2010 New Mexico State

2–⁠10 (1–⁠7 Western Athletic Conference), coached by DeWayne Walker.

Schedule and results

New Mexico State in 2010, game by game: lost vs. San Diego State 21–41; lost at UTEP 10–42; lost at Kansas 16–42; lost vs. No. 3 Boise State 0–59; won vs. New Mexico 16–14; lost at Fresno State 10–33; lost at Idaho 14–37; won vs. San José State 29–27; lost at Utah State 22–27; lost vs. Louisiana Tech 20–41; lost at No. 19 Nevada 6–52; lost vs. Hawai’i 24–59+7−59Lost 21–41 vs. San Diego State-20San Diego StateLost 10–42 at UTEP-32UTEPLost 16–42 at Kansas-26KansasLost 0–59 vs. No. 3 Boise State-59No. 3 Boise StateWon 16–14 vs. New Mexico+2New MexicoLost 10–33 at Fresno State-23Fresno StateLost 14–37 at Idaho-23IdahoWon 29–27 vs. San José State+2San José StateLost 22–27 at Utah State-5Utah StateLost 20–41 vs. Louisiana Tech-21Louisiana TechLost 6–52 at No. 19 Nevada-46No. 19 NevadaLost 24–59 vs. Hawai’i-35Hawai’i
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Lost to Hawai’i 59–⁠24; unranked in the final AP poll; 8th in the Western Athletic Conference.

In program history: The 74th-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 93 on file).

Record
2–⁠10
Conference
1–⁠7 8th in Western Athletic Conference
AP final
Unranked
Points
188–⁠474
Coach
DeWayne Walker
Elo
1225 −101 this season
SP+ rating
-29.4 No. 120 of 120; offense No. 119, defense No. 116, special teams No. 47
SRS
−21.3 No. 116 of 120 in FBS
Recruiting class
No. 104
Offensive coordinator
Mike Dunbar
Offense
Spread
Defense
4–⁠3

How good, play by play

  • Offense108th of 120
  • Defense108th of 120
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted122nd of 120
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted119th of 120
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense-0.0434%1.00108th of 120
Defense0.1243%0.99108th of 120
Opponent-adjusted-0.02 off
0.09 def
34% off
43% def
—122nd off
119th def
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense-0.3own 292% allowed
Defense-0.1own 332% caused

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsMatt Christian QB1,372 yds
Passing touchdownsMatt Christian QB8 TD
Rushing yardsKenny Turner RB461 yds
Rushing touchdownsSeth Smith RB3 TD
Receiving yardsMarcus Allen WR598 yds
Receiving touchdownsTodd Lee WR3 TD
InterceptionsDavon House DB2 INT

Top recruits in the 2010 class

Dylan Lusk OG★★★No. 1271
Darien Johnson CB★★★No. 1492
Dylan Davis ILB★★★No. 1643
Anthony Joyner ILB★★No. 2059
Davonte Wallace OT★★No. 2059

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2010 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Receivers32.00.767
Offensive line22.50.818
Defensive line12.00.767
Linebackers22.50.809
Defensive backs22.50.800
Whole class102.30.792

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Drafted in 2011

The 2011 draft
Rd 4Davon House CBGreen Bay Packers

Roster 102

The 2010 roster

102 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2010 line; 27 have a stat line. See the roster

2010 Western Athletic Conference standings

TeamConf.OverallAP final
Nevada7–⁠113–⁠111
Boise State7–⁠112–⁠19
Hawai’i7–⁠110–⁠4
Fresno State5–⁠38–⁠5
Louisiana Tech4–⁠45–⁠7
Idaho3–⁠56–⁠7
Utah State2–⁠64–⁠8
New Mexico State1–⁠72–⁠10
San José State0–⁠81–⁠12

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.