Running back, Western Kentucky (from USC, Nebraska), 2018–23
Markese Stepp
Lettered 2018–20 at USC (school media guide)
- Number
- No. 30
- Height
- 6′1″
- Weight
- 225 lb
- Class (2023)
- Senior
- Hometown
- Indianapolis, IN
Markese Stepp played running back at USC (2018–20), Nebraska (2021) and Western Kentucky (2022–23).
Career highs
101rushing yards, career highvs. Fordham, 2021Rushing
| Season | Team | Car | Yds | Avg | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | USC | 7 | 33 | 4.7 | 0 | 9 |
| 2019 | USC | 48 | 307 | 6.4 | 3 | 35 |
| 2020 | USC | 45 | 165 | 3.7 | 3 | 49 |
| 2021 | Nebraska | 45 | 177 | 3.9 | 2 | 19 |
| 2022 | Western Kentucky | 20 | 102 | 5.1 | 0 | 39 |
| 2023 | Western Kentucky | 69 | 310 | 4.5 | 3 | 56 |
| Career | 234 | 1,094 | 4.7 | 11 | 56 | |
Receiving
| Season | Team | Rec | Yds | Avg | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | USC | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | 7 |
| 2020 | USC | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 0 | 16 |
| 2021 | Nebraska | 1 | 30 | 30.0 | 0 | 30 |
| 2023 | Western Kentucky | 7 | 73 | 10.4 | 0 | 26 |
| Career | 12 | 138 | 11.5 | 0 | 30 | |
Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls.
On the roster
| Season | Team | No. | Pos | Class | Ht | Wt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | USC | 30 | RB | Yr 1 | ||
| 2019 | USC | 30 | RB | Yr 2 | ||
| 2020 | USC | 30 | RB | Yr 3 | ||
| 2021 | Nebraska | 30 | RB | Yr 4 | ||
| 2022 | Western Kentucky | 30 | RB | Yr 5 | ||
| 2023 | Western Kentucky | 30 | RB | Sr. (Yr 6) | 6′1″ | 225 |
As each season’s roster listed the player (CollegeFootballData). Classes before the latest listing are counted back from it; “Yr 1” is the year on file where that count can’t place a season he played (a redshirt, transfer or 2020 year); height and weight as last listed.
Per play
| Season | Team | Plays | EPA/play | Pctile | Median | Total | Usage | Adj. rush |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | USC | 8 | 0.51 | – | – | 4.1 | – | – |
| 2019 | USC | 48 | 0.35 | – | – | 17.0 | 12% | 0.25 |
| 2020 | USC | 49 | -0.07 | – | – | -3.2 | 13% | 0.00 |
| 2021 | Nebraska | 29 | 0.01 | – | – | 0.4 | 7% | – |
| 2022 | Western Kentucky | 14 | 0.14 | – | – | 1.9 | – | – |
| 2023 | Western Kentucky | 78 | 0.05 | 19th (n=450) | 0.17 | 4.0 | 10% | 0.12 |
Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). Adjusted pass and rush: EPA per play adjusted for the defenses faced (CollegeFootballData’s WEPA). From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.
Game by game
2023 Western Kentucky 11 games, 310 rushing yards, 3 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Yds | TD | Long | Rec | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2 | vs. | W 41–24 | 4 | 21 | 1 | 11 | 2 | 18 |
| Sep 9 | vs. | W 52–22 | 9 | 48 | 0 | 20 | – | – |
| Sep 16 | at | L 10–63 | 8 | 19 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 5 |
| Sep 28 | vs. | W 31–10 | 6 | 16 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 19 |
| Oct 5 | at | W 35–28 | 9 | 76 | 1 | 56 | – | – |
| Oct 17 | at | L 17–20 | 7 | 23 | 0 | 8 | – | – |
| Oct 24 | vs. | L 29–42 | 4 | 29 | 0 | 14 | – | – |
| Nov 4 | at | W 21–13 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 2 | – | – |
| Nov 11 | vs. | L 29–38 | 8 | 34 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 26 |
| Nov 18 | vs. | W 28–23 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 5 | – | – |
| Nov 25 | at | W 41–28 | 7 | 32 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 5 |
2022 Western Kentucky 3 games, 102 rushing yards
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Yds | TD | Long | Rec | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19 | at | L 17–41 | 7 | 33 | 0 | 10 | – | – |
| Nov 26 | at | W 32–31 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 4 | – | – |
| Dec 21 ✦ | vs. | W 44–23 | 7 | 63 | 0 | 39 | – | – |
2021 Nebraska 6 games, 177 rushing yards, 2 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Yds | TD | Long | Rec | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28 | at | L 22–30 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 30 |
| Sep 4 | vs. | W 52–7 | 18 | 101 | 0 | 19 | – | – |
| Sep 11 | vs. | W 28–3 | 9 | 17 | 0 | 7 | – | – |
| Sep 25 | at | L 20–23 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | – | – |
| Oct 2 | vs. | W 56–7 | 5 | 29 | 0 | 9 | – | – |
| Nov 20 | at | L 28–35 | 9 | 18 | 1 | 7 | – | – |
2020 USC 5 games, 165 rushing yards, 3 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Yds | TD | Long | Rec | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs. | W 28–27 | 14 | 53 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 12 |
| Nov 14 | at | W 34–30 | 12 | 82 | 1 | 49 | – | – |
| Dec 6 | vs. | W 38–13 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 16 |
| Dec 12 | at | W 43–38 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | – | – |
| Dec 18 | vs. | L 24–31 | 13 | 25 | 1 | 8 | – | – |
2019 USC 6 games, 307 rushing yards, 3 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Yds | TD | Long | Rec | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7 | vs. | W 45–20 | 3 | 33 | 0 | 20 | – | – |
| Sep 14 | at | L 27–30 | 9 | 53 | 0 | 15 | – | – |
| Sep 20 | vs. | W 30–23 | 3 | 11 | 1 | 4 | – | – |
| Sep 28 | at | L 14–28 | 10 | 62 | 0 | 35 | – | – |
| Oct 12 | at | L 27–30 | 10 | 82 | 1 | 25 | – | – |
| Oct 19 | vs. | W 41–14 | 13 | 66 | 1 | 14 | – | – |
2018 USC 3 games, 33 rushing yards
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Yds | TD | Long | Rec | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13 | vs. | W 31–20 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 7 | – | – |
| Oct 27 | vs. | L 35–38 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Nov 24 | vs. | L 17–24 | 5 | 23 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 7 |
Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.
Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.
