Ohio State at Michigan

• 

  The Washington herald, District of Columbia, October 27, 1907, page 9

  Read the text

  MICHIGAN BEATS OHIO STATE 0ne-sided Game Results in the Score of % to 0. Defeated Team Didn’t Score Even a First DOwn-Brilliant IndiVid- uaI Plays “a Feature. Ann Arbor. Mich, Oct 26.-Last year. after the hardest kind Of play, Michigan was able TO defeat Ohio State only by 6 To-day Michigan overwhelmed the Buck eyes by p 10, 0, making four touchdOwns, AMI having the bail on States 5-yard line when the whistle blew MiChigans work at times was ragged but the team showed great improvement as a whole The defense was superb, and Ohio State did not score a single first down. On one occasion, Darlington ran . yards around Hammond. but one Buck eye was holding Schulz, and another was cIinging 10 Hammond, 50 the ball was brought back Michigan showed versa tility in attack, gaining good distances on the plunging end runs. on side kicking and on forward passes Michigans forward passes were almost invariably successful, and two Of them netted touchdowns. Magofin received the ball and ran 10 and . yards for touch down. The stars Of the game were Rheinschild, Schulz, Hammond, and LoeH Coach Hernsteln. of the Buckeyes, said that Schulz and Rheinschild are two Of the greatest players he has ever seen in a game. He also spoke highly of LoeH Coach Yost is pleased with Hammond, and says he is better at punting than Johnny Garrels ever was His punts are high and enable the Michigan ends to nail the receiver in his tracks. Magoffin was i’ll and did not play up to his usual form. He was taken out of the game in the middle of the second half. Wasmund. at quarter. was somewhat erratio in geneTalship and fumbied several punts. The lineup.

• 

  The Paducah evening sun, Paducah, Ky., October 28, 1907, page 6 (results column)

  Read the text

  FOOTBALL RESULTS. Fast. Carlisle, 20: Pennsylvania, G. Cornell. G; Princeton, 3. Yale, As: villa Nova, 0. Harvard, 8; Springfield Y. NJ. c. A., 5. Brown, “a: Williams. IL. Dartmouth. 10; Amherst. 10. Swarthmore. 10; Gettysburg, 0. Annapolis. II; Lafayette, 0. Western Penna., ~; Bucknell. ,. West Point. 80; Rochester o. Lehigh, 6 Dickinson. c. Haverford. 6; Ursinus, 0. Virginia. 9. North Carolina. 4. Maryland A. c., II; G. Washing ton, 0. 81. Johns. II: +. and NJ, IL. Trinity. 5; Wesleyan, 0. Vermont, 6; Holy Cross. o. Bates. 21; New Hampshire, 0. Mass. A. c., 20: Worcester Poly, o. Rutgers. SO: Delaware. 0. University of Maine. a. Tufts, o. Bowdoin, 5; Colby. o. West. Illinois. Is: Wisconsin, 4. Michigan. 22: Ohio state, 0. Iowa. %; Drake, 4. Nebraska. 22: COLORADO. s. Notre Dame. %; olive.. 4. Missouri, AZ: william Jewell. 0. Ames, II: Cornell College. 0. Beloit, rs: Oshkosh Normal. 6. Monmouth. so; Knox. 0. st. Louis Univ. AZ; Creighton, o. Ripton, II; Carleton. 4. Utah, II; Colorado Mines, II. Hllfsdale, 81: Kalamazoo, 8. Georgia, o: Alabama, 0. Auburn. ~; Georgia Tech, 6. Suwanee, 65; Mississippi, o. Memphis Univ, IS; Union Tech. .. Vanderbilt, 65; Rose Poly, 10. Tulane, l2; Howard, 0. Miami, 10; Central Univ, o. Tennessee, “a; Marysvllle, 0.

Public-domain newspapers from the Library of Congress’s Chronicling America, found through the American Stories dataset (Dell and Harvard, CC BY 4.0). The text is the machine reading of the page, mistakes and all.

Officially, Michigan leads 62–⁠52–⁠6; as played, 62–⁠53–⁠6 in 121 meetings, counting the 112 since this game.