
Punter, Wake Forest, 2002–05
Ryan Plackemeier
Wikipedia readers: about 156 a month over the past year
Ryan Plackemeier played punter at Wake Forest (2002–05). He won the 2005 Ray Guy Award. He was a consensus All‑American in 2005. The Seattle Seahawks took Plackemeier in round 7, No. 239 overall in the 2006 NFL Draft.
At a glance
Honors
Punting
| Season | Team | Punts | Yds | Avg | Long | In 20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | Wake Forest | 44 | 1,892 | 43.0 | 69 | 0 |
| 2005 | Wake Forest | 10 | 439 | 43.9 | 60 | 0 |
| On file (2004–05) | 54 | 2,331 | 43.2 | 69 | 0 | |
Kicking
| Season | Team | FGM | FGA | Pct | Long | XP | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | Wake Forest | 4 | 9 | 44.4 | 41 | 11 | 23 |
Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls. Every season here is summed from the game box scores (the source has no season lines for them; a game missing from the box scores is missing here).
Game by game
2005 Wake Forest 1 game, 10 punts, 43.9 average
| Date | Opponent | Result | Punts | Yds | Long | In 20 | FGM | FGA | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15 | at | L 30–35 | 10 | 439 | 60 | 0 | – | – | – |
2004 Wake Forest 7 games, 44 punts, 43.0 average
| Date | Opponent | Result | Punts | Yds | Long | In 20 | FGM | FGA | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11 | at | W 31–17 | 2 | 97 | 49 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Oct 9 | vs. | L 10–17 | 6 | 294 | 62 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 20 |
| Oct 23 | vs. | L 17–20 | 9 | 365 | 54 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 41 |
| Oct 30 | vs. | W 24–22 | 4 | 179 | 57 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 31 |
| Nov 13 | vs. | L 24–31 | 8 | 338 | 59 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 19 |
| Nov 20 | at | L 7–52 | 7 | 274 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 27 | at | L 7–13 | 8 | 345 | 69 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.
Before the draft
| Drill | Combine 2006 |
|---|---|
| Height | 6′3⅜″ |
| Weight | 253 lb |
| Arm length | 30¾″ |
| Hand size | 8½″ |
Combine and pro day results compiled by array-carpenter (nfl-draft-data).
Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.