Running back, Michigan State (from Sacramento State), 2022–25
Elijah Tau-Tolliver
Lettered 2025 (school media guide)
- Number
- No. 4
- Height
- 6′1″
- Weight
- 211 lb
- Class (2025)
- Senior
- Hometown
- Sparks, NV
Elijah Tau-Tolliver played running back at Sacramento State (2022–24) and Michigan State (2025).
Career highs
141rushing yards, career highvs. Weber State, 20243rushing touchdowns, career highvs. Weber State, 202411catches, career highvs. Weber State, 202485receiving yards, career highvs. Weber State, 2024Team titles: Big Sky champions, 2022
Rushing
| Season | Team | Car | Yds | Avg | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Sacramento State | 24 | 193 | 8.0 | 0 | 22 |
| 2023 | Sacramento State | 63 | 384 | 6.1 | 7 | 53 |
| 2024 | Sacramento State | 183 | 954 | 5.2 | 7 | 70 |
| 2025 | Michigan State | 72 | 428 | 5.9 | 2 | 85 |
| Career | 342 | 1,959 | 5.7 | 16 | 85 | |
Returns
| Season | Team | KR | Yds | TD | PR | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Sacramento State | 19 | 458 | 0 | – | – | – |
| 2023 | Sacramento State | 17 | 418 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 |
| 2025 | Michigan State | 6 | 79 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Career | 42 | 955 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | |
Receiving
| Season | Team | Rec | Yds | Avg | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Sacramento State | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 0 | 15 |
| 2023 | Sacramento State | 6 | 30 | 5.0 | 0 | 11 |
| 2024 | Sacramento State | 37 | 287 | 7.8 | 2 | 27 |
| 2025 | Michigan State | 18 | 139 | 7.7 | 0 | 32 |
| Career | 64 | 490 | 7.7 | 2 | 32 | |
Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls. A dash: the source has no number for that season (often an FCS season), and career totals count only the numbers on file.
On the roster
| Season | Team | No. | Pos | Class | Ht | Wt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Sacramento State | 4 | RB | Fr. | ||
| 2023 | Sacramento State | 4 | RB | So. | ||
| 2024 | Sacramento State | 4 | RB | Jr. | ||
| 2025 | Michigan State | 4 | RB | Sr. | 6′1″ | 211 |
As each season’s roster listed the player (CollegeFootballData). Classes before the latest listing are counted back from it; “Yr 1” is the year on file where that count can’t place a season he played (a redshirt, transfer or 2020 year); height and weight as last listed.
Per play
| Season | Team | Plays | EPA/play | Pctile | Median | Total | Usage | Adj. rush |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Sacramento State (FCS) | 23 | 0.24 | – | – | 5.6 | 5% | – |
| 2023 | Sacramento State (FCS) | 70 | 0.32 | 86th (n=450) | 0.17 | 22.6 | 8% | – |
| 2024 | Sacramento State (FCS) | 205 | 0.12 | 37th (n=434) | 0.16 | 24.8 | 30% | 0.12 |
| 2025 | Michigan State | 93 | 0.07 | 42nd (n=576) | 0.10 | 6.8 | 13% | 0.13 |
Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). Adjusted pass and rush: EPA per play adjusted for the defenses faced (CollegeFootballData’s WEPA). From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.
Rushing detail
| Season | Team | Success | Line yards | Second level | Open field | Stuffed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Michigan State | 38% | 2.80 | 1.10 | 2.40 | 21% |
Where his yards came from, per carry: line yards are the ones credited to the blockers (the first few, and losses), second level the yards 5 to 10 past the line, open field those beyond 10. Success: carries that kept the offense on schedule. Stuffed: carries stopped at or behind the line. From CollegeFootballData, FBS games, 2025 on.
Game by game
2025 Michigan State 11 games, 428 rushing yards, 2 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Rush yds | Rush TD | KR | Yds | PR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29 | vs. | W 23–6 | 8 | 17 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Sep 6 | vs. | W 42–40 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | – |
| Sep 13 | vs. | W 41–24 | 4 | 37 | 1 | 1 | 17 | – |
| Sep 20 | at | L 31–45 | 2 | 4 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Oct 11 | vs. | L 13–38 | 1 | 2 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Oct 18 | at | L 13–38 | 5 | 13 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Oct 25 | vs. | L 20–31 | 5 | 18 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Nov 1 | at | L 20–23 | 11 | 127 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Nov 15 | vs. | L 10–28 | 6 | 79 | 1 | – | – | – |
| Nov 22 | at | L 17–20 | 16 | 35 | 0 | 1 | 0 | – |
| Nov 29 | vs. | W 38–28 | 13 | 95 | 0 | 3 | 54 | – |
2024 Sacramento State 11 games, 954 rushing yards, 7 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Rush yds | Rush TD | KR | Yds | PR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29 | at | L 24–42 | 22 | 110 | 2 | – | – | – |
| Sep 7 | at | L 30–46 | 14 | 74 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Sep 14 | vs. | W 34–7 | 21 | 111 | 1 | – | – | – |
| Sep 21 | at | W 34–0 | 20 | 127 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Sep 28 | at | L 16–34 | 16 | 77 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Oct 12 | vs. | L 28–35 | 17 | 90 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Oct 19 | vs. | W 51–48 | 19 | 141 | 3 | – | – | – |
| Oct 26 | at | L 27–30 | 11 | 100 | 1 | – | – | – |
| Nov 9 | at | L 7–49 | 13 | 43 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Nov 16 | at | L 23–26 | 13 | 33 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Nov 23 | vs. | L 39–42 | 17 | 48 | 0 | – | – | – |
2023 Sacramento State 13 games, 384 rushing yards, 7 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Rush yds | Rush TD | KR | Yds | PR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1 | at | W 38–24 | 8 | 23 | 0 | 2 | 64 | – |
| Sep 9 | vs. | W 34–6 | 7 | 59 | 0 | 2 | 76 | 1 |
| Sep 16 | at | W 30–23 | 1 | 1 | 1 | – | – | – |
| Sep 23 | at | L 27–36 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 50 | – |
| Sep 30 | vs. | W 31–30 | 4 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 38 | – |
| Oct 14 | at | W 21–13 | 2 | 13 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Oct 21 | vs. | L 30–42 | 8 | 100 | 2 | – | – | – |
| Oct 28 | vs. | W 51–16 | 8 | 14 | 1 | – | – | – |
| Nov 4 | at | L 7–34 | 5 | 18 | 0 | 2 | 40 | – |
| Nov 11 | vs. | W 41–30 | 9 | 99 | 2 | 3 | 91 | – |
| Nov 18 | at | L 21–31 | 1 | −4 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Nov 25 ✦ | at | W 42–35 | 5 | 39 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Dec 2 ✦ | at | L 24–34 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 59 | – |
2022 Sacramento State 9 games, 193 rushing yards
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Rush yds | Rush TD | KR | Yds | PR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3 | vs. | W 56–33 | 8 | 71 | 0 | 4 | 91 | – |
| Sep 24 | at | W 41–10 | 2 | 11 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Oct 1 | at | W 49–21 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 20 | – |
| Oct 15 | at | W 52–28 | 6 | 57 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Oct 29 | vs. | W 31–28 | – | – | – | 2 | 37 | – |
| Nov 5 | at | W 33–30 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 59 | – |
| Nov 11 | at | W 45–17 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 38 | – |
| Nov 19 | vs. | W 27–21 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 43 | – |
| Dec 9 | vs. | L 63–66 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 7 | 170 | – |
Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.
Before the draft
| Drill | Pro day 2026 |
|---|---|
| Height | 6′0⅛″ |
| Weight | 204 lb |
| Arm length | 31½″ |
| Hand size | 9⅞″ |
| Wingspan | 74⅜″ |
| 40-yard dash | 4.60 s |
| 10-yard split | 1.56 s |
| Vertical jump | 32½″ |
| Broad jump | 9′9″ |
| Bench press | 15 reps |
| 3-cone drill | 7.42 s |
| 20-yard shuttle | 4.65 s |
Pre-draft measurables: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA).
Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.
