Tyler Gaffney

Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). Adjusted pass and rush: EPA per play adjusted for the defenses faced (CollegeFootballData’s WEPA). From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.

2013 Stanford 14 games, 1,709 rushing yards, 21 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Car	Yds	TD	Long	Rec	Rec yds
Sep 7	vs.San José State	W 34–⁠13	20	104	2	16	2	20
Sep 14	atArmy	W 34–⁠20	20	132	1	25	1	23
Sep 21	vs.Arizona State	W 42–⁠28	18	87	2	16	1	4
Sep 28	atWashington State	W 55–⁠17	14	54	0	12	1	1
Oct 5	vs.Washington	W 31–⁠28	20	85	1	13	2	12
Oct 12	atUtah	L 21–⁠27	16	108	1	43	1	3
Oct 19	vs.UCLA	W 24–⁠10	36	171	2	16	1	3
Oct 26	atOregon State	W 20–⁠12	22	145	3	32	–	–
Nov 7	vs.Oregon	W 26–⁠20	45	157	1	16	1	15
Nov 16	atUSC	L 17–⁠20	24	158	2	35	1	3
Nov 23	vs.California	W 63–⁠13	16	95	1	58	1	0
Nov 30	vs.Notre Dame	W 27–⁠20	33	189	1	21	1	6
Dec 7	vs.Arizona State	W 38–⁠14	22	133	3	69	1	−2
Jan 1 ✦	vs.Michigan State	L 20–⁠24	24	91	1	47	1	−2

2011 Stanford 13 games, 449 rushing yards, 7 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Car	Yds	TD	Long	Rec	Rec yds
Sep 3	vs.San José State	W 57–⁠3	5	23	1	16	2	12
Sep 10	atDuke	W 44–⁠14	2	5	1	4	1	2
Sep 17	atArizona	W 37–⁠10	3	13	0	6	1	3
Oct 1	vs.UCLA	W 45–⁠19	6	30	1	16	1	7
Oct 8	vs.Colorado	W 48–⁠7	9	61	1	21	1	11
Oct 15	atWashington State	W 44–⁠14	1	3	0	3	–	–
Oct 22	vs.Washington	W 65–⁠21	9	117	1	34	–	–
Oct 29	atUSC	W 56–⁠48	7	36	0	11	2	11
Nov 5	atOregon State	W 38–⁠13	12	56	1	10	–	–
Nov 12	vs.Oregon	L 30–⁠53	4	31	0	10	1	0
Nov 19	vs.California	W 31–⁠28	6	40	1	19	–	–
Nov 26	vs.Notre Dame	W 28–⁠14	6	30	0	15	2	17
Jan 2 ✦	vs.Oklahoma State	L 38–⁠41	4	4	0	5	1	16

2010 Stanford 10 games, 255 rushing yards, 4 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Car	Yds	TD	Long	Rec	Rec yds
Sep 4	vs.Sacramento State	W 52–⁠17	8	33	1	8	–	–
Sep 11	atUCLA	W 35–⁠0	8	28	0	15	–	–
Sep 18	vs.Wake Forest	W 68–⁠24	7	76	2	32	–	–
Sep 25	atNotre Dame	W 37–⁠14	2	15	0	9	–	–
Oct 30	atWashington	W 41–⁠0	13	50	1	11	–	–
Nov 6	vs.Arizona	W 42–⁠17	6	15	0	5	1	5
Nov 13	atArizona State	W 17–⁠13	2	3	0	3	–	–
Nov 20	atCalifornia	W 48–⁠14	4	−2	0	1	–	–
Nov 27	vs.Oregon State	W 38–⁠0	8	27	0	8	2	55
Jan 3 ✦	vs.Virginia Tech	W 40–⁠12	2	10	0	7	–	–

2009 Stanford 9 games, 87 rushing yards, 1 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Car	Yds	TD	Long	Rec	Rec yds
Sep 5	atWashington State	W 39–⁠13	2	8	0	5	–	–
Sep 19	vs.San José State	W 42–⁠17	2	20	0	19	–	–
Sep 26	vs.Washington	W 34–⁠14	6	23	0	16	1	17
Oct 10	atOregon State	L 28–⁠38	1	2	0	2	–	–
Oct 17	atArizona	L 38–⁠43	1	0	0	0	1	22
Oct 24	vs.Arizona State	W 33–⁠14	6	4	0	5	–	–
Nov 14	atUSC	W 55–⁠21	3	9	1	5	–	–
Nov 21	vs.California	L 28–⁠34	1	21	0	21	–	–
Nov 28	vs.Notre Dame	W 45–⁠38	–	–	–	–	–	–

Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.

Combine or pro day: the source doesn’t say which. Combine and pro day results compiled by array-carpenter (nfl-draft-data).