Wake Forest, 2005–06
Riley Swanson
Riley Swanson played at Wake Forest (2005–06).
Team titles: ACC champions, 2006
Defense
| Season | Team | Int |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Wake Forest | 2 |
| 2006 | Wake Forest | 4 |
| Career | 6 | |
Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls. Every season here is summed from the game box scores (the source has no season lines for them; a game missing from the box scores is missing here). Before 2016 our source records only interceptions for most defenders (no tackles, tackles for loss or sacks), so these lines count interceptions only. His tackles, tackles for loss and sacks from other sources are under “Defense before 2016” below.
Defense before 2016
| Season | G | Solo | Ast | Tkl | TFL | Int | PBU | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 9 | 26 | 11 | 37 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 1 |
| 2006 | 14 | 36 | 17 | 53 | 2 | 4 | 14 | 0 |
| On file | 62 | 28 | 90 | 3 | 6 | 20 | 1 | |
Our box scores carry tackles, tackles for loss and sacks from 2016 only, so these come from other sources: cfbstats.com (Open Data Commons Attribution License), its game lines summed (G: the games he has a line in). A dash: the source has no number for it.
Game by game
2006 Wake Forest 4 games with an interception on file, 4 INT
| Date | Opponent | Result | Int |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16 | at UConn | W 24–13 | 1 |
| Sep 30 | vs. Liberty | W 34–14 | 1 |
| Nov 25 | at Maryland | W 38–24 | 1 |
| Dec 2 | vs. Georgia Tech | W 9–6 | 1 |
2005 Wake Forest 2 games with an interception on file, 2 INT
| Date | Opponent | Result | Int |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15 | at Boston College | L 30–35 | 1 |
| Oct 22 | vs. NC State | W 27–19 | 1 |
Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file. Before 2016 our source’s box scores record only interceptions for defenders (no tackles, tackles for loss or sacks), so only those games are listed. His tackles, tackles for loss and sacks from other sources are under “Defense before 2016” below.
Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.