Running back, St. Thomas (MN) (from Long Island University), 2022–25
Pat Bowen
- Number
- No. 8
- Height
- 5′7″
- Weight
- 189 lb
- Class (2025)
- Senior
- Hometown
- Fort Lauderdale, FL
Pat Bowen played running back at Long Island University (2022–24) and St. Thomas (MN) (2025).
Career highs
121rushing yards, career highat Duquesne, 20222rushing touchdowns, career highat Davidson, 2025Rushing
| Season | Team | Car | Yds | Avg | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Long Island University | 128 | 485 | 3.8 | 5 | 86 |
| 2023 | Long Island University | 50 | 309 | 6.2 | 1 | 71 |
| 2024 | Long Island University | 66 | 374 | 5.7 | 3 | 51 |
| 2025 | St. Thomas (MN) | 89 | 373 | 4.2 | 4 | 49 |
| Career | 333 | 1,541 | 4.6 | 13 | 86 | |
Receiving
| Season | Team | Rec | Yds | Avg | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Long Island University | 15 | 115 | 7.7 | 0 | 29 |
| 2023 | Long Island University | 6 | 71 | 11.8 | 1 | 31 |
| 2024 | Long Island University | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 1 | 24 |
| 2025 | St. Thomas (MN) | 7 | 82 | 11.7 | 2 | 29 |
| Career | 32 | 302 | 9.4 | 4 | 31 | |
Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls.
On the roster
| Season | Team | No. | Pos | Class | Ht | Wt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Long Island University | 8 | RB | Fr. | ||
| 2023 | Long Island University | 8 | RB | So. | ||
| 2024 | Long Island University | 8 | RB | Jr. | ||
| 2025 | St. Thomas (MN) | 8 | RB | Sr. | 5′7″ | 189 |
As each season’s roster listed the player (CollegeFootballData). Classes before the latest listing are counted back from it; “Yr 1” is the year on file where that count can’t place a season he played (a redshirt, transfer or 2020 year); height and weight as last listed.
Per play
| Season | Team | Plays | EPA/play | Pctile | Median | Total | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Long Island University (FCS) | 81 | 0.12 | 42nd (n=470) | 0.14 | 9.8 | 23% |
| 2023 | Long Island University (FCS) | 40 | 0.43 | – | – | 17.2 | 11% |
| 2024 | Long Island University (FCS) | 59 | 0.17 | – | – | 10.3 | 13% |
| 2025 | St. Thomas (MN) (FCS) | 102 | -0.02 | 19th (n=576) | 0.10 | -1.8 | 14% |
Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.
Game by game
2025 St. Thomas (MN) 11 games, 373 rushing yards, 4 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Yds | TD | Long | Rec | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28 | vs. | W 35–13 | 8 | 44 | 0 | 14 | – | – |
| Sep 6 | at | L 30–37 | 9 | 61 | 1 | 38 | 1 | 8 |
| Sep 27 | at | L 27–30 | 11 | 29 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| Oct 4 | vs. | L 14–21 | 12 | 61 | 0 | 23 | – | – |
| Oct 11 | at | W 57–13 | 6 | 62 | 2 | 49 | 1 | 29 |
| Oct 18 | vs. | W 55–17 | 8 | 23 | 1 | 16 | 1 | 4 |
| Oct 25 | at | W 52–10 | 5 | 28 | 0 | 9 | – | – |
| Nov 1 | vs. | W 45–0 | 7 | 23 | 0 | 8 | – | – |
| Nov 8 | at | W 20–13 | 8 | 18 | 0 | 9 | – | – |
| Nov 15 | vs. | L 9–23 | 11 | 28 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 33 |
| Nov 22 | at | L 7–62 | 4 | −4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
2024 Long Island University 9 games, 374 rushing yards, 3 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Yds | TD | Long | Rec | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7 | at | L 0–45 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 4 | – | – |
| Sep 14 | vs. | L 17–20 | 5 | 27 | 0 | 18 | – | – |
| Sep 28 | at | L 10–24 | 7 | 36 | 1 | 25 | 1 | 4 |
| Oct 5 | at | L 21–47 | 4 | 52 | 0 | 48 | – | – |
| Oct 12 | vs. | W 31–7 | 15 | 67 | 1 | 14 | – | – |
| Oct 19 | at | L 31–45 | 6 | 67 | 1 | 48 | – | – |
| Oct 26 | vs. | W 24–21 | 11 | 41 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 26 |
| Nov 9 | at | W 28–7 | 8 | 70 | 0 | 51 | – | – |
| Nov 23 | at | W 35–28 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 4 |
No box score in the source for Nov 16 vs. Saint Francis, so that game is not listed.
2023 Long Island University 8 games, 309 rushing yards, 1 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Yds | TD | Long | Rec | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2 | at | L 10–27 | 5 | 16 | 0 | 6 | – | – |
| Sep 9 | at | L 10–21 | 6 | 24 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 15 |
| Sep 16 | at | L 7–30 | 5 | 32 | 0 | 24 | 1 | −1 |
| Sep 30 | vs. | L 28–31 | 8 | 90 | 1 | 71 | – | – |
| Oct 7 | vs. | W 23–13 | 13 | 74 | 0 | 17 | 2 | 14 |
| Oct 14 | at | L 13–24 | 7 | 27 | 0 | 10 | – | – |
| Oct 26 | at | W 24–23 | 4 | 18 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 12 |
| Nov 4 | atSaint Francis | W 29–28 | 2 | 28 | 0 | 17 | 1 | 31 |
No box score in the source for Oct 21 vs. Merrimack; Nov 11 vs. Wagner; Nov 18 at Stonehill, so those games are not listed.
2022 Long Island University 9 games, 485 rushing yards, 5 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Yds | TD | Long | Rec | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1 | at | L 0–37 | 12 | 38 | 0 | 14 | – | – |
| Sep 17 | at | L 10–63 | 11 | 43 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 5 |
| Sep 24 | vs. | L 29–31 | 12 | 64 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 8 |
| Oct 1 | at | L 23–24 | 12 | 62 | 1 | 86 | 1 | 14 |
| Oct 15 | vs.Saint Francis | L 7–57 | 13 | 46 | 0 | 10 | – | – |
| Oct 21 | at | L 26–37 | 18 | 57 | 1 | 14 | 2 | 12 |
| Oct 29 | at | W 50–48 | 23 | 121 | 1 | 44 | 4 | 49 |
| Nov 5 | vs. | W 29–20 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 12 |
| Nov 12 | vs. | W 34–28 | 17 | 44 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 15 |
Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.
Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.
