Receiver, Clemson, 2023–26
Tyler Brown
- Number
- No. 6
- Height
- 5′11″
- Weight
- 185 lb
- Class (2026)
- Senior
- Hometown
- Greenville, SC
Tyler Brown plays receiver for Clemson. Last time out, against Charleston Southern: 2 catches, 8 yards.
2026 so far
23 catches, 196 yards
In the news: Iowa football injury update: DB Tyler Brown 'out for a while', Yahoo Sports
Last game: 2 catches, 8 yards vs. Charleston Southern, W 37–0
Next game: vs. Virginia Tech, Oct 24
Filled bars: wins; outlined: losses.
Career highs
10catches, career highvs. Miami, 2026153receiving yards, career highat Syracuse, 20232receiving touchdowns, career highvs. Florida Atlantic, 2023Team titles: ACC champions, 2024
Receiving
* The season in progress, so far.
Returns
Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls. A dash: the source has no number for that season (often an FCS season), and career totals count only the numbers on file.
On the roster
| Season | Team | No. | Pos | Class | Ht | Wt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Clemson | 6 | WR | Fr. | ||
| 2024 | Clemson | 6 | WR | So. | ||
| 2025 | Clemson | 6 | WR | Jr. | ||
| 2026 | Clemson | 6 | WR | Sr. | 5′11″ | 185 |
As each season’s roster listed the player (CollegeFootballData). Classes before the latest listing are counted back from it; “Yr 1” is the year on file where that count can’t place a season he played (a redshirt, transfer or 2020 year); height and weight as last listed.
Per play
| Season | Team | Plays | EPA/play | Pctile | Median | Total | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Clemson | 68 | 0.51 | 17th (n=681) | 0.80 | 34.6 | 7% |
| 2024 | Clemson | 6 | -0.02 | – | – | -0.1 | – |
| 2025 | Clemson | 38 | 0.35 | 33rd (n=1040) | 0.46 | 13.3 | 6% |
| 2026 | Clemson | 29 | 0.75 | 85th (n=829) | 0.43 | 21.8 | 7% |
Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.
Game by game
2026 Clemson 6 games, 23 catches, 196 yards
| Date | Opponent | Result | Rec | Yds | TD | Long | Rush |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5 | at | L 10–51 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 7 | – |
| Sep 12 | vs. | W 22–7 | 4 | 44 | 0 | 20 | – |
| Sep 19 | vs. | W 28–20 | 2 | 28 | 0 | 15 | 34 |
| Sep 25 | at | W 24–10 | 3 | 29 | 0 | 24 | 27 |
| Oct 3 | vs. | L 13–41 | 10 | 76 | 0 | 24 | – |
| Oct 17 | vs. | W 37–0 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 4 |
2025 Clemson 10 games, 22 catches, 191 yards
| Date | Opponent | Result | Rec | Yds | TD | Long | Rush |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30 | vs. | L 10–17 | 4 | 43 | 0 | 17 | 7 |
| Sep 6 | vs. | W 27–16 | 4 | 45 | 0 | 23 | – |
| Sep 13 | at | L 21–24 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 26 |
| Sep 20 | vs. | L 21–34 | 3 | 33 | 0 | 14 | 7 |
| Oct 4 | at | W 38–10 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 5 | – |
| Oct 11 | at | W 41–10 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | – |
| Oct 18 | vs. | L 24–35 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9 | – |
| Nov 1 | vs. | L 45–46 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 6 | – |
| Nov 22 | vs. | W 45–10 | – | – | – | – | 21 |
| Dec 27 ✦ | vs. | L 10–22 | 3 | 31 | 0 | 20 | 10 |
2024 Clemson 3 games, 5 catches, 30 yards
2023 Clemson 13 games, 52 catches, 531 yards, 4 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Rec | Yds | TD | Long | Rush |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4 | at | L 7–28 | 2 | 21 | 0 | 21 | – |
| Sep 9 | vs. | W 66–17 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 7 | – |
| Sep 16 | vs. | W 48–14 | 3 | 49 | 2 | 30 | – |
| Sep 23 | vs. | L 24–31 | 5 | 84 | 0 | 28 | – |
| Sep 30 | at | W 31–14 | 9 | 153 | 0 | 47 | 23 |
| Oct 7 | vs. | W 17–12 | 3 | 22 | 0 | 15 | – |
| Oct 21 | at | L 20–28 | 5 | 53 | 0 | 21 | – |
| Oct 28 | at | L 17–24 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 10 | – |
| Nov 4 | vs. | W 31–23 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 9 | – |
| Nov 11 | vs. | W 42–21 | 7 | 41 | 1 | 14 | – |
| Nov 18 | vs. | W 31–20 | 6 | 32 | 0 | 8 | – |
| Nov 25 | at | W 16–7 | 5 | 40 | 0 | 39 | – |
| Dec 29 ✦ | vs. | W 38–35 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.
Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.
