Matt Joeckel

Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.

2014 TCU 4 games, 134 passing yards, 2 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Cmp	Att	Yds	TD	Int	Rush
Aug 30	vs.Samford	W 48–⁠14	4	8	35	1	1	10
Sep 27	atSMU	W 56–⁠0	5	7	69	1	0	–
Oct 18	vs.Oklahoma State	W 42–⁠9	1	3	5	0	0	1
Oct 25	vs.Texas Tech	W 82–⁠27	2	3	25	0	0	9

2013 Texas A&M 4 games, 293 passing yards, 2 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Cmp	Att	Yds	TD	Int	Rush
Aug 31	vs.Rice	W 52–⁠31	14	19	190	1	0	0
Sep 21	vs.SMU	W 42–⁠13	4	9	63	0	0	–
Oct 19	vs.Auburn	L 41–⁠45	1	3	12	0	0	–
Oct 26	vs.Vanderbilt	W 56–⁠24	3	6	28	1	0	–

2012 Texas A&M 4 games, 42 passing yards

Date	Opponent	Result	Cmp	Att	Yds	TD	Int	Rush
Sep 15	atSMU	W 48–⁠3	2	2	10	0	0	1
Sep 29	vs.Arkansas	W 58–⁠10	1	2	15	0	0	–
Oct 27	atAuburn	W 63–⁠21	0	2	0	0	0	–
Nov 17	vs.Sam Houston	W 47–⁠28	2	5	17	0	0	–

Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.

Combine and pro day results compiled by array-carpenter (nfl-draft-data).