East Carolina, 2003–06
Kasey Ross
Kasey Ross played at East Carolina (2003–06).
Defense
| Season | Team | Int |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | East Carolina | 3 |
| 2006 | East Carolina | 4 |
| On file (2005–06) | 7 | |
Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls. Every season here is summed from the game box scores (the source has no season lines for them; a game missing from the box scores is missing here). Before 2016 our source records only interceptions for most defenders (no tackles, tackles for loss or sacks), so these lines count interceptions only. His tackles, tackles for loss and sacks from other sources are under “Defense before 2016” below.
Defense before 2016
| Season | G | Solo | Ast | Tkl | TFL | Int | PBU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 11 | 32 | 3 | 35 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| 2006 | 13 | 32 | 16 | 48 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| On file | 64 | 19 | 83 | 5 | 7 | 17 | |
Our box scores carry tackles, tackles for loss and sacks from 2016 only, so these come from other sources: cfbstats.com (Open Data Commons Attribution License), its game lines summed (G: the games he has a line in). A dash: the source has no number for it.
Game by game
2006 East Carolina 4 games with an interception on file, 4 INT
| Date | Opponent | Result | Int |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16 | vs. Memphis | W 35–20 | 1 |
| Sep 23 | vs. West Virginia | L 10–27 | 1 |
| Nov 4 | at UCF | W 23–10 | 1 |
| Nov 25 | at NC State | W 21–16 | 1 |
2005 East Carolina 3 games with an interception on file, 3 INT
| Date | Opponent | Result | Int |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24 | atWest Virginia | L 15–20 | 1 |
| Nov 19 | at Marshall | W 34–29 | 1 |
| Nov 26 | vs. UAB | W 31–23 | 1 |
Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file. Before 2016 our source’s box scores record only interceptions for defenders (no tackles, tackles for loss or sacks), so only those games are listed. His tackles, tackles for loss and sacks from other sources are under “Defense before 2016” below.
Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.