Stanford at USC

Saturday, November 3, 1928

USC beat Stanford 10–⁠0. It was their 10th meeting; after it, USC led the series 6–⁠2–⁠1 in the games on file.

AwayStanford8–⁠3–⁠1 in 1928
0
HomeUSC9–⁠0–⁠1 in 1928
10

FinalHigh 68°F, low 56°FAttendance 80,000

In the newspapers

  • The The Indianapolis times's story: Trojans' Surprise Victory Over Stanford Shocks Far West Fans u S. C. Will Win Pacific Conference Title If California Loses Big Game Nov. "a.

    The Indianapolis times, Indianapolis [Ind.], November 5, 1928, page 11

    Read the text

    Trojans’ Surprise Victory Over Stanford Shocks Far West Fans u S. C. Will Win Pacific Conference Title If California Loses Big Game Nov. “a. ment of suspense, tending toward a thrilling end of the season climax, was injected into the far western football race. California and U. S. c. remained in the conference running today, but to claim a tie with U. S. G. at the end of the season, the Golden Bears must defeat their historic rivals, Stanford, Nov. “a. U. S. G should win the Pacific conference title by virtue of its victory Saturday. Two weeks ago California and U. S. G. battled to a Scoreless tie, but Stanford showed so much power Saturday there is a big pos sibility Pop” Warmers charges will end their season by capturing the big game. The breaks of the game gave U. S. G. its scores Saturday. Stanford fumbled and lost three chances to score in the last half. Before the game, Stanford was rated the favorite by odds as high as 2 to /. California outplayed the Webfeet at every stage Of the game. Only in the final period did oregon get within scoring distance and then the northerners were stopped on the California 35-yard line.

  • The Evening star's story: HoluBeaM z2Eiceton OionZ3e: UBouS0 William and Foot Ball Results

    Evening star, District of Columbia, November 4, 1928, page 83 (results column)

    Read the text

    HoluBeaM z2Eiceton OionZ3e: UBouS0 William and Foot Ball Results Navy, 81; West Virginia Wesleyan, 0. Army. So; De Pauw, IL. NOtre Dame. g.; Penn State, 0. Yale. Is; Dartmouth, 0. Harvard, 80; Lehigh, 0. Colgate, ID: Wabash, 6. Lafayette, 13; Washington and Jeffer- son, Is. Pittsburgh, Is; Syracuse, 0. Amherst. Is; Mass. AggieS, 0. Brown, 6; Holy Cross, 0. Columbia, 0; Cornell, 0. Vermont, O; Norwich, 0. Tufts, o; New Hampshire, 0. Gettysburg, 27; Dickinson, O. Schuylkill, 1G; Temple, Z. BowdOin, IL; Bates, 0. Thiel. s. Allegheny, 6. SwarthmOre, 20; Delaware, 0. Boston u, =; Springfield. 6. Drexel, 46; New York AggieS, 0. Lowell Textile, Z; UpsaIa, 0. Conn. Aggies. 20; Coast Guard, 0. Franklin Marshall, 20; HaverfOrd, Ii. Williams. So; Union, 0. Susquehanna, IS; Pa. Military, 20. Niagara, IL; ClarksOn, 0. st. Francis, 26; st. Vincent, 8. Wesleyan, “a; Trinity. 0. st. Lawrence, 12; Buffalo, 0. Oberlin, 10; Rochester. IL. VilIanova, 20; Buckncll, s. Worcester Tech, “a; Cooper Union, 0. Grove City, IL; Geneva, 6. st. Johns, O; Providence, Q. UrSinus, s.; MuhIenberg, 0. Wagner, 4; Long Island u, 0. st. Johns (AnnapOlis). 13; Juniata, .. Duquesne, 20; Westminster, 6. SOUTH ATLANTIC. North Carolina State, 6; North Carolima, 6. Virginia, 20; Washington and Lee, Is. v. M. l.. 13; Davidson. 0. Richmond, so; Lynchburg, 6. Duke, 80; Meyer, Is. Western Maryland, SO; L0yOla, 0. Emory and Henry, 2S; Tusculum, 0. Furman, 18: Wake Forest, O. Roanoke, 12; Hampden- Sidney, o. Johns Hopkins. “a; Randolph Macon, J. GuiIfOrd. 10; Atlantic Christian, 0. Mount st. Marys, 10; Washington Col lege, 0. High Point, 1s; EIOn, 0. SOUTH. Georgia Tech, 32; Oglethorpe, I. Florida, 81; Sewanee, 6. Mississippi, 26; Clemson, :. Vanderbilt, IA; Kentucky, :. Georgia, Is; Auburn, 0. Tulane, 81; MillsapS, 0. Southern MethOdists, 6; Texas, 2. Chattanooga, 80; Southwestern, 0. Tennessee, 81; Carson Newman, 0. Miami. 81: Rollins. 3. Southwestern Louisiana, 45; Louisiana / Tech, 6. Atlanta L., IL; Moorehousc, :. Texas A. & M, Al; North Texas Teach ] crs, 0. / RayIor. :: Texas Christian. 6 LOyola New Orleans), %; st. Ed wards, O. Spring Hills, rs; Union. 6. Birmingham Southern, 0; Centenary, 0. Arkansas, Z; Louisiana s. u, 0. Southwestern u, IA; Rice, 6. East Tennessee Normal Is; Hiwassee, 6. Center, 20; Marshall, 0. Tuskegee, 13; Fisk, Z. Georgetown (Ky), ii; Kentucky Wes- leyan, s. MIDWEST. Ohio State, 6; Princeton, 6. Pennsylvania, 20; Chicago, Is. Michigan, 8; Illinois, 0. Wisconsin, Is; Alabama, 0. Northwestern, 10; Minnesota, Q. Iowa State, Is; Oklahoma, o. Nebraska, 20; Kansas, O. Purdue, 10; Case. 0. Drake, 6; Missouri, 0. Haskell Indians, Z; Washington L., 0. Iowa, 49,; South Dakota, 0. Grinnell, 20; Marquette, Is. North Central, Is; Mount Morris, 0. Illinois College, 13; State Normal, o. SpearfiSh Normal, Is; Southern Nor nal. 0. Heidelberg, rs; Capital, Z. Iowa Wesleyan, 10; Penn College, 0. South Dakota State, IS; Creighton, I. Columbus. IA; Augustana, 8. COe. 10; Cornell, 0. Butler, 12; Muncie Normal, 6. Bowling Green. 12; Defiance, IL. Indiana State Normal, 19; Franklin, 0. Hanover, 80; Bethel, 0. Detroit City College, 13; Toledo. 6. Marietta, IA: Muskingum. Is. Indiana Central. IL; Earlham, 6. Oakland City, II: Rose Poly. 8. St. Xavier, 10; Kansas Wesleyan, 0. Michigan State. s; Mississippi A. & NJ, 6. Western Reserve, So; Akron, o. John Carroll, IL; Adrian, 0. Wilberforce. 6; Knoxville. s. North Dakota State, 12; MOrningside, 0. Miami. 20; Ohio u. Is. Wesleyan, As; Wooster. 6. Dayton, l2; LOyOla (ChicagO), !. RipOn, “a; Lawrence, 0. Hamiinc, s.; CareIton, 0. Parsons, 8; Columbia, o. DePaul, 81: Minnesota B., IA. Augsburg. “a; St. Johns, 0. Kissing Juniors, 81; ItaSca Juniors, 0. Augustana, IA; Monmouth, 0. Bradley Tech. 35; Marquette, 20. Carroll, Z; Lombard, 6. Detroit, So; st. Louis, 0. FAR WEST. Southern California. 10; Stanford, 0. Washington State. rs; Idaho, 0. Oregon State, a.; Montana, 0. California, Is; Oregon. 0. Washington, 40; Puget Sound, 0. California Aggics, 6; Nevada, 0. Olympic Club. 20; Santa Clara, 1S. Oklahoma City u. 8; Oklahoma Ag gieS. 0. Mount st. Charles. So; Montana ! Mines, 0. Utah IT,. 27; Colorado College, 81. Denver, 26; Wyoming, I. ROBBERS GET BIG SUM FROM FOOT BALL GAME ! LAWRENCE, Kans.. November 8

  • The The Washington times's story

    The Washington times, Washington [D.C.], November 5, 1928, page 16 (results column)

    Read the text

    Stanford passed quietly away out on the coast, Illinois left itself only fighting chance for the big ten title and Nebraska and Southern Methodist plastered chattel mort cages on the championships OF the big sir and southwest respectively. Only the south failed to produce anything that could be deemed a climax. in consequence Of which Georgia Tech, Vanderbilt, Florida and tennessee remain the recognized authorities, with Georgia also well placed as far as the actual conference race is concerned. Because of this teams defeat by Yale, an ultimate Georgia victory would deprecate Southern prestige, which was done no great good on Saturday when Alabama blew an intersectional decision to Wisconsin. The major developments Of the day, listed in the order OE their Importance, might be named as follows: Southern California, 10; Stanford, 0. Michigan, 3; Illinois, O.. Prince ton. s; Ohio State. s. Georgetown, Il: N. Y. u, 2. Northwestern, 10; Minnesota, 3. wisconsin, IS: Ala bama, o. Drake, s.; Missouri, O.. Southern Methodist, s: Texas. 2. The Illinois defeat, well-earned by the Zuppke outfit apparently, left the Ohio Stafe-Iowa game as the great convincer of the Big Ten race. The winner of the game, of course. isn’t compelled to win the conference title but one thing is certain. 1t won’t lose the title. So much for the Middle West, except to mention that Minnesota is out by two points, one each in the Iowa and Northwestern games. New York University passed into the limbo Of footballs for gotten on It’s inability to sum- mon a final punch inside the 5-yard line. still, defense and OppOrtunism are integral parts Of the racket and so Georgetown must be figured as the Army’s main rival for eastern hOnOfs at the moment, with Princeton, Boston College, VilIanOva and Carnegie Tech i’m the secondary group. Princeton, of course, was a much improved outfit on Saturday, so this ranking is no slight of Ohio State prestige or that of the Big Ten in gen. eral. In fact, il Princeton beats Yale they won’t be able to read the Tiger out of eastern consideration with the aid OF a loud speaker. Eastern ! and conference prestige broke right

Public-domain newspapers from the Library of Congress’s Chronicling America, found through the American Stories dataset (Dell and Harvard, CC BY 4.0). The text is the machine reading of the page, mistakes and all.

Before kickoff

Our ratings going in

Our ratings (scores only)

USC 73% to win. Elo’s favorite won.

Officially, USC leads 65–⁠34–⁠3; as played, 66–⁠33–⁠3 in the 102 games on file; the official count covers all 103 meetings, counting the 93 since this game.

Recent meetings
2023USC 56, Stanford 10
2022USC 41, Stanford 28
2021Stanford 42, USC 28
2019USC 45, Stanford 20
2018Stanford 17, USC 3
2017USC 31, Stanford 28Pac-12 Championship Game

Around this game

Stanford

USC