Madre London

Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). Adjusted pass and rush: EPA per play adjusted for the defenses faced (CollegeFootballData’s WEPA). From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.

2018 Tennessee 10 games, 206 rushing yards, 3 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Car	Yds	TD	Long	Rec	Rec yds
Sep 1	vs.West Virginia	L 14–⁠40	5	12	0	9	–	–
Sep 8	vs.East Tennessee State	W 59–⁠3	8	47	2	34	–	–
Sep 15	vs.UTEP	W 24–⁠0	9	74	0	28	1	1
Sep 22	vs.Florida	L 21–⁠47	11	66	1	43	–	–
Sep 29	atGeorgia	L 12–⁠38	3	6	0	5	–	–
Oct 13	atAuburn	W 30–⁠24	1	0	0	0	–	–
Oct 20	vs.Alabama	L 21–⁠58	2	−5	0	0	–	–
Nov 3	vs.Charlotte	W 14–⁠3	2	3	0	5	1	4
Nov 10	vs.Kentucky	W 24–⁠7	1	3	0	1	–	–
Nov 17	vs.Missouri	L 17–⁠50	–	–	–	–	–	–

2017 Michigan State 12 games, 304 rushing yards, 3 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Car	Yds	TD	Long	Rec	Rec yds
Sep 2	vs.Bowling Green	W 35–⁠10	10	54	1	11	–	–
Sep 9	vs.Western Michigan	W 28–⁠14	8	28	0	8	1	3
Sep 23	vs.Notre Dame	L 18–⁠38	4	10	0	3	2	7
Sep 30	vs.Iowa	W 17–⁠10	6	4	0	3	–	–
Oct 7	atMichigan	W 14–⁠10	10	59	0	50	2	19
Oct 14	atMinnesota	W 30–⁠27	16	74	1	18	1	5
Oct 21	vs.Indiana	W 17–⁠9	6	13	0	3	1	14
Oct 28	atNorthwestern	L 31–⁠39	3	8	0	5	–	–
Nov 11	atOhio State	L 3–⁠48	4	16	0	7	1	11
Nov 18	vs.Maryland	W 17–⁠7	3	−1	0	1	–	–
Nov 25	atRutgers	W 40–⁠7	9	22	1	6	1	3
Dec 28 ✦	vs.Washington State	W 42–⁠17	4	17	0	10	–	–

2016 Michigan State 8 games, 120 rushing yards, 2 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Car	Yds	TD	Long	Rec	Rec yds
Sep 2	vs.Furman	W 28–⁠13	5	14	0	5	1	15
Sep 24	vs.Wisconsin	L 6–⁠30	1	6	0	6	–	–
Oct 1	atIndiana	L 21–⁠24	7	39	0	24	–	–
Oct 8	vs.BYU	L 14–⁠31	1	4	0	4	–	–
Oct 15	vs.Northwestern	L 40–⁠54	3	6	0	2	–	–
Oct 22	atMaryland	L 17–⁠28	–	–	–	–	–	–
Nov 5	atIllinois	L 27–⁠31	2	−1	0	0	–	–
Nov 12	vs.Rutgers	W 49–⁠0	9	52	2	14	–	–

2015 Michigan State 11 games, 500 rushing yards, 3 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Car	Yds	TD	Long	Rec	Rec yds
Sep 4	atWestern Michigan	W 37–⁠24	13	59	2	24	–	–
Sep 12	vs.Oregon	W 31–⁠28	18	103	0	62	–	–
Sep 19	vs.Air Force	W 35–⁠21	17	40	0	11	–	–
Sep 26	vs.Central Michigan	W 30–⁠10	15	73	1	12	–	–
Oct 3	vs.Purdue	W 24–⁠21	17	97	0	18	1	−1
Oct 10	atRutgers	W 31–⁠24	15	27	0	8	–	–
Nov 14	vs.Maryland	W 24–⁠7	4	6	0	4	–	–
Nov 21	atOhio State	W 17–⁠14	2	4	0	3	–	–
Nov 28	vs.Penn State	W 55–⁠16	1	20	0	20	–	–
Dec 5	vs.Iowa	W 16–⁠13	12	60	0	12	1	14
Dec 31 ✦	vs.Alabama	L 0–⁠38	5	11	0	8	1	10

Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.

Unmarked: Combine and pro day results compiled by array-carpenter (nfl-draft-data); W: Pre-draft measurables: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA).