2006 New Mexico State

4–⁠8 (2–⁠6 Western Athletic Conference), coached by Hal Mumme.

Schedule and results

New Mexico State in 2006, game by game: won vs. SE Louisiana 30–15; lost vs. New Mexico 28–34; won vs. Texas Southern 48–14; lost at UTEP 38–44; lost at Idaho 20–28; lost vs. No. 20 Boise State 28–40; lost vs. Hawai’i 30–49; lost at Nevada 21–48; lost vs. San José State 21–31; lost at Fresno State 18–23; won at Utah State 42–20; won vs. Louisiana Tech 50–23+34−27Won 30–15 vs. SE Louisiana+15SE LouisianaLost 28–34 vs. New Mexico-6New MexicoWon 48–14 vs. Texas Southern+34Texas SouthernLost 38–44 at UTEP-6UTEPLost 20–28 at Idaho-8IdahoLost 28–40 vs. No. 20 Boise State-12No. 20 Boise StateLost 30–49 vs. Hawai’i-19Hawai’iLost 21–48 at Nevada-27NevadaLost 21–31 vs. San José State-10San José StateLost 18–23 at Fresno State-5Fresno StateWon 42–20 at Utah State+22Utah StateWon 50–23 vs. Louisiana Tech+27Louisiana Tech
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Beat Louisiana Tech 50–⁠23; unranked in the final AP poll; 7th in the Western Athletic Conference.

In program history: The 40th-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 93 on file).

Led the nationChris Williams: receiving yards (1,425 yds)

Record
4–⁠8
Conference
2–⁠6 7th in Western Athletic Conference
AP final
Unranked
Points
374–⁠369
Coach
Hal Mumme
Elo
1341 +10 this season
SP+ rating
-10.2 No. 93 of 119; offense No. 46, defense No. 114, special teams No. 96
SRS
−11.3 No. 101 of 119 in FBS
Recruiting class
No. 107
Offensive coordinators
Gary Goff and Matt Mumme
Defensive coordinator
Woody Widenhofer
Offense
Air raid
Defense
4–⁠3

How good, play by play

  • Offense3rd of 119
  • Defense117th of 119
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.1844%1.103rd of 119
Defense0.1844%1.12117th of 119
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense0.0own 302% allowed
Defense0.0own 313% caused

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. From CollegeFootballData.com.

Top recruits in the 2006 class

Joel Buschmann OG★★★No. 1045
J.D. Dowling OLB★★★No. 1183
Tarik Perry ILB★★No. 1335
Kyle Smith OT★★No. 1370
Brett Leeds OT★★No. 1370

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2006 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Receivers12.00.700
Offensive line32.30.781
Defensive line32.00.745
Linebackers32.30.761
Athletes and specialists12.00.744
Whole class112.20.755

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

2006 Western Athletic Conference standings

TeamConf.OverallAP final
Boise State8–⁠013–⁠05
Hawai’i7–⁠111–⁠3
San José State5–⁠39–⁠4
Nevada5–⁠38–⁠5
Fresno State4–⁠44–⁠8
Idaho3–⁠54–⁠8
New Mexico State2–⁠64–⁠8
Louisiana Tech1–⁠73–⁠10
Utah State1–⁠71–⁠11

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.