Running back, Notre Dame, 2018–⁠21

Leo Albano

Number
No. 26
Height
6′1″
Weight
219 lb
Class (2021)
Senior
Hometown
Charleston, SC

Leo Albano played running back at Notre Dame (2018–⁠21).

Rushing

SeasonTeamCarYdsAvgTDLong
2021Notre Dame111.001

Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls.

On the roster

SeasonTeamNo.PosClassHtWt
2018Notre Dame26RBFr.
2019Notre Dame26RBSo.
2020Notre Dame26RBJr.
2021Notre Dame26RBSr.6′1″219

As each season’s roster listed the player (CollegeFootballData). Classes before the latest listing are counted back from it; “Yr 1” is the year on file where that count can’t place a season he played (a redshirt, transfer or 2020 year); height and weight as last listed.

Per play

SeasonTeamPlaysEPA/playPctileMedianTotalUsage
2021Notre Dame1-0.91––-0.9–

Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.

Game by game

2021 Notre Dame 1 game, 1 rushing yard
DateOpponentResultCarYdsTDLong
Nov 20vs.Georgia TechW 55–⁠01101

Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.

Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.