohio 20–13; won at Western Michigan 37–24; won at Purdue 31–20; lost vs. Wyoming 15–20; lost at No. 4 Boise State 14–57; won vs. Kent State 34–21; won vs. Ball State 31–24; won at Eastern Michigan 42–7; lost at Northern Illinois 30–65; won vs. Bowling Green 33–14; won vs. Central Michigan 42–31; lost vs. Florida International 32–34+35−43Lost 2–41 vs. Arizona-39ArizonaWon 20–13 at Ohio+7OhioWon 37–24 at Western Michigan+13Western MichiganWon 31–20 at Purdue+11PurdueLost 15–20 vs. Wyoming-5WyomingLost 14–57 at No. 4 Boise State-43No. 4 Boise StateWon 34–21 vs. Kent State+13Kent StateWon 31–24 vs. Ball State+7Ball StateWon 42–7 at Eastern Michigan+35Eastern MichiganLost 30–65 at Northern Illinois-35Northern Illino…Won 33–14 vs. Bowling Green+19Bowling GreenWon 42–31 vs. Central Michigan+11Central MichiganLost 32–34 vs. Florida International-2Florida Interna…
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Lost to Florida International 34–⁠32 in the Little Caesars Bowl; unranked in the final AP poll; tied for 2nd in the Mid-American Conference.

In program history: The 41st-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 75 on file).

Record
8–⁠5
Conference
7–⁠1 tied for 2nd in Mid-American Conference
AP final
Unranked
Points
363–⁠371
Coach
Tim Beckman
Elo
1496 +94 this season
SP+ rating
-5.5 No. 78 of 120; offense No. 77, defense No. 63, special teams No. 114
SRS
−4.8 No. 77 of 120 in FBS
Recruiting class
No. 87

How good, play by play

  • Offense96th of 120
  • Defense36th of 120
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted109th of 120
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted46th of 120
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense-0.0137%0.9696th of 120
Defense0.0143%0.8036th of 120
Opponent-adjusted0.01 off
0.04 def
37% off
44% def
—109th off
46th def
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense-0.1own 323% allowed
Defense0.1own 333% caused

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. From CollegeFootballData.com.

Player leaders are hidden for this season: our source’s player stats for Toledo are missing players (they add up to less than 85% of the team’s passing or rushing yards).

Top recruits in the 2010 class

Jayrone Elliott WDE★★★No. 887
David Fluellen RB★★★No. 954
Cassius McDowell WR★★★No. 1185
James Gordon OLB★★★No. 1185
John James CB★★★No. 1435

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2010 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks22.50.811
Running backs13.00.858
Receivers22.50.814
Offensive line33.00.815
Defensive line42.80.818
Linebackers32.30.802
Defensive backs32.70.813
Whole class182.70.815

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Roster 102

The 2010 roster

102 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2010 line; 32 have a stat line. See the roster

2010 Mid-American Conference standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
Northern Illinois8–⁠011–⁠3
Miami (OH)7–⁠110–⁠4
Toledo7–⁠18–⁠5
Ohio6–⁠28–⁠5
Temple5–⁠38–⁠4
Western Michigan5–⁠36–⁠6
Kent State4–⁠45–⁠7
Ball State3–⁠54–⁠8
Central Michigan2–⁠63–⁠9
Eastern Michigan2–⁠62–⁠10
Buffalo1–⁠72–⁠10
Bowling Green1–⁠72–⁠10
Akron1–⁠71–⁠11

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.