2025 Stanford

4–⁠8 (3–⁠5 Atlantic Coast Conference), coached by Frank Reich.

Schedule and results

Stanford in 2025, game by game: lost at Hawai’i 20–23; lost at BYU 3–27; won vs. Boston College 30–20; lost at Virginia 20–48; won vs. San José State 30–29; lost at SMU 10–34; won vs. Florida State 20–13; lost at No. 9 Miami 7–42; lost vs. Pittsburgh 20–35; lost at North Carolina 15–20; won vs. California 31–10; lost vs. No. 9 Notre Dame 20–49+21−35Lost 20–23 at Hawai’i-3Hawai’iLost 3–27 at BYU-24BYUWon 30–20 vs. Boston College+10Boston CollegeLost 20–48 at Virginia-28VirginiaWon 30–29 vs. San José State+1San José StateLost 10–34 at SMU-24SMUWon 20–13 vs. Florida State+7Florida StateLost 7–42 at No. 9 Miami-35No. 9 MiamiLost 20–35 vs. Pittsburgh-15PittsburghLost 15–20 at North Carolina-5North CarolinaWon 31–10 vs. California+21CaliforniaLost 20–49 vs. No. 9 Notre Dame-29No. 9 Notre Dame
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Lost to Notre Dame 49–⁠20; unranked in the final AP poll; 12th in the Atlantic Coast Conference.

In program history: The 93rd-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 109 on file).

Record
4–⁠8
Conference
3–⁠5 12th in Atlantic Coast Conference
AP final
Unranked
Points
226–⁠350
Coach
Frank Reich
Elo
1406 +7 this season
SP+ rating
-11.8 No. 112 of 136; offense No. 117, defense No. 78, special teams No. 125
SRS
−4.1 No. 86 of 136 in FBS
Returning
19% of last season’s EPA, No. 100 of 134
Recruiting class
No. 56 roster talent No. 46 in FBS
Offensive coordinator
Nate Byham
Defensive coordinators
Bobby April and Andy Thompson
Offense
Pro-style
Defense
2–⁠4–⁠5

How good, play by play

  • Offense109th of 136
  • Defense90th of 136
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted95th of 136
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted73rd of 136
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.0037%1.22109th of 136
Defense0.1543%1.3490th of 136
Opponent-adjusted0.04 off
0.11 def
39% off
41% def
—95th off
73rd def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense40%8.4 yds11%2.8016%
Defense45%8.2 yds11%3.0015%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense3.0own 2517% allowed
Defense3.5own 3015% caused

CORE rating -4.8, 82nd of 136 (offense -5.5, defense -0.7).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsBen Gulbranson QB1,813 yds
Passing touchdownsBen Gulbranson QB9 TD
Rushing yardsMicah Ford RB643 yds
Rushing touchdownsMicah Ford RB4 TD
Receiving yardsC.J. Williams WR757 yds
Receiving touchdownsC.J. Williams WR6 TD
TacklesMatt Rose LB106 tkl
SacksClay Patterson DL4 sacks
InterceptionsBrandon Nicholson CB2 INT

Top recruits in the 2025 class

JonAnthony Hall WR★★★★No. 196
Bear Bachmeier QB★★★★No. 425
Gabe Kaminski DE★★★No. 563
Adam Shovlin DL★★★No. 606
Josh Williams OL★★★No. 619

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2025 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks14.00.893
Receivers33.30.887
Offensive line23.00.873
Defensive line33.00.881
Linebackers23.00.875
Defensive backs43.00.857
Athletes and specialists23.00.839
Whole class173.10.871

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Drafted in 2026

The 2026 draft
Rd 3Sam Roush TEChicago Bears
Rd 6C.J. Williams WRJacksonville Jaguars

Roster 108

The 2025 roster

108 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2025 line; 68 have a stat line. See the roster

2025 Atlantic Coast Conference standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
Virginia7–⁠211–⁠316
Miami6–⁠213–⁠32
SMU6–⁠29–⁠4
Georgia Tech6–⁠29–⁠4
Duke6–⁠29–⁠5
Pittsburgh6–⁠28–⁠5
NC State5–⁠48–⁠5
Louisville4–⁠49–⁠4
Wake Forest4–⁠49–⁠4
Clemson4–⁠47–⁠6
California4–⁠47–⁠6
Stanford3–⁠54–⁠8
Florida State2–⁠65–⁠7
North Carolina2–⁠64–⁠8
Virginia Tech2–⁠63–⁠9
Syracuse1–⁠73–⁠9
Boston College1–⁠72–⁠10

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.