Texas Southern football money

In 2024-25, Texas Southern football brought in $2.8 million and spent $2.8 million, the 111th-most revenue of 122 FCS programs. That’s $550,000 for each of its 5 wins. 120 players were on the roster, with 13 assistant coaches.

Revenue and expenses

2012: revenue $2.7 million2012: expenses $2.7 million’122013: revenue $2.5 million2013: expenses $2.5 million2014: revenue $2.3 million2014: expenses $2.6 million’142015: revenue $3.0 million2015: expenses $3.0 million2016: revenue $2.9 million2016: expenses $2.9 million’162017: revenue $2.7 million2017: expenses $2.7 million2018: revenue $2.9 million2018: expenses $2.9 million’182019: revenue $3.0 million2019: expenses $3.8 million2020: revenue $3.0 million2020: expenses $3.0 million’202021: revenue $4.0 million2021: expenses $4.0 million2022: revenue $4.0 million2022: expenses $4.1 million’222023: revenue $3.4 million2023: expenses $3.5 million2024: revenue $2.8 million2024: expenses $2.8 million’24

Revenue Expenses (top: $4.1M)

Beside the Southwestern Athletic Conference, 2024-25

10th of 12 in revenue
  1. Alabama A&M$5.1M / $4.4M
  2. Grambling$5.0M / $5.0M
  3. Alabama State$4.9M / $4.9M
  4. Florida A&M$4.6M / $3.5M
  5. Bethune-Cookman$4.6M / $4.6M
  6. Alcorn State$4.0M / $4.0M
  7. Prairie View A&M$3.6M / $3.6M
  8. Southern$3.5M / $3.2M
  9. Jackson State$3.3M / $3.3M
  10. Texas Southern$2.8M / $2.8M
  11. Arkansas–Pine Bluff$2.1M / $2.1M
  12. Mississippi Valley State$1.5M / $1.5M

Each member’s football revenue (the thick bar) and expenses (the thin one under it) that year, as the schools reported them; schools count revenue differently.

Against the SWAC

revenue, 2012-13 to 2024-25
  1. Alabama A&M

    $5.1M in 24–⁠25

  2. Grambling

    $5.0M in 24–⁠25

  3. Alabama State

    $4.9M in 24–⁠25

  4. Florida A&M

    $4.6M in 24–⁠25

  5. Bethune-Cookman

    $4.6M in 24–⁠25

  6. Alcorn State

    $4.0M in 24–⁠25

  7. Prairie View A&M

    $3.6M in 24–⁠25

  8. Southern

    $3.5M in 24–⁠25

  9. Jackson State

    $3.3M in 24–⁠25

  10. Texas Southern

    $2.8M in 24–⁠25

  11. Arkansas–Pine Bluff

    $2.1M in 24–⁠25

  12. Mississippi Valley State

    $1.5M in 24–⁠25

Each program’s football revenue by season, as each school reports it (EADA), on one scale (top: $6.5M), for the programs in the SWAC this season, most revenue first; Texas Southern in its color.

By season

SeasonRevenueExpensesRecordSpent a winRankRosterAssistants
2024-25$2.8M$2.8M5–⁠6$0.6M111 of 12212013
2023-24$3.4M$3.5M3–⁠8$1.2M102 of 12010310
2022-23$4.0M$4.1M5–⁠6$0.8M82 of 1221147
2021-22$4.0M$4.0M2–⁠8$2.0M74 of 1191048
2020-21$3.0M$3.0M1–⁠2$3.0M76 of 1011127
2019-20$3.0M$3.8M0–⁠1194 of 1171007
2018-19$2.9M$2.9M1–⁠9$2.9M100 of 1151007
2017-18$2.7M$2.7M2–⁠9$1.4M97 of 1131047
2016-17$2.9M$2.9M4–⁠7$0.7M90 of 1131027
2015-16$3.0M$3.0M2–⁠6$1.5M78 of 113807
2014-15$2.3M$2.6M5–⁠6$0.5M97 of 112888
2013-14$2.5M$2.5M2–⁠8$1.3M89 of 112859
2012-13$2.7M$2.7M2–⁠9$1.4M73 of 1148210

As Texas Southern University reports them to the US Department of Education under the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act (ope.ed.gov/athletics). Schools count revenue differently (some include institutional support), so compare with care. “Spent a win” is the year’s football expenses over that season’s wins. Rank is football revenue among programs in the same division that season. Browse every school’s in the data.