Taylor Tatum

Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). Adjusted pass and rush: EPA per play adjusted for the defenses faced (CollegeFootballData’s WEPA). From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.

2025 Oklahoma 1 game, −1 rushing yards

Date	Opponent	Result	Car	Yds	TD	Long	Rec	Rec yds
Oct 18	atSouth Carolina	W 26–⁠7	1	−1	0	0	–	–

2024 Oklahoma 11 games, 278 rushing yards, 3 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Car	Yds	TD	Long	Rec	Rec yds
Aug 30	vs.Temple	W 51–⁠3	5	69	1	35	–	–
Sep 7	vs.Houston	W 16–⁠12	1	6	0	6	–	–
Sep 14	vs.Tulane	W 34–⁠19	9	27	1	8	1	9
Sep 21	vs.Tennessee	L 15–⁠25	3	14	0	6	–	–
Oct 12	vs.Texas	L 3–⁠34	2	17	0	13	1	4
Oct 19	vs.South Carolina	L 9–⁠35	4	16	0	6	1	18
Oct 26	atOle Miss	L 14–⁠26	9	42	0	14	–	–
Nov 2	vs.Maine	W 59–⁠14	10	48	1	17	–	–
Nov 9	atMissouri	L 23–⁠30	8	25	0	8	2	10
Nov 23	vs.Alabama	W 24–⁠3	2	8	0	6	–	–
Dec 27 ✦	vs.Navy	L 20–⁠21	3	6	0	5	–	–

Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.