Defensive back, Tennessee Tech, 2021–24
Trace Danley
- Number
- No. 9
- Height
- 5′10″
- Weight
- 165 lb
- Class (2024)
- Sophomore
- Hometown
- Irmo, SC
Trace Danley played defensive back at Tennessee Tech (2021–24).
Team titles: Big South–OVC Football Association champions, 2024
Defense
| Season | Team | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | PD | Hur |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021* | Tennessee Tech | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | Tennessee Tech | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 2024 | Tennessee Tech | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Career | 9 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls. * That team-season’s player lines are missing part of the team’s yards in our source, so these numbers may be short.
On the roster
| Season | Team | No. | Pos | Class | Ht | Wt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Tennessee Tech | 9 | DB | Yr 1 | ||
| 2022 | Tennessee Tech | 9 | DB | Yr 2 | ||
| 2024 | Tennessee Tech | 9 | DB | So. (Yr 4) | 5′10″ | 165 |
As each season’s roster listed the player (CollegeFootballData). Classes before the latest listing are counted back from it; “Yr 1” is the year on file where that count can’t place a season he played (a redshirt, transfer or 2020 year); height and weight as last listed.
Game by game
2024 Tennessee Tech 2 games, 4 tackles
| Date | Opponent | Result | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31 | at | L 25–32 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 7 | at | L 3–48 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2022 Tennessee Tech 1 game, 3 tackles
| Date | Opponent | Result | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2 | at | L 10–56 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
No box score in the source for Sep 17 vs. Samford, so that game is not listed.
2021 Tennessee Tech 1 game, 2 tackles
| Date | Opponent | Result | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18 | at | L 0–56 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.
Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.
