Wesleyan (CT) at Columbia

Saturday, October 14, 1922

Columbia beat Wesleyan (CT) 10–⁠6. It was their seventh meeting; after it, Columbia led the series 5–⁠1–⁠1.

AwayWesleyan (CT)0–⁠1 in 1922
6
HomeColumbia5–⁠4 in 1922
10

Final

In the newspapers

  • The The New York herald's story: ONE TOUCHDOWN FOR LOCAL COLLEGIANS Most of Blue and White Threats Are Not Sus- tanned. RODERICK'S FIELD GOAL Clinchcs Victory After Metho- dists Score With Aid Of Costly Penalty.

    The New York herald, New York, October 15, 1922, page 53

    Read the text

    ONE TOUCHDOWN FOR LOCAL COLLEGIANS Most of Blue and White Threats Are Not Sus- tanned. RODERICK’S FIELD GOAL Clinchcs Victory After Methodists Score With Aid Of Costly Penalty. by SAMUEL j. RROOFMAN. Still crude in concerted action and in so essential fundamental as tackling, but flashing latent power that augurs Columbia’s ponderous eleven defeated n comparatively light bat courageous Wesleyan team by a score of 10 to 6 at South Field yesterday 1t was the third straight victory of the season for the Blue and White, but unlike the other two a hard earned victory over a squad than shone almost as gloriously in defeat as the victors did in triumph Up to a minute or so before the tussle ended, Columbia’s margin was a single point-no more. A tumble, a fortunate dash. any sort of break might have turned the tide toward the Tigers of New England” as the Methodists are being called this season. Columbia had gained more ground, had threatened more often, had outplayed Wesleyan by clear if nv wv bSNioiNC pul Tic ldCl remained that the Blue and Whites lead was frail. that it could be over , come by a single play. Little wonder then that the faces of the 10000 Columbia rooters showed sub dued anxiety as the contest neared its close. Little wonder that hearts beat like trip hammers whenever a scramble ensued for a fumbled ball or for for ward pass in which Wesleyan had everything to gain and nothing to lose There were trying moments for the Co. lumbia supporters in that final half Wesleyan had marched with the aid OF penalties siXty-five yards for touch down in the third period, and what Wesleyan had accomplished once Wesleyan might readily repeat. Who could tell? Anxious Moments. The Columbians had not scored since the opening period. True, they had been dangerous all the way, but they never had been able to carry out their threat. The Blue and White had just made an other sixty yard squirt, but had failed within the shadows of the Wesleyan goal posts. Nothing daunted. the Blue and White had advanced again to within twenty yards OF score, but here again Wesleyan’s defense had stiffened Scarcely more than a minute or two remained. and then Columbia threatened with the loss of the ball called for a kick from placement. 1t went through perfectly. Rodericll booting the oval clear over the cross bar from the 30 ward line A wild shout from the CO. lumbia cohorts, who had waited long time for their anxiety to be relieved Another kickoff. three or four plays and the game was over. Wesleyan’s march 10 touchdown shortly after the opening of the second half was as unexpected as II was brill liant The lighter line had been COM pletely outplayed in the first two periods. Koppisch and Roderick had darted past tackles and around end for substantial gains and Gehrig had ploughed through the line every now and then for an aver age OF five yards at a try as the Blue and White advanced TO its first touch down. The steam roller had moved into action again in the second quarter and after another prolonged assault had rolled the enemy back TO Its 4 yard line. Another touchdown had seemed imminent But this time the pluclSy Methodists had fought like fury with their backs almost against their goal posts and had taken the ball on downs by a matter of inches only. Once out of dan ger. Wesleyan had held the swift Co Iumbia backs in check. but they had been fighting a more or less defensive fight, and not once had the visitors come any nearer than forty-five yards OF Columbias goal. But IL was vastly different In the second half in which the Mcthodists scored as many first downs as the Co lumbians. Finding unexpected holes in the Columbia line and profiting by their opponents uncertain tackling, the Wesleyan eleven took the aggressive and carried the ball all the way from their own 35 yard line to a touchdown. A severe penalty hurt the Columbians considerably In the last stages of che adj vance. Robson. Adams and Frlcke had done some great work in finding OPEN ings and In eluding tacklers, but the Blue and White team was beginning TO fathom the attack Costly Penalty. Sixteen yards from che Columbia line three tries at the Blue and White for wards failed TO gain more than two yards. Meyer at right guard seemed 10 be pretty we’ll spent and Coach O’Neill sent Hinch I’m to relieve him in the Columbia line at that point. But Hlnch came running In TO the scrimmage after the whistle had blown for the play and fifteen yard penalty that ensued brought the ball within single stride OF the Columbia goal. II was vexing turn of affair for tho Columbia rooters and they sat silent as Wesleyan on the next rush carried the ball over. A minute later however. the Blue and White stands broke into triumphant cheers again as Fricke failed TO gain the point after touchdown. His attempt at q drop kick was bIoled end tho oval never rose more than seven feet off the ground. Columbia was still in the lead. after all, and there was no Confined on Pare Three.

  • The Richmond times-dispatch. (Richmond, Va.) 1914-current's story: FOOTBALL RESULTS %; Case. 0.

    Richmond times-dispatch. (Richmond, Va.) 1914-current, Virginia, October 15, 1922, page 41 (results column)

    Read the text

    FOOTBALL RESULTS %; Case. 0. University of Pennsylvania. H.: University ~ Maryland. 0. Brown. .: Syracuse. O. Bates. Z; Colby. I. Notre Dame. 20. Purdue. o. University OF Detroit .. Des Moines, 6. Centre. 10; V. T.. l.. 6. Iowa. s: Yale. o. Army. 10. Alabama 6 Columbia. 10. Wesleyan. 6. North Carolina state. -. Roanoke. Davidson. s: Wake Forest. S. Vanderbilt. o: Michigan. .. University OF Tennessee, 10: In fantry School 0. Harvard, 10. Bowdoin. 0. Cincinnati University. o. George town. a. Rochester. !. Wes,minstcr. 0. Lafayette. So: Nuremberg. y. MINNESOTA, 90 Indiana. o. Wisconsin. 20. South Dakota AZ giles, ). Rensselaer, 20; 81. Lawrence. q. Oberiin, o: Ohio state. “a Maine. u; Norwich. o. Massachusetts Angles. %; Worccster Tech. q Dartmouth. 81: M:ddlcbury. o. amherst. Is. thlon, y. Gettysburg. -; Susuunhanna. 6. Washington and Jefferson. :, Car nee!e Tech. :. Georgia. :. Furman. q. Georgia Tech. AZ Alabama. I. West Virginia. .: University OF PittshurEh. s. Sewanee. 10; OSlethorpc. o. ouvhi’a College. u; University Of Arkansas = Exeter, -. Yaic Freshmen. q. University Of Virginia, “a. uuiversity Of Richmond s Princeton, 10. Colgate. o Florida. 10 Rollins. q. Columbia Freshmen. 30; Newberry Freshmen. O. Navy. IA. Buckn.l. 7. Chicago. -. southwestern. !. Butler 10: Illinois, 4 Johns Hopkins, 40. George Wash ington. 6. Catholic Universi,y. I; Washington College, 3 Pennsylvania o. Wilmington. So. Trinity. 81. Havr” Ford. H. wabash. 90: Michigan Aggies. 0. Mount Union, Is. Heidelberg. q. Penn STATE. az: Lebanon Valley. s. Springfield College. ci. Connecticu, Agricultural Collage. :. Vermont. :: Boston University. u. Illinois Wesleyan. 3. Augus,ana. Grinnsli. %; 81. Louis University. u. Toledo University. o; Alma tMich) College, o. Holy Cross. IL, Villa Nova, O. Hobart. 20: New Yorh universilly, 0. Cornell. So New Hampshire. I. M tel Bethany. IL; Grove city. o. Albright. IA: Penn Military. s. Marietta. :. Marshall. @. Kunaio. J; Thi”!. -. S~arthmnre. :. Dickinson, - Frank and Marsh. IS. Mt. 81. Mkrys. o. wi,,enours, “a; western Reserve. 6. Belot College, %; northwestern College. o. Missouri. E: Ame. }. Drake. &; Kansas. q Creighton University. 81. Iowa Wesleyan. Z King college. “a; Tuscu!um. :. University ~ Tennessee Medical College :: Union University. 6. University OF Kentucky, -; Uni rtrsi,y OF Louisville. o. wesleyan College. IA; Georgetown College. Is. North Carolina. To- South Carolina. { lynchburg High. a.: Salem High. 6 Fishhurnc Military Academy. 6. Virginia Episcopal. 0. V NJ. l.. 81; Morris Harvey. o. Washington and Lee, 10. Carson Newman. = University Of chattanooga. 81: Emory and Henry. o. Texas Christian University, :: simmons College. uict. Southern Methodist University, 81: Louisiana state. q. Tulane. 80: Springhiil, 10.

  • The South Bend news-times's story: RUSHING IRISH ATTACK BEATS PURDUE, 2O--O Football Results

    South Bend news-times, South Bend, Ind., October 15, 1922, page 1 (results column)

    Read the text

    RUSHING IRISH ATTACK BEATS PURDUE, 2O--O Football Results Notre Dame 20; Purdue o. Minnesota 20. Indiana o. Iowa o Yale 0. Chicago 10; Northwestern Z. Butler 10; Illinois Z. Army 10. Alabama Poly 8. Wisconsin 20; South Dakota o Georgia Tech 3S: Alabama =. Rensselaer, 20; 81. Lawrence 0. Harvard Is: Bowdoin o. West Virginia Q; L. of Pitts burg g.. Rochester Z; West minister o. Lafayette o.. Muhlenberg O. Culver SO; Great Lakes 0. Vanderbilt 0; Michigan o. Trinity p; HaveCford “A. Navy Il; Bucknell 7 Mt. Union Is; Heidelberg o. Princeton 10; Colgate 0. Cornell IS, New Hampshire state Z. Rutgers Is; Lehign 6. Bethany IA; Grove City 0. Albright Is: Penn Military s. Holy Cross “A; Villa Nova 0. Hobart 20; New York university 0. Stevens o: Hamilton o. Beloit College 80; Northwestern college o. Missouri 6: Ames 3. Drake 6; Kansas 0. , Creighton univ .: Iowa Wesleyan Z. Sewanee 10; Oglethorpe 0. Illinois Wesleyan 8; Augustana 0. Grinnell %: St. Louis univ 0. Toledo univ. o; Alma college 0. -Earlham 6; Rose Poly o. Wabash %; Michigan Aggies 0. Cincinnati univ. o; Georgetown 81. Oberlin 0; Ohio State Il. Maine -; Norwich o. Massachusetts Aggies %: Worcester Tech o. Dartmouth 21: Middlebury O. Amherst IS; Union o. Allegheny 50; Niagara o. Washington and jefferson z; Car negie Tech Z. Penn State 80; Lebanon Valley 6. Springfield college “a; Connect cut Agricultural Z. Vermont Z; Boston university 0. Johns Hopkins 4; George Wash ngton g. Catholic university z; Washing ton college 3. Columbia 10; Wesleyan 6. Wooster 27: Case Q. Brown o; Syracuse 0. Bates 7; Colby T. Univ. of Detroit Q: Des Moines s. Univ. of Pennsylvania u; Univ Of Maryland 0. Univ of North Carolina 10; Uriv. Of South Carolina Z. Franklin o: Hanover o. Univ. of Georgia Z; Furman o. Tniv. of Virginia IA; Univ. Of Richmond S. Southern Methodist univ. 81; Louisiana State o. Colorado Aggies so; Wyoming univ 0. Depauw z; Lake Forest 6. Miami 20; Akron o. Ohio univ. Z: Denison O. Ohio Wesleyan “A, Ohio North arn 0. Kansas Aggies %: Washington Il. Texas Aggies 30; Southwestern 0. North Dakota z; South Dakota 0. St Thomas. p; St. Johns o. Hamline 10; Cornell 0. Texas univ. 10: Oklahoma Ag- 5ies Z. Depauw Z; Lake Forest {. Baylor L. 81; Rice Institute 0. Institute of Tech, 9 Whittier Col ege g. santa Clara. 0; Stanford. 7. St. Mary’s college. o; Univ. Of Il. Univ. of Kentucky 81: Univ Of ,0uisville. o. Denver university. 3; Nebraska Wesleyan, O. Yankton, 3; Morningside. =. Trinity. 26: Omaha university 8. Howard college. o; Mississippi A. and NJ, O. (tied) Univ. of Southern California. IS; -niv. of Arizona 0. Idaho, o; Washington, ?. Tufts 6; williams, 0. (Soccer) Harvard, 3; Amherst, 0.

  • The The Pensacola journal's story: Football Results

    The Pensacola journal, Pensacola, Fla., October 15, 1922, page 8 (results column)

    Read the text

    Football Results p. II. s. :: Quincy 19. Florida 10; Rollins 0. Florida Freshmen 6; Auburn Fresh men 0. Iowa 6: Yale 0. Columbia 10; Wesleyan 6. Centre 10; V. p. I. 6. sewanee 10; Oglethorpe 0. Navy IA; Bucknell :, . . .. Chicago 10; Northwestern :. wabash %; Michigan Aggies o. West Virginia 3; University Of Pitts burg G. ~--- Oberlin 0; Ohio State II. Dartmouth 81: Middiebury 0. Washington jefferson Z; Carnegie Tech z. North Carolina 10; South Carolina :. University of Tenn. Is; Infantry School 0. washington and Lee 10; Carson New man 7. Harvard II; Bodwoin 0. Wisconsin 20; South Dakota Aggies s. Penn State 50; Lebanon Valley s. Vermont I; Boston University o. Y. NJ I. GO; Morris Harvey 0. South Carolina Freshmen ~ New berry Freshmen 0. Georgia Tech SO; Alabama :. Princeton 10; Colgate 0. University Of Kentucky rs; University of Louisville 0. Holy Cross IA; Villa Nova o. Hobart 20; New York University 0. Cornell IS; New Hampshire Z. Rutgers 10; Lehigh 6. University of Chattanooga. So; Emor! and Henry 0. p, - Southern Methodlst CillNei Louisiana State Q. Tulane 80; Spring Hill TO- swarthmoro Z; Dickinson p. University of Pennsylvania j.; Uni yersity of Maryland 0. Brown 0; Syracuse o. Notre Dame 20; Perdue o.. Georgia Z Furman D. Davidson 6: Wake Forest D. Virginia IA; University oil Rlch’lloi’”

Public-domain newspapers from the Library of Congress’s Chronicling America, found through the American Stories dataset (Dell and Harvard, CC BY 4.0). The text is the machine reading of the page, mistakes and all.

Before kickoff

Our ratings going in

Our ratings (scores only)

Columbia 82% to win. Elo’s favorite won.

Columbia leads 14–⁠1–⁠1 in 16 meetings, counting the nine since this game.

Recent meetings
1931Columbia 37, Wesleyan (CT) 0
1930Columbia 48, Wesleyan (CT) 0
1929Columbia 52, Wesleyan (CT) 0
1928Columbia 31, Wesleyan (CT) 7
1927Columbia 28, Wesleyan (CT) 0
1926Columbia 41, Wesleyan (CT) 0

Around this game

Wesleyan (CT)