2026 North Dakota State

6–⁠1 (3–⁠1 Mountain West Conference), coached by Tim Polasek. The season’s Wikipedia article records 5–⁠1, over six games to the seven on file here.

Schedule and results

North Dakota State in 2026, game by game: won vs. Jacksonville State 33–7; won vs. Fordham 38–0; won at Air Force 38–32; won at Sacramento State 31–10; won vs. Wyoming 28–0; lost at UNLV 7–13; won vs. Nevada 31–17+38−6Won 33–7 vs. Jacksonville State+26Jacksonville St…Won 38–0 vs. Fordham+38FordhamWon 38–32 at Air Force+6Air ForceWon 31–10 at Sacramento State+21Sacramento StateWon 28–0 vs. Wyoming+28WyomingLost 7–13 at UNLV-6UNLVWon 31–17 vs. Nevada+14Nevada
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

Record
6–⁠1
Conference
3–⁠1 tied for 2nd in Mountain West Conference
AP now
Unranked
Points
206–⁠79
Coach
Tim Polasek
Elo
1609 +60 this season
SP+ rating
8.6 No. 43 of 138; offense No. 80, defense No. 20, special teams No. 29
SRS
3.1 No. 56 of 138 in FBS
Recruiting class
No. 117 roster talent No. 131 in FBS
Offensive coordinator
Dan Larson
Defensive coordinator
Grant Olson
Offense
Multiple pro-style
Defense
Multiple 4–⁠3

How good, play by play

  • Offense74th of 138
  • Defense6th of 138
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted75th of 138
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted7th of 138
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.1040%1.3374th of 138
Defense-0.1037%1.096th of 138
Opponent-adjusted0.09 off
-0.01 def
40% off
40% def
—75th off
7th def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense46%10.0 yds18%3.1016%
Defense37%9.0 yds14%2.8017%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense3.6own 3014% allowed
Defense2.0own 2817% caused

CORE rating 9.7, 28th of 138 (offense -0.4, defense -10.1).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsNathan Hayes QB1,272 yds
Passing touchdownsNathan Hayes QB10 TD
Rushing yardsMyles Mitchell RB354 yds
Rushing touchdownsD.J. Scott RB4 TD
Receiving yardsJackson Williams WR432 yds
Receiving touchdownsMekhi Collins WR3 TD
TacklesDonovan Woolen LB51 tkl
SacksKelton McCaslin DE5 sacks
InterceptionsMarion Moore CB4 INT

Top recruits in the 2026 class

Braylon Toliver ATH★★★No. 1566
Gunner Thielges S★★★No. 1566
Kye Schlichting ATH★★★No. 1566
Myles Ellis WR★★★No. 2052
Brandon Walton ATH★★★No. 2052

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2026 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Running backs13.00.840
Receivers33.00.840
Offensive line33.00.847
Defensive line33.00.825
Linebackers13.00.830
Defensive backs53.00.840
Athletes and specialists33.00.857
Whole class193.00.841

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Roster 130

The 2026 roster

130 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2026 line; 64 have a stat line. See the roster

2026 Mountain West Conference standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
New Mexico2–⁠05–⁠1
North Dakota State3–⁠16–⁠1
Air Force3–⁠15–⁠1
Wyoming3–⁠14–⁠3
UNLV2–⁠14–⁠3
San José State2–⁠14–⁠3
Nevada1–⁠22–⁠4
Hawai’i0–⁠41–⁠6
UTEP0–⁠31–⁠6
Northern Illinois0–⁠20–⁠6

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.