Houston, 2005–06
Roy Otis
Roy Otis played at Houston (2005–06).
Team titles: Conference USA champions, 2006
Rushing
Receiving
Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls. Every season here is summed from the game box scores (the source has no season lines for them; a game missing from the box scores is missing here). ‡ Short by one game in 2005 (Nov 19 vs. SMU): the source has no box score for it.
Defense before 2016
| Season | G | Solo | Ast | Tkl | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 0 |
| 2006 | 10 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 1 |
| On file | 14 | 9 | 23 | 1 | |
Our box scores carry tackles, tackles for loss and sacks from 2016 only, so these come from other sources: cfbstats.com (Open Data Commons Attribution License), its game lines summed (G: the games he has a line in). A dash: the source has no number for it.
Game by game
2006 Houston 8 games, 42 rushing yards
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Rush yds | Rush TD | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2 | at Rice | W 31–30 | 2 | 8 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Sep 9 | vs. Tulane | W 45–7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Sep 16 | vs. Grambling | W 42–22 | 3 | 14 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Oct 7 | vs. Louisiana | L 28–31 | 1 | 14 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Oct 14 | at Southern Miss | L 27–31 | 1 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Oct 21 | vs. UTEP | W 34–17 | – | – | – | 2 | 13 | 1 |
| Nov 18 | at Memphis | W 23–20 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 0 |
| Dec 29 ✦ | vs. South Carolina | L 36–44 | 1 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – |
2005 Houston 3 games, 2 catches, 3 yards
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Rush yds | Rush TD | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8 | vs.Tulane | W 35–14 | 1 | 3 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Oct 15 | vs.Memphis | L 20–35 | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Oct 22 | at Mississippi State | W 28–16 | – | – | – | 1 | 2 | 0 |
No box score in the source for Nov 19 vs. SMU, so that game is not listed.
Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.
Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.