2026 Oklahoma

3–⁠3 (1–⁠2 Southeastern Conference), coached by Brent Venables. The season’s Wikipedia article records 3–⁠2, over five games to the six on file here.

Schedule and results

Oklahoma in 2026, game by game: won vs. UTEP 51–0; lost at Michigan 10–17; won vs. New Mexico 14–6; lost at No. 2 Georgia 13–41; won vs. No. 1 Texas 27–24; lost vs. No. 15 Kentucky 13–21+51−28Won 51–0 vs. UTEP+51UTEPLost 10–17 at Michigan-7MichiganWon 14–6 vs. New Mexico+8New MexicoLost 13–41 at No. 2 Georgia-28No. 2 GeorgiaWon 27–24 vs. No. 1 Texas+3No. 1 TexasLost 13–21 vs. No. 15 Kentucky-8No. 15 Kentucky
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below; orange marks an upset win.
DateOpponentResultElo
Sep 4vsUTEPW 51–⁠086%
Sep 12atMichiganL 10–⁠1744%
Sep 19vsNew MexicoW 14–⁠663%
Sep 26at2GeorgiaL 13–⁠4127%
Oct 10vs1TexasW 27–⁠2433%
Oct 17vs15KentuckyL 13–⁠2165%
Oct 24atMississippi StatePreview52%
Oct 31vsSouth CarolinaPreview65%
Nov 7atFloridaPreview47%
Nov 14vsOle MissPreview38%
Nov 21vsTexas A&MPreview58%
Nov 28atMissouriPreview37%

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

AP poll, week by week

  1. Wk 1: 10
  2. Wk 2: 11
  3. Wk 3: 24
Record
3–⁠3
Conference
1–⁠2 tied for 11th in Southeastern Conference
AP now
No. 24 in the week 3 poll; peak No. 10
Points
128–⁠109
Coach
Brent Venables
Elo
1591 −20 this season
SP+ rating
12.2 No. 30 of 138; offense No. 84, defense No. 8, special teams No. 29
SRS
9.2 No. 34 of 138 in FBS
Returning
63% of last season’s EPA, No. 38 of 136
Recruiting class
No. 15 roster talent No. 17 in FBS
Offensive coordinator
Ben Arbuckle
Defensive coordinator
Todd Bates
Offense
Spread / air raid
Defense
Multiple 4–⁠2–⁠5

How good, play by play

  • Offense119th of 138
  • Defense2nd of 138
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted111th of 138
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted2nd of 138
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense-0.0439%1.06119th of 138
Defense-0.1233%1.262nd of 138
Opponent-adjusted0.04 off
-0.05 def
41% off
34% def
—111th off
2nd def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense45%8.3 yds14%2.7020%
Defense40%9.3 yds17%2.5018%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense3.1own 2718% allowed
Defense2.6own 3219% caused

CORE rating 8.4, 33rd of 138 (offense -4.7, defense -13.1).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsJohn Mateer QB1,308 yds
Passing touchdownsJohn Mateer QB9 TD
Rushing yardsLloyd Avant RB267 yds
Rushing touchdownsLloyd Avant RB2 TD
Receiving yardsIsaiah Sategna WR414 yds
Receiving touchdownsRocky Beers TE3 TD
TacklesOwen Heinecke LB45 tkl
SacksJake Kreul DL3 sacks
InterceptionsCourtland Guillory DB1 INT

Top recruits in the 2026 class

Jake Kreul DE★★★★No. 73
Jonathan Hatton Jr. RB★★★★No. 82
Bowe Bentley QB★★★★No. 89
Jayden Petit WR★★★★No. 185
Deacon Schmitt OL★★★★No. 274
Tyler Ruxer TE★★★★No. 297
Jahsiear Rogers WR★★★★No. 328
Derrick Johnson II CB★★★★No. 341

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2026 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks14.00.962
Running backs23.50.927
Receivers53.80.901
Offensive line23.50.899
Defensive line53.40.902
Linebackers43.30.882
Defensive backs43.30.872
Athletes and specialists23.00.856
Whole class253.40.894

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Roster 111

The 2026 roster

111 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2026 line; 55 have a stat line. See the roster

Transfers in 16

The 2026 portal

And 4 more, lower-rated or unrated.

Transfers out 29

And 17 more, lower-rated or unrated.

2026 Southeastern Conference standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
Kentucky4–⁠16–⁠1
Georgia4–⁠16–⁠1
Tennessee3–⁠16–⁠1
Ole Miss3–⁠15–⁠1
Florida3–⁠25–⁠2
Alabama3–⁠25–⁠2
LSU2–⁠25–⁠2
Missouri2–⁠25–⁠2
Mississippi State2–⁠24–⁠2
Auburn2–⁠24–⁠2
Texas1–⁠24–⁠2
Oklahoma1–⁠23–⁠3
Texas A&M1–⁠34–⁠3
South Carolina1–⁠33–⁠3
Arkansas1–⁠33–⁠4
Vanderbilt0–⁠43–⁠4

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.