Running back, Utah Tech (from California), 2020–25
Chris Street
- Number
- No. 3
- Height
- 5′9″
- Weight
- 210 lb
- Class (2025)
- Senior
- Hometown
- Eastvale, CA
Chris Street played running back at California (2020–22) and Utah Tech (2023–25).
Career highs
2rushing touchdowns, career highvs. Stephen F. Austin, 2023Rushing
| Season | Team | Car | Yds | Avg | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | California | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | California | 21 | 107 | 5.1 | 1 | 19 |
| 2023* | Utah Tech | 61 | 392 | 6.4 | 2 | 36 |
| 2024 | Utah Tech | 64 | 185 | 2.9 | 1 | 20 |
| 2025 | Utah Tech | 54 | 213 | 3.9 | 1 | 18 |
| Career | 201 | 899 | 4.5 | 5 | 36 | |
Receiving
| Season | Team | Rec | Yds | Avg | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | California | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | 4 |
| 2023* | Utah Tech | 7 | 25 | 3.6 | 0 | 9 |
| 2024 | Utah Tech | 17 | 136 | 8.0 | 2 | 31 |
| 2025 | Utah Tech | 14 | 70 | 5.0 | 1 | 12 |
| Career | 39 | 235 | 6.0 | 3 | 31 | |
Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls. * That team-season’s player lines are missing part of the team’s yards in our source, so these numbers may be short.
On the roster
| Season | Team | No. | Pos | Class | Ht | Wt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | California | 3 | RB | Yr 1 | ||
| 2021 | California | 3 | RB | Yr 2 | ||
| 2022 | California | 3 | RB | Yr 3 | ||
| 2023 | Utah Tech | 3 | RB | Yr 4 | ||
| 2024 | Utah Tech | 3 | RB | Yr 5 | ||
| 2025 | Utah Tech | 3 | RB | Sr. (Yr 6) | 5′9″ | 210 |
As each season’s roster listed the player (CollegeFootballData). Classes before the latest listing are counted back from it; “Yr 1” is the year on file where that count can’t place a season he played (a redshirt, transfer or 2020 year); height and weight as last listed.
Per play
| Season | Team | Plays | EPA/play | Pctile | Median | Total | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | California | 1 | -0.29 | – | – | -0.3 | – |
| 2021 | California | 20 | 0.05 | – | – | 0.9 | 6% |
| 2023 | Utah Tech (FCS) | 63 | 0.28 | 79th (n=450) | 0.17 | 17.7 | 10% |
| 2024 | Utah Tech (FCS) | 66 | -0.00 | 11th (n=434) | 0.16 | -0.1 | 14% |
| 2025 | Utah Tech (FCS) | 74 | 0.14 | 61st (n=576) | 0.10 | 10.2 | 11% |
Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.
Game by game
2025 Utah Tech 10 games, 213 rushing yards, 1 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Rush yds | Rush TD | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30 | vs. | L 24–31 | 4 | 7 | 1 | – | – | – |
| Sep 13 | at | L 6–20 | 5 | 16 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 0 |
| Sep 27 | at | L 10–42 | 5 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 |
| Oct 4 | at | L 17–23 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 0 |
| Oct 11 | vs. | L 23–41 | 6 | 41 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Oct 25 | vs. | L 7–28 | 5 | 31 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 0 |
| Nov 1 | vs. | W 34–33 | 4 | 16 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Nov 8 | at | L 10–31 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| Nov 15 | at | L 0–23 | 8 | 31 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 |
| Nov 22 | vs. | L 10–33 | 11 | 51 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 1 |
2024 Utah Tech 9 games, 185 rushing yards, 1 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Rush yds | Rush TD | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31 | vs. | L 7–31 | 2 | 13 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Sep 7 | at | L 14–72 | 5 | 14 | 0 | 5 | 46 | 1 |
| Sep 14 | vs. | L 17–45 | 13 | 34 | 0 | 3 | 23 | 0 |
| Sep 21 | at | L 14–32 | 5 | 6 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Sep 28 | vs. | L 30–55 | 15 | 44 | 1 | 2 | 37 | 0 |
| Oct 5 | at | L 14–60 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| Oct 12 | at | L 0–42 | 8 | 39 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 0 |
| Nov 16 | vs. | L 31–34 | 4 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Nov 23 | at | L 34–37 | 5 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 0 |
2023 Utah Tech 10 games, 392 rushing yards, 2 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Rush yds | Rush TD | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9 | vs. | L 13–43 | – | – | – | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| Sep 16 | at | W 50–36 | 3 | 10 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Sep 23 | at | L 14–59 | 10 | 62 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Sep 30 | at | L 20–41 | 10 | 78 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Oct 7 | vs. | W 37–31 | 7 | 62 | 2 | – | – | – |
| Oct 21 | at | L 30–31 | 4 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 |
| Oct 28 | vs. | L 30–34 | 9 | 67 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 4 | at | L 7–24 | 7 | 18 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 |
| Nov 11 | at | L 17–30 | 4 | 39 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 0 |
| Nov 18 | vs. | L 16–24 | 7 | 46 | 0 | 1 | −2 | 0 |
2021 California 5 games, 107 rushing yards, 1 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Rush yds | Rush TD | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2 | vs. | L 6–21 | 8 | 51 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| Oct 23 | vs. | W 26–3 | 5 | 24 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Oct 30 | vs. | W 39–25 | 3 | 8 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Nov 20 | at | W 41–11 | 4 | 24 | 1 | – | – | – |
| Nov 27 | at | L 14–42 | 1 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – |
2020 California 1 game, 2 rushing yards
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Rush yds | Rush TD | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15 | at | L 10–34 | 1 | 2 | 0 | – | – | – |
Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.
Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.
