Tight end, Utah and Weber State, 2022–26
Noah Bennee
- Number
- No. 89
- Height
- 6′4″
- Weight
- 240 lb
- Class (2026)
- Senior
- Hometown
- Holladay, UT
Noah Bennee plays tight end for Utah, after Utah (2022–23) and Weber State (2024–25). Last time out, at Colorado: 4 catches, 29 yards.
2026 so far
13 catches, 206 yards, 3 TD
Last game: 4 catches, 29 yards at Colorado, W 27–24
Next game: vs. Houston, Oct 24
Filled bars: wins; outlined: losses.
Career highs
6catches, career highvs. Montana, 2025113receiving yards, career highvs. Arkansas, 2026Team titles: Pac-12 champions, 2022
Receiving
* The season in progress, so far.
| Season | Team | Rec | Yds | Avg | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Weber State | 6 | 44 | 7.3 | 1 | 17 |
| 2025 | Weber State | 23 | 264 | 11.5 | 0 | 30 |
| 2026 | Utah | 13 | 206 | 15.8 | 3 | 57 |
| Career | 42 | 514 | 12.2 | 4 | 57 | |
Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls.
On the roster
| Season | Team | No. | Pos | Class | Ht | Wt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Utah | 89 | TE | RS | ||
| 2023 | Utah | 89 | TE | Fr. | ||
| 2024 | Weber State | 89 | TE | So. | ||
| 2025 | Weber State | 89 | TE | Jr. | ||
| 2026 | Utah | 89 | TE | Sr. | 6′4″ | 240 |
As each season’s roster listed the player (CollegeFootballData). Classes before the latest listing are counted back from it; “Yr 1” is the year on file where that count can’t place a season he played (a redshirt, transfer or 2020 year); height and weight as last listed.
Per play
| Season | Team | Plays | EPA/play | Pctile | Median | Total | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Weber State (FCS) | 8 | 0.38 | – | – | 3.0 | – |
| 2025 | Weber State (FCS) | 32 | 0.55 | 65th (n=1040) | 0.46 | 17.5 | 5% |
| 2026 | Utah | 17 | 0.73 | – | – | 12.3 | – |
Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.
Game by game
2026 Utah 5 games, 13 catches, 206 yards, 3 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Rec | Yds | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3 | vs. Idaho | W 66–14 | 1 | 35 | 1 | 35 |
| Sep 12 | vs. Arkansas | W 43–10 | 4 | 113 | 1 | 57 |
| Sep 26 | at Iowa State | W 31–17 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 11 |
| Oct 10 | vs. Kansas | W 41–24 | 2 | 11 | 1 | 6 |
| Oct 17 | at Colorado | W 27–24 | 4 | 29 | 0 | 13 |
2025 Weber State 10 games, 23 catches, 264 yards
| Date | Opponent | Result | Rec | Yds | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30 | at James Madison | L 10–45 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sep 6 | at Arizona | L 3–48 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sep 13 | at McNeese | W 42–41 | 3 | 32 | 0 | 13 |
| Sep 20 | vs. Butler | W 38–24 | 2 | 33 | 0 | 25 |
| Sep 27 | at UC Davis | L 12–34 | 3 | 43 | 0 | 24 |
| Oct 11 | vs. Sacramento State | L 27–55 | 1 | 30 | 0 | 30 |
| Oct 18 | at Portland State | W 43–27 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Oct 25 | vs. Eastern Washington | L 20–23 | 2 | 29 | 0 | 24 |
| Nov 1 | vs. Montana | L 17–38 | 6 | 39 | 0 | 12 |
| Nov 22 | vs. Northern Arizona | W 48–28 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 9 |
2024 Weber State 6 games, 6 catches, 44 yards, 1 TD
Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.
Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.