2013 Memphis

3–⁠9 (1–⁠7 American Athletic Conference), coached by Justin Fuente.

Schedule and results

Memphis in 2013, game by game: lost vs. Duke 14–28; lost at Middle Tennessee 15–17; won vs. Arkansas State 31–7; lost vs. UCF 17–24; lost at Houston 15–25; lost vs. SMU 29–34; lost vs. Cincinnati 21–34; won vs. UT Martin 21–6; won at South Florida 23–10; lost at No. 21 Louisville 17–24; lost vs. Temple 21–41; lost at UConn 10–45+24−35Lost 14–28 vs. Duke-14DukeLost 15–17 at Middle Tennessee-2Middle TennesseeWon 31–7 vs. Arkansas State+24Arkansas StateLost 17–24 vs. UCF-7UCFLost 15–25 at Houston-10HoustonLost 29–34 vs. SMU-5SMULost 21–34 vs. Cincinnati-13CincinnatiWon 21–6 vs. UT Martin+15UT MartinWon 23–10 at South Florida+13South FloridaLost 17–24 at No. 21 Louisville-7No. 21 LouisvilleLost 21–41 vs. Temple-20TempleLost 10–45 at UConn-35UConn
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Lost to UConn 45–⁠10; unranked in the final AP poll; tied for 9th in the American Athletic Conference.

In program history: The 61st-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 84 on file).

Record
3–⁠9
Conference
1–⁠7 tied for 9th in American Athletic Conference
AP final
Unranked
Points
234–⁠295
Coach
Justin Fuente
Elo
1339 −57 this season
SP+ rating
-3.2 No. 77 of 125; offense No. 107, defense No. 50, special teams No. 1
SRS
−9.1 No. 96 of 125 in FBS
Recruiting class
No. 90
Offensive coordinator
Darrell Dickey
Defensive coordinator
Barry Odom
Offense
Pro-style
Defense
4–⁠3

How good, play by play

  • Offense94th of 125
  • Defense44th of 125
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted105th of 125
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted39th of 125
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.0339%0.9494th of 125
Defense0.0641%0.9944th of 125
Opponent-adjusted0.05 off
0.07 def
39% off
41% def
—105th off
39th def
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense-0.2own 302% allowed
Defense-0.3own 313% caused

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsPaxton Lynch QB2,056 yds
Passing touchdownsPaxton Lynch QB9 TD
Rushing yardsBrandon Hayes RB860 yds
Rushing touchdownsBrandon Hayes RB5 TD
Receiving yardsJoe Craig WR338 yds
Receiving touchdownsAlan Cross TE2 TD
InterceptionsBobby McCain DB6 INT

Top recruits in the 2013 class

Sam Craft ATH★★★No. 1355
Claude George OLB★★★No. 1714
Dontrell Nelson ATH★★No. 2089
Doroland Dorceus RB★★No. 2104
Robert Davis APB★★No. 2227

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2013 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Running backs42.00.778
Offensive line62.00.753
Defensive line42.00.764
Linebackers22.50.785
Defensive backs32.00.775
Athletes and specialists52.20.771
Whole class242.10.768

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Drafted in 2014

The 2014 draft
Rd 7Lonnie Ballentine SHouston Texans

Roster 120

The 2013 roster

120 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2013 line; 25 have a stat line. See the roster

2013 American Athletic Conference standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
UCF8–⁠012–⁠110
Louisville7–⁠112–⁠115
Cincinnati6–⁠29–⁠4
Houston5–⁠38–⁠5
SMU4–⁠45–⁠7
Rutgers3–⁠56–⁠7
UConn3–⁠53–⁠9
South Florida2–⁠62–⁠10
Memphis1–⁠73–⁠9
Temple1–⁠72–⁠10

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.