2022 Houston

8–⁠5 (5–⁠3 American Athletic Conference), coached by Dana Holgorsen.

Schedule and results

Houston in 2022, game by game: won at UTSA 37–35; lost at Texas Tech 30–33; lost vs. Kansas 30–48; won vs. Rice 34–27; lost vs. Tulane 24–27; won at Memphis 33–32; won at Navy 38–20; won vs. South Florida 42–27; lost at SMU 63–77; won vs. Temple 43–36; won at East Carolina 42–3; lost vs. Tulsa 30–37; won vs. Louisiana 23–16+39−18Won 37–35 at UTSA+2UTSALost 30–33 at Texas Tech-3Texas TechLost 30–48 vs. Kansas-18KansasWon 34–27 vs. Rice+7RiceLost 24–27 vs. Tulane-3TulaneWon 33–32 at Memphis+1MemphisWon 38–20 at Navy+18NavyWon 42–27 vs. South Florida+15South FloridaLost 63–77 at SMU-14SMUWon 43–36 vs. Temple+7TempleWon 42–3 at East Carolina+39East CarolinaLost 30–37 vs. Tulsa-7TulsaWon 23–16 vs. Louisiana+7Louisiana
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.
DateOpponentResultElo
Sep 3atUTSAW 37–⁠3550%
Sep 10atTexas TechL 30–⁠3355%
Sep 17vsKansasL 30–⁠4881%
Sep 24vsRiceW 34–⁠2772%
Sep 30vsTulaneL 24–⁠2769%
Oct 7atMemphisW 33–⁠3238%
Oct 22atNavyW 38–⁠2057%
Oct 29vsSouth FloridaW 42–⁠2785%
Nov 5atSMUL 63–⁠7745%
Nov 12vsTempleW 43–⁠3683%
Nov 19atEast CarolinaW 42–⁠342%
Nov 26vsTulsaL 30–⁠3779%
Dec 23vsLouisianaIndependence BowlW 23–⁠1650%

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Beat Louisiana 23–⁠16 in the Independence Bowl; unranked in the final AP poll; tied for 4th in the American Athletic Conference.

In program history: The 26th-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 81 on file).

AP poll, week by week

  1. Wk 1: 24
  2. Wk 2: 25

Led the nationTank Dell: receiving yards (1,398 yds), receiving touchdowns (17 TD)

Record
8–⁠5
Conference
5–⁠3 tied for 4th in American Athletic Conference
AP final
Unranked peak No. 24
Points
469–⁠418
Coach
Dana Holgorsen
Elo
1592 −16 this season
SP+ rating
4.5 No. 57 of 131; offense No. 9, defense No. 112, special teams No. 71
SRS
2.9 No. 57 of 131 in FBS
Returning
77% of last season’s EPA, No. 25 of 130
Recruiting class
No. 50 roster talent No. 58 in FBS
Offensive coordinators
Shannon Dawson and Brandon Jones
Defensive coordinator
Doug Belk
Offense
Spread
Defense
4–⁠2–⁠5

How good, play by play

  • Offense9th of 131
  • Defense84th of 131
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted16th of 131
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted77th of 131
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.2647%1.299th of 131
Defense0.1443%1.3584th of 131
Opponent-adjusted0.22 off
0.12 def
46% off
43% def
—16th off
77th def
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense4.8own 3015% allowed
Defense3.9own 3019% caused

CORE rating 9.7, 24th of 131 (offense 12.6, defense 3.0).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsClayton Tune QB4,074 yds
Passing touchdownsClayton Tune QB40 TD
Rushing yardsClayton Tune QB547 yds
Rushing touchdownsClayton Tune QB5 TD
Receiving yardsNathaniel Dell WR1,398 yds
Receiving touchdownsNathaniel Dell WR17 TD
TacklesDonavan Mutin LB78 tkl
SacksD’Anthony Jones DL6 sacks
InterceptionsArt Green DB2 INT

Top recruits in the 2022 class

Matthew Golden WR★★★★No. 210
Demetrius Hunter OL★★★No. 501
Trent McGaughey TE★★★No. 690
Quardale Patt DL★★★No. 720
C.J. Nelson WR★★★No. 774

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2022 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Receivers43.30.873
Offensive line33.00.863
Defensive line23.00.869
Linebackers13.00.862
Defensive backs13.00.857
Athletes and specialists13.00.828
Whole class123.10.864

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Drafted in 2023

The 2023 draft
Rd 3Nathaniel Dell WRHouston Texans
Rd 5Clayton Tune QBArizona Cardinals
Rd 7Derek Parish FBJacksonville Jaguars
Rd 7Gervarrius Owens SNew York Giants

Roster 108

The 2022 roster

108 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2022 line; 59 have a stat line. See the roster

Transfers in 11

The 2022 portal

Transfers out 23

Jeremy Singleton WR★★★to Georgia Southern
Dekalen Goodson TE★★★no new school on file
Gleson Sprewell S★★★no new school on file
Maddox Kopp QB★★★to Colorado
James Faminu OT★★to Temple
Olivier Charles-Pierre DL★★no new school on file
Raylen Sharpe WR★★no new school on file
Terrell Brown RB★★to Trinity Valley C.C.
Alexander Duke DE★★★no new school on file
Amaud Willis-Dalton LB★★★no new school on file
Bryson Smith WR★★★no new school on file
Darius Edmonds WR★★★no new school on file

And 11 more, lower-rated or unrated.

2022 American Athletic Conference standings

TeamConf.OverallAP final
Tulane7–⁠112–⁠29
Cincinnati6–⁠29–⁠4
UCF6–⁠29–⁠5
Houston5–⁠38–⁠5
SMU5–⁠37–⁠6
East Carolina4–⁠48–⁠5
Navy4–⁠44–⁠8
Memphis3–⁠57–⁠6
Tulsa3–⁠55–⁠7
Temple1–⁠73–⁠9
South Florida0–⁠81–⁠11

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.