Derrick Green

Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). Adjusted pass and rush: EPA per play adjusted for the defenses faced (CollegeFootballData’s WEPA). From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.

2016 TCU 8 games, 141 rushing yards, 2 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Car	Yds	TD	Long	Rec	Rec yds
Sep 3	vs.South Dakota State	W 59–⁠41	5	25	0	15	–	–
Sep 10	vs.Arkansas	L 38–⁠41	5	31	0	14	–	–
Sep 17	vs.Iowa State	W 41–⁠20	10	26	1	7	–	–
Sep 23	atSMU	W 33–⁠3	2	3	0	2	–	–
Oct 8	atKansas	W 24–⁠23	2	7	0	4	–	–
Oct 29	vs.Texas Tech	L 24–⁠27	8	21	1	6	–	–
Nov 5	atBaylor	W 62–⁠22	5	33	0	12	–	–
Nov 25	atTexas	W 31–⁠9	1	−5	0	0	–	–

2015 Michigan 8 games, 157 rushing yards, 2 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Car	Yds	TD	Long	Rec	Rec yds
Sep 3	atUtah	L 17–⁠24	2	1	0	2	–	–
Sep 12	vs.Oregon State	W 35–⁠7	8	35	1	12	–	–
Sep 19	vs.UNLV	W 28–⁠7	3	10	0	6	–	–
Sep 26	vs.BYU	W 31–⁠0	10	28	0	6	1	7
Oct 3	atMaryland	W 28–⁠0	7	26	0	9	–	–
Oct 10	vs.Northwestern	W 38–⁠0	12	47	1	10	–	–
Oct 31	atMinnesota	W 29–⁠26	3	4	0	3	–	–
Nov 7	vs.Rutgers	W 49–⁠16	2	6	0	3	–	–

2014 Michigan 6 games, 471 rushing yards, 3 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Car	Yds	TD	Long	Rec	Rec yds
Aug 30	vs.App State	W 52–⁠14	15	170	1	62	–	–
Sep 6	atNotre Dame	L 0–⁠31	13	25	0	7	–	–
Sep 13	vs.Miami (OH)	W 34–⁠10	22	137	2	27	–	–
Sep 20	vs.Utah	L 10–⁠26	14	59	0	20	2	26
Sep 27	vs.Minnesota	L 14–⁠30	6	6	0	3	–	–
Oct 4	atRutgers	L 24–⁠26	12	74	0	26	–	–

2013 Michigan 11 games, 270 rushing yards, 2 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Car	Yds	TD	Long	Rec	Rec yds
Aug 31	vs.Central Michigan	W 59–⁠9	11	58	1	30	–	–
Sep 7	vs.Notre Dame	W 41–⁠30	1	−1	0	0	–	–
Sep 14	vs.Akron	W 28–⁠24	1	3	0	3	–	–
Oct 5	vs.Minnesota	W 42–⁠13	10	23	1	14	–	–
Oct 12	atPenn State	L 40–⁠43	3	1	0	3	–	–
Oct 19	vs.Indiana	W 63–⁠47	6	21	0	7	–	–
Nov 9	vs.Nebraska	L 13–⁠17	8	11	0	7	–	–
Nov 16	atNorthwestern	W 27–⁠19	19	79	0	23	–	–
Nov 23	atIowa	L 21–⁠24	11	23	0	9	–	–
Nov 30	vs.Ohio State	L 41–⁠42	12	47	0	13	–	–
Dec 28 ✦	vs.Kansas State	L 14–⁠31	1	5	0	5	–	–

Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.

Unmarked: Combine and pro day results compiled by array-carpenter (nfl-draft-data); W: Pre-draft measurables: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA).