CollegeFootballDigestfrom CooperSearch

Furman football money

In 2024-25, Furman football brought in $8.4 million and spent $8.4 million, the 12th-most revenue of 122 FCS programs. That’s $2.8 million for each of its 3 wins. 126 players were on the roster, with 16 assistant coaches.

Revenue and expenses

2012: revenue $6.3 million2012: expenses $6.2 million’122013: revenue $6.5 million2013: expenses $6.2 million2014: revenue $6.1 million2014: expenses $5.6 million’142015: revenue $7.0 million2015: expenses $6.2 million2016: revenue $7.1 million2016: expenses $6.7 million’162017: revenue $7.3 million2017: expenses $6.6 million2018: revenue $7.4 million2018: expenses $6.8 million’182019: revenue $6.8 million2019: expenses $6.8 million2020: revenue $6.7 million2020: expenses $6.7 million’202021: revenue $7.3 million2021: expenses $7.3 million2022: revenue $8.1 million2022: expenses $8.1 million’222023: revenue $8.8 million2023: expenses $8.8 million2024: revenue $8.4 million2024: expenses $8.4 million’24

Revenue Expenses (top: $8.8M)

Beside the Southern Conference, 2024-25

1st of 7 in revenue
  1. Furman$8.4M / $8.4M
  2. The Citadel$8.2M / $5.4M
  3. Wofford$7.0M / $7.0M
  4. Samford$6.7M / $6.1M
  5. Chattanooga$6.5M / $6.5M
  6. VMI$5.4M / $5.4M
  7. Western Carolina$3.9M / $3.9M

Each member’s football revenue (the thick bar) and expenses (the thin one under it) that year, as the schools reported them; schools count revenue differently.

Against the Southern

revenue, 2012-13 to 2024-25

  1. Furman

    $8.4M in 24–⁠25

  2. The Citadel

    $8.2M in 24–⁠25

  3. Wofford

    $7.0M in 24–⁠25

  4. Samford

    $6.7M in 24–⁠25

  5. Chattanooga

    $6.5M in 24–⁠25

  6. VMI

    $5.4M in 24–⁠25

  7. Western Carolina

    $3.9M in 24–⁠25

Each program’s football revenue by season, as each school reports it (EADA), on one scale (top: $8.8M), for the programs in the Southern this season, most revenue first; Furman in its color.

By season

SeasonRevenueExpensesRecordSpent a winRankRosterAssistants
2024-25$8.4M$8.4M3–⁠8–⁠1$2.8M12 of 12212616
2023-24$8.8M$8.8M10–⁠3$0.9M8 of 12013412
2022-23$8.1M$8.1M10–⁠3$0.8M9 of 12211510
2021-22$7.3M$7.3M6–⁠5$1.2M9 of 11911410
2020-21$6.7M$6.7M3–⁠4$2.2M3 of 10110810
2019-20$6.8M$6.8M8–⁠5$0.9M11 of 11710410
2018-19$7.4M$6.8M6–⁠4$1.1M6 of 11510710
2017-18$7.3M$6.6M8–⁠5$0.8M7 of 1139910
2016-17$7.1M$6.7M3–⁠8$2.2M6 of 11310310
2015-16$7.0M$6.2M4–⁠7$1.5M5 of 1139810
2014-15$6.1M$5.6M3–⁠9$1.9M11 of 11210710
2013-14$6.5M$6.2M8–⁠5$0.8M6 of 1128910
2012-13$6.3M$6.2M3–⁠8$2.1M6 of 11410310

As Furman University reports them to the US Department of Education under the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act (ope.ed.gov/athletics). Schools count revenue differently (some include institutional support), so compare with care. “Spent a win” is the year’s football expenses over that season’s wins. Rank is football revenue among programs in the same division that season. Browse every school’s in the data.