Running back, Merrimack, 2023–⁠26

Matthias Latham

Number
No. 34
Height
5′10″
Weight
190 lb
Class (2026)
Senior
Hometown
Salem, NH

Matthias Latham plays running back for Merrimack. Last time out, at Dartmouth: 19 carries, 96 yards, 1 TD; 2 catches, 18 yards. Latham leads Merrimack in rushing touchdowns and rushing yards this season.

2026 so far

472 rushing yards, 3 TD

Last game: 19 carries, 96 yards, 1 TD; 2 catches, 18 yards at Dartmouth, L 21–⁠27

Next game: vs. New Hampshire, Oct 24

Game by game this season, rushing yards
  1. 7URI
  2. 17@DEL
  3. 72@ME
  4. 86@TAR
  5. 176NHVN
  6. 18@YALE
  7. 96@DART

Filled bars: wins; outlined: losses.

Career highs

176rushing yards, career highvs. New Haven, 2026

Rushing

Rushing yards, season by season, with his team’s record

* The season in progress, so far.

SeasonTeamCarYdsAvgTDLong
2023Merrimack133.003
2024Merrimack17422.518
2025Merrimack311203.9017
2026Merrimack904725.2364
Career1396374.6464

Receiving

SeasonTeamRecYdsAvgTDLong
2024Merrimack23115.5023
2025Merrimack341.302
2026Merrimack1213311.1040
Career171689.9040

Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls.

On the roster

SeasonTeamNo.PosClassHtWt
2023Merrimack34RBFr.
2024Merrimack34RBSo.
2025Merrimack34RBJr.
2026Merrimack34RBSr.5′10″190

As each season’s roster listed the player (CollegeFootballData). Classes before the latest listing are counted back from it; “Yr 1” is the year on file where that count can’t place a season he played (a redshirt, transfer or 2020 year); height and weight as last listed.

Per play

SeasonTeamPlaysEPA/playPctileMedianTotalUsage
2025Merrimack (FCS)35-0.08––-2.76%
2026Merrimack (FCS)1040.1868th (n=478)0.1018.323%

Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.

Game by game

2026 Merrimack 7 games, 472 rushing yards, 3 TD
DateOpponentResultCarYdsTDLongRecRec yds
Aug 28vs.Rhode IslandL 7–⁠34371326
Sep 3atDelawareL 7–⁠4261709336
Sep 12atMaineW 23–⁠141672017––
Sep 19atTarleton StateL 20–⁠451386032112
Sep 26vs.New HavenW 17–⁠1027176164140
Oct 3atYaleL 24–⁠4161806321
Oct 17atDartmouthL 21–⁠271996116218
2025 Merrimack 8 games, 120 rushing yards
DateOpponentResultCarYdsTDLongRecRec yds
Aug 30atKent StateL 17–⁠211202––
Sep 20vs.Central ConnecticutW 16–⁠14749017––
Oct 4vs.Robert MorrisW 24–⁠772105––
Oct 11vs.MaineL 13–⁠202405––
Oct 18atHarvardL 7–⁠3162801223
Nov 1atColgateL 20–⁠23––––11
Nov 8atNew HavenL 31–⁠41716013––
Nov 22vs.FordhamW 27–⁠261000––
2024 Merrimack 10 games, 42 rushing yards, 1 TD
DateOpponentResultCarYdsTDLongRecRec yds
Aug 31atAir ForceL 6–⁠21380418
Sep 7atUConnL 17–⁠632604––
Sep 14atBucknellW 31–⁠2151508––
Sep 21vs.MaineL 15–⁠261000––
Sep 28vs.DartmouthL 14–⁠161−300––
Oct 12atMorgan StateW 32–⁠241202––
Oct 19vs.StonehillW 48–⁠281303––
Oct 26vs.ColgateW 51–⁠171414––
Nov 2atRobert MorrisL 0–⁠61202––
Nov 16vs.Sacred HeartL 20–⁠311505123
2023 Merrimack 1 game, 3 rushing yards
DateOpponentResultCarYdsTDLongRecRec yds
Nov 4atMassachusettsL 21–⁠311303––

No box score in the source for Oct 21 at Long Island University, so that game is not listed.

Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.

Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.