Defensive back, South Carolina State, 2022–26
Marquis Bradley
- Number
- No. 13
- Height
- 6′2″
- Weight
- 190 lb
- Class (2026)
- Senior
- Hometown
- Gaffney, SC
Marquis Bradley plays defensive back for South Carolina State. Last time out, against The Citadel: 1 tackles.
2026 so far
7 tackles
Last game: 1 tackles vs. The Citadel, L 31–34
Next game: vs. Norfolk State, Oct 24
Filled bars: wins; outlined: losses.
Defense
* The season in progress, so far.
| Season | Team | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | PD | Hur |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | South Carolina State | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | South Carolina State | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Career | 14 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls.
On the roster
| Season | Team | No. | Pos | Class | Ht | Wt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | South Carolina State | 13 | DB | RS | ||
| 2023 | South Carolina State | 13 | DB | Fr. | ||
| 2026 | South Carolina State | 13 | DB | Sr. | 6′2″ | 190 |
As each season’s roster listed the player (CollegeFootballData). Classes before the latest listing are counted back from it; “Yr 1” is the year on file where that count can’t place a season he played (a redshirt, transfer or 2020 year); height and weight as last listed.
Game by game
2026 South Carolina State 4 games, 7 tackles
| Date | Opponent | Result | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29 | vs.Savannah State | W 87–0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 19 | at Furman | W 20–17 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 26 | at Bethune-Cookman | W 31–21 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 3 | vs. The Citadel | L 31–34 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2023 South Carolina State 2 games, 7 tackles
| Date | Opponent | Result | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2 | at Charlotte | L 3–24 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 9 | at Georgia Tech | L 13–48 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.
Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.