2004 Southern Miss

7–⁠5 (5–⁠3 Conference USA), coached by Jeff Bower.

Schedule and results

Southern Miss in 2004, game by game: won at Nebraska 21–17; won at Tulane 32–14; won at South Florida 27–20; won vs. Houston 35–29; lost at Alabama 3–27; won vs. East Carolina 51–10; lost vs. Cincinnati 24–52; lost at Memphis 26–30; lost at TCU 17–42; won vs. UAB 26–21; lost vs. No. 4 California 16–26; won vs. North Texas 31–10+41−28Won 21–17 at Nebraska+4NebraskaWon 32–14 at Tulane+18TulaneWon 27–20 at South Florida+7South FloridaWon 35–29 vs. Houston+6HoustonLost 3–27 at Alabama-24AlabamaWon 51–10 vs. East Carolina+41East CarolinaLost 24–52 vs. Cincinnati-28CincinnatiLost 26–30 at Memphis-4MemphisLost 17–42 at TCU-25TCUWon 26–21 vs. UAB+5UABLost 16–26 vs. No. 4 California-10No. 4 CaliforniaWon 31–10 vs. North Texas+21North Texas
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.
DateOpponentResultElo
Sep 11atNebraskaW 21–⁠1735%
Sep 25atTulaneW 32–⁠1462%
Oct 2atSouth FloridaW 27–⁠2054%
Oct 7vsHoustonW 35–⁠2982%
Oct 16atAlabamaL 3–⁠2754%
Oct 23vsEast CarolinaW 51–⁠1087%
Nov 6vsCincinnatiL 24–⁠5270%
Nov 12atMemphisL 26–⁠3046%
Nov 20atTCUL 17–⁠4245%
Nov 27vsUABW 26–⁠2158%
Dec 4vs4CaliforniaL 16–⁠2630%
Dec 14vsNorth TexasNew Orleans BowlW 31–⁠1046%

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Beat North Texas 31–⁠10 in the New Orleans Bowl; unranked in the final AP poll; tied for 2nd in the Conference USA.

In program history: The 21st-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 90 on file).

AP poll, week by week

  1. Wk 8: 24
  2. Wk 10: 25
  3. Wk 11: 21
Record
7–⁠5
Conference
5–⁠3 tied for 2nd in Conference USA
AP final
Unranked peak No. 21
Points
309–⁠298
Coach
Jeff Bower
Elo
1542 −16 this season
SP+ rating
-0.7 No. 68 of 120; offense No. 69, defense No. 63
SRS
−2.0 No. 71 of 119 in Division I-A
Recruiting class
No. 65
Offensive coordinator
Rip Scherer
Defensive coordinator
Tyrone Nix
Offense
Pro-style
Defense
3–⁠4

How good, play by play

  • Offense42nd of 118
  • Defense43rd of 118
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense-0.0430%1.1242nd of 118
Defense-0.0738%0.9843rd of 118
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense-0.3own 272% allowed
Defense0.0own 313% caused

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. From CollegeFootballData.com.

Top recruits in the 2004 class

Cole Mason FB★★No. 831
Shawn Nelson WR★★No. 979
Cedrick Jones WDE★★No. 979
Wesley Housley OG★★No. 979
Dustin Danzle S★★No. 979

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2004 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Running backs32.00.767
Receivers22.00.756
Offensive line22.00.767
Defensive line22.00.756
Defensive backs12.00.767
Athletes and specialists12.00.767
Whole class112.00.763

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Drafted in 2005

The 2005 draft
Rd 5Michael Boley LBAtlanta Falcons
Rd 7Jeremy Parquet OTKansas City Chiefs

2004 Conference USA standings

TeamConf.OverallAP final
Louisville8–⁠011–⁠16
Memphis5–⁠38–⁠4
UAB5–⁠37–⁠5
Southern Miss5–⁠37–⁠5
Cincinnati5–⁠37–⁠5
TCU3–⁠55–⁠6
Tulane3–⁠55–⁠6
South Florida3–⁠54–⁠7
Houston3–⁠53–⁠8
Army2–⁠62–⁠9
East Carolina2–⁠62–⁠9

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.