Defensive line, Wake Forest, 2018–22
JaCorey Johns
- Number
- No. 4
- Height
- 6′4″
- Weight
- 255 lb
- Class (2022)
- Junior
- Hometown
- Cartersville, GA
JaCorey Johns played defensive line at Wake Forest (2018–22).
Career highs
8tackles, career highat Virginia Tech, 2019Defense
| Season | Team | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | PD | Hur |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Wake Forest | 53 | 29 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 2020 | Wake Forest | 32 | 17 | 6.5 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| 2021 | Wake Forest | 16 | 6 | 4 | 2.5 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | Wake Forest | 30 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Career | 131 | 64 | 21.5 | 8.5 | 0 | 13 | |
Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls.
On the roster
| Season | Team | No. | Pos | Class | Ht | Wt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Wake Forest | 4 | DL | Yr 1 | ||
| 2020 | Wake Forest | 4 | DL | Yr 2 | ||
| 2021 | Wake Forest | 4 | DL | Yr 3 | ||
| 2022 | Wake Forest | 4 | DL | Jr. (Yr 4) | 6′4″ | 255 |
As each season’s roster listed the player (CollegeFootballData). Classes before the latest listing are counted back from it; “Yr 1” is the year on file where that count can’t place a season he played (a redshirt, transfer or 2020 year); height and weight as last listed.
Game by game
2022 Wake Forest 10 games, 30 tackles, 1 sack
| Date | Opponent | Result | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1 | vs. VMI | W 44–10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 10 | at Vanderbilt | W 45–25 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 17 | vs. Liberty | W 37–36 | 5 | 2 | 1.5 | 1 | 0 |
| Sep 24 | vs. Clemson | L 45–51 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 1 | at Florida State | W 31–21 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 22 | vs. Boston College | W 43–15 | 2 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 5 | at NC State | L 21–30 | 3 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 12 | vs. North Carolina | L 34–36 | 6 | 3 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 19 | vs. Syracuse | W 45–35 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 26 | at Duke | L 31–34 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2021 Wake Forest 6 games, 16 tackles, 2.5 sacks
| Date | Opponent | Result | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3 | vs. Old Dominion | W 42–10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 11 | vs. Norfolk State | W 41–16 | 3 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 18 | vs.Florida State | W 35–14 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Sep 24 | at Virginia | W 37–17 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Oct 2 | vs. Louisville | W 37–34 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 9 | atSyracuse | W 40–37 | 2 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 |
2020 Wake Forest 9 games, 32 tackles, 2 sacks
| Date | Opponent | Result | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12 | vs.Clemson | L 13–37 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 19 | atNC State | L 42–45 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 2 | vs. Campbell | W 66–14 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| Oct 17 | vs.Virginia | W 40–23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 24 | vs. Virginia Tech | W 23–16 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Oct 31 | atSyracuse | W 38–14 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 14 | atNorth Carolina | L 53–59 | 7 | 2 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
| Dec 12 | atLouisville | L 21–45 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Dec 30 ✦ | vs. Wisconsin | L 28–42 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2019 Wake Forest 13 games, 53 tackles, 3 sacks
| Date | Opponent | Result | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30 | vs. Utah State | W 38–35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 6 | at Rice | W 41–21 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Sep 13 | vs.North Carolina | W 24–18 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 21 | vs. Elon | W 49–7 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 28 | atBoston College | W 27–24 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 12 | vs.Louisville | L 59–62 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 0.5 | 0 |
| Oct 19 | vs.Florida State | W 22–20 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| Nov 2 | vs.NC State | W 44–10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 9 | atVirginia Tech | L 17–36 | 8 | 4 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 16 | atClemson | L 3–52 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 23 | vs.Duke | W 39–27 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 30 | atSyracuse | L 30–39 | 4 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 |
| Dec 27 ✦ | vs. Michigan State | L 21–27 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.
Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.