Quarterback, Texas A&M, 2023–⁠26

Marcel Reed

Number
No. 10
Height
6′1″
Weight
185 lb
Class (2026)
Senior
Hometown
Nashville, TN

Wikipedia readers: about 4,350 a month over the past year

Marcel Reed plays quarterback for Texas A&M. Last time out, against The Citadel: 8 of 13, 130 yards, 1 TD. Reed leads Texas A&M in passing touchdowns and passing yards this season.

2026 so far

1,225 passing yards, 7 TD

Last game: 8 of 13, 130 yards, 1 TD vs. The Citadel, W 41–⁠0

Next game: at Alabama, Oct 24

Game by game this season, passing yards
  1. 233MOST
  2. 163ASU
  3. 236UK
  4. 106@LSU
  5. 170ARK
  6. 187@MIZ
  7. 130CIT

Filled bars: wins; outlined: losses.

At a glance

Best season
3,169
Passing yards, 2025 (Texas A&M, 11–⁠2)
Best game
439 yards
Vs. South Carolina, week 12, 2025: No. 2 passing game in FBS that week

Career highs

439passing yards, career highvs. South Carolina, 20254touchdown passes, career highvs. UTSA, 2025108rushing yards, career highat LSU, 20253rushing touchdowns, career highvs. LSU, 2024

Passing

Passing yards, season by season, with his team’s record

* The season in progress, so far.

SeasonTeamCmpAttPctYdsY/ATDInt
2023Texas A&M213658.337410.411
2024Texas A&M14724061.31,8647.8156
2025Texas A&M23437762.13,1698.42512
2026Texas A&M11220155.71,2256.176
Career51485460.26,6327.84825

Rushing

SeasonTeamCarYdsAvgTDLong
2023Texas A&M13453.5120
2024Texas A&M1165474.7731
2025Texas A&M1044934.7646
2026Texas A&M541753.2240
Career2871,2604.41646

Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls.

On the roster

SeasonTeamNo.PosClassHtWt
2023Texas A&M10QBFr.
2024Texas A&M10QBSo.
2025Texas A&M10QBJr.
2026Texas A&M10QBSr.6′1″185

As each season’s roster listed the player (CollegeFootballData). Classes before the latest listing are counted back from it; “Yr 1” is the year on file where that count can’t place a season he played (a redshirt, transfer or 2020 year); height and weight as last listed.

Per play

SeasonTeamPlaysEPA/playPctileMedianTotalUsageAdj. passAdj. rush
2023Texas A&M490.23––11.426%––
2024Texas A&M3380.2841st (n=238)0.3095.246%0.410.33
2025Texas A&M4760.3579th (n=314)0.24168.653%0.500.34
2026Texas A&M2510.0618th (n=273)0.2115.851%0.100.25

Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). Adjusted pass and rush: EPA per play adjusted for the defenses faced (CollegeFootballData’s WEPA). From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.

Passing detail

SeasonTeamSuccessDepthAfter catchDeep throwsDeep completed
2025Texas A&M48%6.7 yds7.0 yds11 of 14864%
2026Texas A&M40%8.7 yds5.2 yds27 of 19433%

Success: passes that kept the offense on schedule. Depth: how far downfield his passes traveled in the air, on average. After catch: yards his receivers gained after the catch, per completion. Deep throws: the play-by-play gives depth and direction for about half of a passer’s throws; this is how many of those went deep, and how many of the deep ones were caught. From CollegeFootballData, FBS games, 2025 on.

Rushing detail

SeasonTeamSuccessLine yardsSecond levelOpen fieldStuffed
2025Texas A&M48%3.701.601.8018%
2026Texas A&M44%3.201.502.0016%

Where his yards came from, per carry: line yards are the ones credited to the blockers (the first few, and losses), second level the yards 5 to 10 past the line, open field those beyond 10. Success: carries that kept the offense on schedule. Stuffed: carries stopped at or behind the line. From CollegeFootballData, FBS games, 2025 on.

Game by game

2026 Texas A&M 7 games, 1,225 passing yards, 7 TD
DateOpponentResultCmpAttYdsTDIntRush
Sep 5vs.Missouri StateW 50–⁠021302332020
Sep 12vs.Arizona StateW 48–⁠2015251633117
Sep 19vs.KentuckyL 21–⁠3126492361280
Sep 26atLSUL 6–⁠35102610601−13
Oct 3vs.ArkansasW 34–⁠713191700066
Oct 10atMissouriL 6–⁠27193918702−18
Oct 17vs.The CitadelW 41–⁠08131301023
2025 Texas A&M 13 games, 3,169 passing yards, 25 TD
DateOpponentResultCmpAttYdsTDIntRush
Aug 30vs.UTSAW 42–⁠2422342894039
Sep 6vs.Utah StateW 44–⁠2219282203066
Sep 13atNotre DameW 41–⁠4017373602137
Sep 27vs.AuburnW 16–⁠10152220701−23
Oct 4vs.Mississippi StateW 31–⁠913231802130
Oct 11vs.FloridaW 34–⁠1716262341137
Oct 18atArkansasW 45–⁠4223322803055
Oct 25atLSUW 49–⁠25122120222108
Nov 8atMissouriW 38–⁠1720292212029
Nov 15vs.South CarolinaW 31–⁠3022394393213
Nov 22vs.SamfordW 48–⁠01015120304
Nov 28atTexasL 17–⁠2720321800271
Dec 20 ✦vs.MiamiL 3–⁠1025392370227
2024 Texas A&M 11 games, 1,864 passing yards, 15 TD
DateOpponentResultCmpAttYdsTDIntRush
Sep 7vs.McNeeseW 52–⁠10511710043
Sep 14atFloridaW 33–⁠2011171782083
Sep 21vs.Bowling GreenW 26–⁠2016291732091
Sep 28vs.ArkansasW 21–⁠1711221632013
Oct 5vs.MissouriW 41–⁠10–––––−4
Oct 26vs.LSUW 38–⁠2322700062
Nov 2atSouth CarolinaL 20–⁠4418282061146
Nov 16vs.New Mexico StateW 38–⁠320312682141
Nov 23atAuburnL 41–⁠4322352973166
Nov 30vs.TexasL 7–⁠1716231460160
Dec 27 ✦vs.USCL 31–⁠3526422923246
2023 Texas A&M 3 games, 374 passing yards, 1 TD
DateOpponentResultCmpAttYdsTDIntRush
Nov 11vs.Mississippi StateW 51–⁠100200016
Nov 18vs.Abilene ChristianW 38–⁠10111310–
Dec 27 ✦vs.Oklahoma StateL 23–⁠3120333610129

Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.

Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.