2009 New Mexico

1–⁠11 (1–⁠7 Mountain West Conference), coached by Mike Locksley.

Schedule and results

New Mexico in 2009, game by game: lost at Texas A&M 6–41; lost vs. Tulsa 10–44; lost vs. Air Force 13–37; lost vs. New Mexico State 17–20; lost at Texas Tech 28–48; lost at Wyoming 13–37; lost vs. UNLV 17–34; lost at San Diego State 20–23; lost at No. 17 Utah 14–45; lost vs. No. 22 BYU 19–24; won vs. Colorado State 29–27; lost at No. 4 TCU 10–51+7−41Lost 6–41 at Texas A&M-35Texas A&MLost 10–44 vs. Tulsa-34TulsaLost 13–37 vs. Air Force-24Air ForceLost 17–20 vs. New Mexico State-3New Mexico StateLost 28–48 at Texas Tech-20Texas TechLost 13–37 at Wyoming-24WyomingLost 17–34 vs. UNLV-17UNLVLost 20–23 at San Diego State-3San Diego StateLost 14–45 at No. 17 Utah-31No. 17 UtahLost 19–24 vs. No. 22 BYU-5No. 22 BYUWon 29–27 vs. Colorado State+2Colorado StateLost 10–51 at No. 4 TCU-41No. 4 TCU
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Lost to TCU 51–⁠10; unranked in the final AP poll; 8th in the Mountain West Conference.

In program history: The 95th-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 109 on file).

Record
1–⁠11
Conference
1–⁠7 8th in Mountain West Conference
AP final
Unranked
Points
196–⁠431
Coach
Mike Locksley
Elo
1295 −166 this season
SP+ rating
-19.1 No. 110 of 120; offense No. 108, defense No. 99, special teams No. 108
SRS
−17.8 No. 112 of 120 in FBS
Recruiting class
No. 106
Offensive coordinator
Darrell Dickey
Defensive coordinator
Doug Mallory
Offense
Pro spread
Defense
4–⁠3

How good, play by play

  • Offense95th of 120
  • Defense68th of 120
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted98th of 120
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted82nd of 120
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.0036%1.0195th of 120
Defense0.0643%0.9068th of 120
Opponent-adjusted0.02 off
0.06 def
37% off
43% def
—98th off
82nd def
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense-0.2own 273% allowed
Defense0.1own 361% caused

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsDonovan Porterie QB2,411 yds
Passing touchdownsDonovan Porterie QB12 TD
Rushing yardsDemond Dennis RB427 yds
Rushing touchdownsDemond Dennis RB3 TD
Receiving yardsTy Kirk WR427 yds
Receiving touchdownsDaryl Jones WR3 TD
InterceptionsNathan Enriquez CB2 INT

Top recruits in the 2009 class

Emmanuel Yeager DUAL★★★No. 865
Kasey Carrier APB★★★No. 1496
Dallas Bollema OLB★★★No. 1647
Adam Watson WR★★No. 1696
Desmond Dennis RB★★No. 1702

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2009 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks22.50.812
Running backs32.30.783
Receivers22.00.779
Offensive line42.00.739
Defensive line22.00.744
Linebackers13.00.804
Athletes and specialists22.00.700
Whole class162.20.761

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Drafted in 2010

The 2010 draft
Rd 7Erik Cook OGWashington Redskins

Roster 102

The 2009 roster

102 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2009 line; 27 have a stat line. See the roster

2009 Mountain West Conference standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
TCU8–⁠012–⁠16
BYU7–⁠111–⁠212
Utah6–⁠210–⁠318
Air Force5–⁠38–⁠5
Wyoming4–⁠47–⁠6
UNLV3–⁠55–⁠7
San Diego State2–⁠64–⁠8
New Mexico1–⁠71–⁠11
Colorado State0–⁠83–⁠9

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.