CollegeFootballDigestfrom CooperSearch

Massachusetts football money

In 2024-25, Massachusetts football brought in $13.4 million and spent $13.4 million, the 98th-most revenue of 124 FBS programs. That’s $6.7 million for each of its 2 wins. 111 players were on the roster, with 14 assistant coaches.

Revenue and expenses

2012: revenue $6.9 million2012: expenses $6.9 million’122013: revenue $7.8 million2013: expenses $7.8 million2014: revenue $7.0 million2014: expenses $7.0 million’142015: revenue $8.6 million2015: expenses $8.6 million2016: revenue $10.5 million2016: expenses $10.5 million’162017: revenue $10.0 million2017: expenses $10.0 million2018: revenue $10.3 million2018: expenses $10.3 million’182019: revenue $10.2 million2019: expenses $10.2 million2020: revenue $8.4 million2020: expenses $8.4 million’202021: revenue $10.7 million2021: expenses $10.7 million2022: revenue $11.2 million2022: expenses $11.2 million’222023: revenue $11.5 million2023: expenses $11.5 million2024: revenue $13.4 million2024: expenses $13.4 million’24

Revenue Expenses (top: $13.4M)

Beside the FBS Independents, 2024-25

3rd of 3 in revenue
  1. Notre Dame$196M / $93.3M
  2. UConn$20.5M / $20.5M
  3. Massachusetts$13.4M / $13.4M

Each member’s football revenue (the thick bar) and expenses (the thin one under it) that year, as the schools reported them; schools count revenue differently.

Against the Mid-American

revenue, 2012-13 to 2024-25

  1. Buffalo

    $14.1M in 24–⁠25

  2. Massachusetts

    $13.4M in 24–⁠25

  3. Toledo

    $12.6M in 24–⁠25

  4. Central Michigan

    $11.6M in 24–⁠25

  5. Western Michigan

    $11.4M in 24–⁠25

  6. Eastern Michigan

    $11.1M in 24–⁠25

  7. Miami (OH)

    $11.0M in 24–⁠25

  8. Ohio

    $10.8M in 24–⁠25

  9. Kent State

    $10.4M in 24–⁠25

  10. Sacramento State

    $10.1M in 24–⁠25

  11. Ball State

    $8.0M in 24–⁠25

  12. Akron

    $7.6M in 24–⁠25

Each program’s football revenue by season, as each school reports it (EADA), on one scale (top: $14.1M), for the programs in the Mid-American this season, most revenue first; Massachusetts in its color.

By season

SeasonRevenueExpensesRecordSpent a winRankRosterAssistants
2024-25$13.4M$13.4M2–⁠10$6.7M98 of 12411114
2023-24$11.5M$11.5M3–⁠9$3.8M104 of 12510714
2022-23$11.2M$11.2M1–⁠11$11.2M101 of 12311114
2021-22$10.7M$10.7M1–⁠11$10.7M94 of 12210914
2020-21$8.4M$8.4M0–⁠499 of 12011013
2019-20$10.2M$10.2M1–⁠11$10.2M97 of 12311514
2018-19$10.3M$10.3M4–⁠8$2.6M95 of 12310713
2017-18$10.0M$10.0M4–⁠8$2.5M95 of 12311314
2016-17$10.5M$10.5M2–⁠10$5.2M87 of 12111413
2015-16$8.6M$8.6M3–⁠9$2.9M97 of 12212313
2014-15$7.0M$7.0M3–⁠9$2.3M106 of 12211012
2013-14$7.8M$7.8M1–⁠11$7.8M91 of 12211513
2012-13$6.9M$6.9M1–⁠11$6.9M96 of 11910411

As University of Massachusetts-Amherst reports them to the US Department of Education under the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act (ope.ed.gov/athletics). Schools count revenue differently (some include institutional support), so compare with care. “Spent a win” is the year’s football expenses over that season’s wins. Rank is football revenue among programs in the same division that season. Browse every school’s in the data.