Receiver, Arizona State, to 2005
Moey Mutz
Lettered 2003–05 (school media guide)
Moey Mutz played receiver at Arizona State (to 2005).
Career highs
90receiving yards, best game on filevs. Northwestern, 2005Receiving
| Season | Team | Rec | Yds | Avg | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | Arizona State | 35 | 438 | 12.5 | 1 | 42 |
| 2005 | Arizona State | 21 | 331 | 15.8 | 1 | 38 |
| On file (2004–05) | 56 | 769 | 13.7 | 2 | 42 | |
Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls. Every season here is summed from the game box scores (the source has no season lines for them; a game missing from the box scores is missing here).
Game by game
2005 Arizona State 9 games, 21 catches, 331 yards, 1 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Rec | Yds | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1 | vs. Temple | W 63–16 | 2 | 35 | 0 | 24 |
| Sep 10 | vs. LSU | L 31–35 | 4 | 50 | 1 | 27 |
| Sep 17 | vs. Northwestern | W 52–21 | 4 | 90 | 0 | 38 |
| Sep 24 | at Oregon State | W 42–24 | 1 | 28 | 0 | 28 |
| Oct 1 | vs. USC | L 28–38 | 3 | 34 | 0 | 14 |
| Oct 8 | vs. Oregon | L 17–31 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Oct 22 | at Stanford | L 35–45 | 4 | 37 | 0 | 13 |
| Oct 29 | vs. Washington | W 44–20 | 1 | 38 | 0 | 38 |
| Nov 25 | vs. Arizona | W 23–20 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
2004 Arizona State 10 games, 35 catches, 438 yards, 1 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Rec | Yds | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2 | vs. UTEP | W 41–9 | 3 | 43 | 0 | 18 |
| Sep 11 | atNorthwestern | W 30–21 | 4 | 48 | 0 | 19 |
| Sep 18 | vs. Iowa | W 44–7 | 3 | 30 | 1 | 14 |
| Oct 16 | atUSC | L 7–45 | 2 | 25 | 0 | 15 |
| Oct 23 | vs. UCLA | W 48–42 | 2 | 25 | 0 | 14 |
| Oct 30 | at California | L 0–27 | 4 | 55 | 0 | 17 |
| Nov 6 | vs.Stanford | W 34–31 | 5 | 56 | 0 | 24 |
| Nov 13 | vs. Washington State | W 45–28 | 5 | 56 | 0 | 17 |
| Nov 26 | atArizona | L 27–34 | 4 | 76 | 0 | 42 |
| Dec 31 ✦ | vs. Purdue | W 27–23 | 3 | 24 | 0 | 25 |
Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.
Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.