Receiver, Louisiana Tech, 2010–11
Taulib Ikharo
- Number
- No. 17
- Height
- 5′11″
- Hometown
- Berkeley, CA
Taulib Ikharo played receiver at Louisiana Tech (2010–11).
Career highs
10catches, career highvs. Navy, 2010105receiving yards, career highvs. New Mexico State, 20113receiving touchdowns, career highvs. Fresno State, 2010Team titles: WAC champions, 2011
Receiving
| Season | Team | Rec | Yds | Avg | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Louisiana Tech | 50 | 530 | 10.6 | 4 | 36 |
| 2011 | Louisiana Tech | 54 | 537 | 9.9 | 4 | 35 |
| Career | 104 | 1,067 | 10.3 | 8 | 36 | |
Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls.
On the roster
| Season | Team | No. | Pos | Ht |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Louisiana Tech | 17 | WR | |
| 2011 | Louisiana Tech | 17 | WR | 5′11″ |
As each season’s roster listed the player (CollegeFootballData). Classes before the latest listing are counted back from it; “Yr 1” is the year on file where that count can’t place a season he played (a redshirt, transfer or 2020 year); height and weight as last listed.
Game by game
2011 Louisiana Tech 13 games, 54 catches, 537 yards, 4 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Rec | Yds | TD | Long | Rush |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3 | at | L 17–19 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 10 | −1 |
| Sep 10 | vs. | W 48–42 | 6 | 67 | 0 | 20 | – |
| Sep 17 | vs. | L 34–35 | 3 | 49 | 0 | 24 | – |
| Sep 24 | at | L 20–26 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 7 | – |
| Oct 1 | vs. | L 26–44 | 3 | 25 | 1 | 14 | – |
| Oct 8 | at | W 24–11 | 4 | 26 | 0 | 12 | – |
| Oct 22 | at | W 24–17 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 6 | – |
| Oct 29 | vs. | W 38–28 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 8 | – |
| Nov 5 | at | W 41–21 | 4 | 40 | 0 | 18 | – |
| Nov 12 | at | W 27–7 | 3 | 34 | 1 | 21 | – |
| Nov 19 | at | W 24–20 | 8 | 90 | 1 | 23 | 6 |
| Nov 26 | vs. | W 44–0 | 8 | 105 | 1 | 35 | – |
| Dec 21 ✦ | vs. | L 24–31 | 4 | 41 | 0 | 26 | – |
2010 Louisiana Tech 12 games, 50 catches, 530 yards, 4 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Rec | Yds | TD | Long | Rush |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4 | vs. | W 20–6 | 2 | 31 | 0 | 25 | – |
| Sep 11 | at | L 16–48 | 4 | 52 | 0 | 36 | – |
| Sep 18 | vs. | L 23–37 | 10 | 88 | 1 | 20 | – |
| Sep 25 | vs. | L 12–13 | 2 | 22 | 0 | 12 | – |
| Oct 2 | at | L 21–41 | 3 | 25 | 0 | 12 | – |
| Oct 9 | vs. | W 24–6 | 3 | 29 | 0 | 14 | – |
| Oct 16 | vs. | W 48–35 | 7 | 62 | 0 | 17 | – |
| Oct 26 | at | L 20–49 | 7 | 45 | 0 | 11 | – |
| Nov 6 | vs. | L 34–40 | 3 | 53 | 3 | 28 | – |
| Nov 13 | at | W 41–20 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 7 | – |
| Nov 27 | at | W 45–38 | 3 | 27 | 0 | 14 | – |
| Dec 4 | vs. | L 17–35 | 4 | 85 | 0 | 36 | – |
Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.
Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.
