Kicker, Tulsa, 2017–22
Zack Long
- Number
- No. 90
- Height
- 6′2″
- Weight
- 175 lb
- Class (2022)
- Senior
- Hometown
- Pacific, MO
Zack Long played kicker at Tulsa (2017–22).
Career highs
4field goals, career highat Navy, 2020Kicking
Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls.
On the roster
| Season | Team | No. | Pos | Class | Ht | Wt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Tulsa | 90 | PK | |||
| 2018 | Tulsa | 90 | PK | RS | ||
| 2019 | Tulsa | 90 | PK | Fr. | ||
| 2020 | Tulsa | 90 | PK | So. | ||
| 2021 | Tulsa | 90 | PK | Jr. | ||
| 2022 | Tulsa | 90 | PK | Sr. | 6′2″ | 175 |
As each season’s roster listed the player (CollegeFootballData). Classes before the latest listing are counted back from it; “Yr 1” is the year on file where that count can’t place a season he played (a redshirt, transfer or 2020 year); height and weight as last listed.
Per play
| Season | Team | Plays | EPA/play | Pctile | Median | Total | Usage | PAAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Tulsa | – | – | – | – | – | – | -2.0 (1 att.) |
| 2020 | Tulsa | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.7 (15 att.) |
| 2021 | Tulsa | – | – | – | – | – | – | 13.5 (23 att.) |
| 2022 | Tulsa | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2.9 (20 att.) |
Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). PAAR: points a kicker added above a replacement-level kicker, with his field-goal attempts. From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.
Game by game
2022 Tulsa 12 games, 17 of 20 field goals
| Date | Opponent | Result | FGM | FGA | Long | XP | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3 | at | L 37–40 | 3 | 5 | 32 | 4 | 13 |
| Sep 10 | vs. | W 38–35 | 1 | 2 | 28 | 5 | 8 |
| Sep 17 | vs. | W 54–17 | 1 | 1 | 44 | 7 | 10 |
| Sep 24 | at | L 27–35 | 2 | 2 | 28 | 3 | 9 |
| Oct 1 | vs. | L 21–31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Oct 8 | at | L 21–53 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Oct 21 | at | W 27–16 | 2 | 2 | 39 | 3 | 9 |
| Oct 29 | vs. | L 34–45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Nov 5 | vs. | L 13–27 | 2 | 2 | 46 | 1 | 7 |
| Nov 10 | at | L 10–26 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 1 | 4 |
| Nov 18 | vs. | W 48–42 | 2 | 2 | 25 | 6 | 12 |
| Nov 26 | at | W 37–30 | 3 | 3 | 38 | 4 | 13 |
2021 Tulsa 13 games, 22 of 23 field goals
| Date | Opponent | Result | FGM | FGA | Long | XP | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2 | vs. | L 17–19 | 1 | 1 | 41 | 2 | 5 |
| Sep 11 | at | L 23–28 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 2 | 5 |
| Sep 18 | at | L 20–41 | 2 | 2 | 31 | 2 | 8 |
| Sep 25 | vs. | W 41–34 | 2 | 2 | 45 | 5 | 11 |
| Oct 1 | vs. | L 10–45 | 1 | 1 | 33 | 1 | 4 |
| Oct 9 | vs. | W 35–29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Oct 16 | at | W 32–31 | 2 | 2 | 25 | 2 | 8 |
| Oct 29 | vs. | L 17–20 | 1 | 1 | 26 | 2 | 5 |
| Nov 6 | at | L 20–28 | 2 | 3 | 50 | 0 | 6 |
| Nov 13 | at | W 20–13 | 2 | 2 | 48 | 2 | 8 |
| Nov 20 | vs. | W 44–10 | 3 | 3 | 48 | 5 | 14 |
| Nov 27 | at | W 34–31 | 2 | 2 | 36 | 4 | 10 |
| Dec 20 ✦ | vs. | W 30–17 | 3 | 3 | 35 | 3 | 12 |
2020 Tulsa 8 games, 12 of 15 field goals
| Date | Opponent | Result | FGM | FGA | Long | XP | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3 | at | W 34–26 | 2 | 2 | 34 | 2 | 8 |
| Oct 23 | at | W 42–13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Oct 30 | vs. | W 34–30 | 2 | 2 | 35 | 4 | 10 |
| Nov 14 | vs. | W 28–24 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Nov 19 | vs. | W 30–24 | 1 | 2 | 27 | 3 | 6 |
| Dec 5 | at | W 19–6 | 4 | 4 | 48 | 1 | 13 |
| Dec 19 | at | L 24–27 | 1 | 2 | 43 | 3 | 6 |
| Dec 31 ✦ | vs. | L 26–28 | 2 | 2 | 33 | 2 | 8 |
2019 Tulsa 3 games, 0 of 1 field goal
| Date | Opponent | Result | FGM | FGA | Long | XP | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7 | at | W 34–16 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Oct 5 | at | L 37–43 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 26 | vs. | L 41–42 | – | – | – | – | – |
Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.
Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.
