
2023 Iowa
10–4 (7–2 Big Ten), coached by Kirk Ferentz, finished No. 24 in the AP poll. Officially 6–4: the NCAA vacated four regular-season wins. Share
From the season’s Wikipedia article: “As a result, the NCAA forced Iowa to vacate the four victories in which McNamara played before he suffered a season-ending injury.”
Schedule and results
- Biggest winBeat Western Michigan 41–10Sep 16
By 31 points, its widest win.
- Most excitingLost to Minnesota 10–12Oct 21
The win probability swung the most, by CollegeFootballData.com’s excitement index.
| Date | Opponent | Result | Elo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2 | vs | W 24–14vacated | 73% |
| Sep 9 | at | W 20–13vacated | 55% |
| Sep 16 | vs | W 41–10vacated | 79% |
| Sep 23 | at | L 0–31 | 34% |
| Sep 30 | vs | W 26–16vacated | 74% |
| Oct 7 | vs | W 20–14 | 74% |
| Oct 14 | at | W 15–6 | 46% |
| Oct 21 | vs | L 10–12 | 71% |
| Nov 4 | vs | W 10–7 | 79% |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 22–0 | 77% |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 15–13 | 80% |
| Nov 24 | at | W 13–10 | 69% |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 0–26 | 27% |
| Jan 1Bowls & playoff | vs | L 0–35 | 54% |
Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.
How it ended: Lost to Tennessee 35–0 in the Citrus Bowl; No. 24 in the final AP poll; tied for 3rd in the Big Ten.
In program history: The 34th-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 133 on file).
AP poll, week by week
- Wk 1: 25
- Wk 3: 25
- Wk 4: 24
- Wk 8: 24
- Wk 13: 20
- Wk 14: 18
- Wk 15: 20
- Final: 24
Big Ten West champions7–2 in the conference
2 consensus All-AmericansCooper DeJean, DB; Tory Taylor, P
Broyles AwardPhil Parker, coach
- Record
- 10–4
- Conference
- 7–2 tied for 3rd in Big Ten
- AP final
- No. 24 peak No. 18
- Points
- 216–207
- Coach
- Kirk Ferentz
- Elo
- 1622 +25 this season
- SP+ rating
- 5.8 No. 46 of 133; offense No. 129, defense No. 3, special teams No. 26
- SRS
- 3.7 No. 48 of 133 in FBS
- Returning
- 41% of last season’s EPA, No. 90 of 131
- Recruiting class
- No. 41 roster talent No. 41 in FBS
- Offensive coordinator
- Brian Ferentz
- Defensive coordinator
- Phil Parker
- Captains
- Jay Higgins, Cade McNamara, Luke Lachey and Cooper DeJean
- Offense
- Multiple
- Defense
- 4–2–5
How good, play by play
| EPA per play | Success | Explosiveness | FBS rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | -0.11 | 33% | 1.04 | 132nd of 133 |
| Defense | -0.07 | 35% | 1.13 | 5th of 133 |
| Opponent-adjusted | -0.06 off -0.04 def | 34% off 36% def | — | 135th off 5th def |
How these are measured
Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played.
Drives and havoc
| Points per trip inside the 40 | Average start | Havoc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 2.8 | own 31 | 20% allowed |
| Defense | 2.9 | own 27 | 16% caused |
CORE rating -1.1, 71st of 133 (offense -18.5, defense -17.4).
A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.
Leaders
| Passing yards | Deacon Hill QB | 1,152 yds |
| Passing touchdowns | Deacon Hill QB | 5 TD |
| Rushing yards | Leshon Williams RB | 821 yds |
| Rushing touchdowns | Kaleb Johnson RB | 3 TD |
| Receiving yards | Erick All TE | 299 yds |
| Receiving touchdowns | Erick All TE | 3 TD |
| Tackles | Jay Higgins LB | 171 tkl |
| Sacks | Joe Evans DE | 9 sacks |
| Interceptions | Sebastian Castro DB | 3 INT |
Top recruits in the 2023 class
| Ben Kueter LB | ★★★★ | No. 294 |
| Trevor Lauck OT | ★★★★ | No. 439 |
| Alex Mota ATH | ★★★ | No. 574 |
| Kahlil Tate S | ★★★ | No. 614 |
| Leighton Jones OL | ★★★ | No. 628 |
247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.
The 2023 class by position
| Signed | Stars | Rating | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quarterbacks | 1 | 3.0 | 0.869 |
| Running backs | 2 | 3.0 | 0.856 |
| Receivers | 5 | 3.0 | 0.854 |
| Offensive line | 3 | 3.3 | 0.875 |
| Defensive line | 4 | 3.0 | 0.862 |
| Linebackers | 2 | 3.0 | 0.843 |
| Defensive backs | 3 | 3.0 | 0.860 |
| Athletes and specialists | 5 | 3.0 | 0.856 |
| Whole class | 25 | 3.0 | 0.859 |
High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.
Drafted in 2024
The 2024 draft| Rd 2 | Cooper DeJean CB | Philadelphia Eagles |
| Rd 4 | Erick All TE | Cincinnati Bengals |
| Rd 4 | Tory Taylor P | Chicago Bears |
| Rd 6 | Logan Lee DT | Pittsburgh Steelers |
Roster 126
The 2023 roster126 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2023 line; 57 have a stat line. See the roster
Transfers in 6
The 2023 portal| ★★★★ | from | |
| ★★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| Daijon Parker OT | ★★★ | from Saginaw Valley State |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from |
Transfers out 12
| ★★★★ | to | |
| ★★★★ | to | |
| ★★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | no new school on file | |
| ★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | no new school on file | |
| ★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | no new school on file | |
| ★★★ | to | |
| ★★ | to Coffeyville C.C. |
All-Big Ten
3 first team, 1 second teamFirst team
Jay HigginsLBCoaches-1; Media-1
Cooper DeJeanDBCoaches-1; Media-1
Tory TaylorPCoaches-1; Media-1
Second team
Sebastian CastroDBMedia-2
From Wikipedia’s 2023 all-conference team article, with the selectors that named each player (AP-1: the Associated Press’s first team).
2023 Big Ten standings
Conference page| Team | Conf. | Overall | AP final |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9–0 | 15–0 | 1 | |
| 8–1 | 11–2 | 10 | |
| 7–2 | 10–3 | 13 | |
| 7–2 | 10–4 | 24 | |
| 5–4 | 8–5 | ||
| 5–4 | 7–6 | ||
| 4–5 | 8–5 | ||
| 3–6 | 7–6 | ||
| 3–6 | 6–7 | ||
| 3–6 | 5–7 | ||
| 3–6 | 5–7 | ||
| 3–6 | 4–8 | ||
| 2–7 | 4–8 | ||
| 1–8 | 3–9 |
Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.