
2022 Oregon
10–3 (7–2 Pac-12), coached by Dan Lanning, finished No. 15 in the AP poll. Share
Schedule and results
- Best winBeat No. 9 UCLA 45–30Oct 22
Over the best-ranked team it beat, at home.
- Most excitingLost to No. 24 Washington 34–37Nov 12
The win probability swung the most, by CollegeFootballData.com’s excitement index.
| Date | Opponent | Result | Elo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3 | vs | L 3–49 | 28% |
| Sep 10 | vs | W 70–14 | 73% |
| Sep 17 | vs | W 41–20 | 48% |
| Sep 24 | at | W 44–41 | 47% |
| Oct 1 | vs | W 45–27 | 84% |
| Oct 8 | at | W 49–22 | 71% |
| Oct 22 | vs | W 45–30 | 58% |
| Oct 29 | at | W 42–24 | 72% |
| Nov 5 | at | W 49–10 | 84% |
| Nov 12 | vs | L 34–37 | 75% |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 20–17 | 55% |
| Nov 26 | at | L 34–38 | 53% |
| Dec 28Bowls & playoff | vs | W 28–27 | 66% |
Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.
How it ended: Beat North Carolina 28–27 in the Holiday Bowl; No. 15 in the final AP poll; tied for 2nd in the Pac-12.
In program history: The 16th-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 109 on file).
AP poll, week by week
- Wk 1: 11
- Wk 3: 25
- Wk 4: 15
- Wk 5: 13
- Wk 6: 12
- Wk 7: 12
- Wk 8: 10
- Wk 9: 8
- Wk 10: 8
- Wk 11: 6
- Wk 12: 12
- Wk 13: 10
- Wk 14: 15
- Wk 15: 15
- Final: 15
- Record
- 10–3
- Conference
- 7–2 tied for 2nd in Pac-12
- AP final
- No. 15 peak No. 6
- Points
- 504–356
- Coach
- Dan Lanning
- Elo
- 1679 +99 this season
- SP+ rating
- 18.9 No. 11 of 131; offense No. 5, defense No. 65, special teams No. 46
- SRS
- 14.2 No. 13 of 131 in FBS
- Returning
- 17% of last season’s EPA, No. 126 of 130
- Recruiting class
- No. 13 roster talent No. 7 in FBS
- Offensive coordinators
- Kenny Dillingham and Junior Adams
- Defensive coordinators
- Tosh Lupoi and Matt Powledge
- Offense
- Spread option
- Defense
- 3–4
How good, play by play
| EPA per play | Success | Explosiveness | FBS rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 0.26 | 53% | 1.12 | 7th of 131 |
| Defense | 0.11 | 45% | 1.27 | 66th of 131 |
| Opponent-adjusted | 0.22 off 0.07 def | 51% off 42% def | — | 13th off 45th def |
How these are measured
Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played.
Drives and havoc
| Points per trip inside the 40 | Average start | Havoc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 4.4 | own 30 | 11% allowed |
| Defense | 4.2 | own 30 | 15% caused |
CORE rating 14.8, 12th of 131 (offense 14.0, defense -0.8).
A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.
Leaders
| Passing yards | Bo Nix QB | 3,594 yds |
| Passing touchdowns | Bo Nix QB | 29 TD |
| Rushing yards | Mar’Keise Irving RB | 1,052 yds |
| Rushing touchdowns | Bo Nix QB | 14 TD |
| Receiving yards | Troy Franklin WR | 891 yds |
| Receiving touchdowns | Troy Franklin WR | 9 TD |
| Tackles | Bennett Williams DB | 67 tkl |
| Sacks | D.J. Johnson LB | 6 sacks |
| Interceptions | Christian Gonzalez DB | 4 INT |
Top recruits in the 2022 class
| Josh Conerly Jr. OT | ★★★★★ | No. 16 |
| Devon Jackson LB | ★★★★ | No. 140 |
| Jalil Tucker CB | ★★★★ | No. 145 |
| Kyler Kasper WR | ★★★★ | No. 150 |
| Jahlil Florence CB | ★★★★ | No. 157 |
| Dave Iuli OL | ★★★★ | No. 191 |
| Jordan James RB | ★★★★ | No. 196 |
| Trejon Williams S | ★★★★ | No. 363 |
247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.
The 2022 class by position
| Signed | Stars | Rating | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quarterbacks | 1 | 3.0 | 0.800 |
| Running backs | 2 | 3.5 | 0.861 |
| Receivers | 1 | 4.0 | 0.940 |
| Offensive line | 4 | 3.8 | 0.915 |
| Defensive line | 3 | 3.3 | 0.879 |
| Linebackers | 2 | 4.0 | 0.918 |
| Defensive backs | 4 | 4.0 | 0.917 |
| Athletes and specialists | 3 | 3.0 | 0.854 |
| Whole class | 20 | 3.6 | 0.892 |
High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.
Drafted in 2023
The 2023 draft| Rd 1 | Christian Gonzalez CB | New England Patriots |
| Rd 3 | D.J. Johnson OLB | Carolina Panthers |
| Rd 5 | Noah Sewell ILB | Chicago Bears |
| Rd 6 | Malaesala Aumavae-Laulu OT | Baltimore Ravens |
| Rd 7 | Jordon Riley DT | New York Giants |
| Rd 7 | Alex Forsyth C | Denver Broncos |
Roster 127
The 2022 roster127 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2022 line; 67 have a stat line. See the roster
Transfers in 10
The 2022 portal| ★★★★ | from | |
| ★★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★★ | from | |
| from |
Transfers out 17
| ★★★★ | to | |
| ★★★★ | to | |
| ★★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | no new school on file | |
| ★★★ | no new school on file | |
| ★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | to |
And 5 more, lower-rated or unrated.
2022 Pac-12 standings
| Team | Conf. | Overall | AP final |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8–1 | 11–3 | 12 | |
| 7–2 | 11–2 | 8 | |
| 7–2 | 10–3 | 15 | |
| 7–2 | 10–4 | 10 | |
| 6–3 | 10–3 | 17 | |
| 6–3 | 9–4 | 21 | |
| 4–5 | 7–6 | ||
| 3–6 | 5–7 | ||
| 2–7 | 4–8 | ||
| 2–7 | 3–9 | ||
| 1–8 | 3–9 | ||
| 1–8 | 1–11 |
Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.