Trevor Wood

Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.

2018 Texas A&M 2 games, 2 catches, 17 yards

Date	Opponent	Result	Rec	Yds	TD	Long	Rush
Sep 8	vs.Clemson	L 26–⁠28	1	8	0	8	–
Nov 17	vs.UAB	W 41–⁠20	1	9	0	9	–

2017 Arizona 4 games, 2 catches, 14 yards, 1 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Rec	Yds	TD	Long	Rush
Oct 14	vs.UCLA	W 47–⁠30	1	6	1	6	–
Nov 18	atOregon	L 28–⁠48	1	8	0	8	–
Nov 25	atArizona State	L 30–⁠42	–	–	–	–	–
Dec 27 ✦	vs.Purdue	L 35–⁠38	–	–	–	–	–

2016 Arizona 7 games, 7 catches, 49 yards

Date	Opponent	Result	Rec	Yds	TD	Long	Rush
Sep 10	vs.Grambling	W 31–⁠21	1	12	0	12	–
Sep 17	vs.Hawai’i	W 47–⁠28	1	8	0	8	–
Sep 24	vs.Washington	L 28–⁠35	1	4	0	4	–
Oct 8	atUtah	L 23–⁠36	2	12	0	8	–
Oct 29	vs.Stanford	L 10–⁠34	–	–	–	–	–
Nov 5	atWashington State	L 7–⁠69	1	9	0	9	3
Nov 12	vs.Colorado	L 24–⁠49	1	4	0	4	–

Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.