Running back, Lamar (from Rice), 2020–24
Khalan Griffin
- Number
- No. 6
- Height
- 5′10″
- Weight
- 215 lb
- Class (2024)
- Sophomore
- Hometown
- Tyler, TX
Khalan Griffin played running back at Rice (2020–21) and Lamar (2022–24).
Career highs
197rushing yards, career highvs. Mississippi Valley State, 20242rushing touchdowns, career highthree times; last vs. Texas Southern, 2024Rushing
Receiving
Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls.
On the roster
| Season | Team | No. | Pos | Class | Ht | Wt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Rice | 6 | RB | Yr 1 | ||
| 2021 | Rice | 6 | RB | Yr 2 | ||
| 2022 | Lamar | 6 | RB | Yr 3 | ||
| 2023 | Lamar | 6 | RB | Yr 4 | ||
| 2024 | Lamar | 6 | RB | So. (Yr 5) | 5′10″ | 215 |
As each season’s roster listed the player (CollegeFootballData). Classes before the latest listing are counted back from it; “Yr 1” is the year on file where that count can’t place a season he played (a redshirt, transfer or 2020 year); height and weight as last listed.
Per play
| Season | Team | Plays | EPA/play | Pctile | Median | Total | Usage | Adj. rush |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Rice | 76 | -0.14 | 2nd (n=212) | 0.14 | -10.9 | 22% | -0.13 |
| 2021 | Rice | 87 | -0.15 | 1st (n=277) | 0.16 | -13.2 | 15% | 0.02 |
| 2022 | Lamar (FCS) | 103 | 0.13 | 45th (n=470) | 0.14 | 13.5 | 15% | – |
| 2023 | Lamar (FCS) | 162 | 0.03 | 12th (n=450) | 0.17 | 5.2 | 28% | – |
| 2024 | Lamar (FCS) | 198 | 0.23 | 73rd (n=434) | 0.16 | 45.7 | 30% | – |
Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). Adjusted pass and rush: EPA per play adjusted for the defenses faced (CollegeFootballData’s WEPA). From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.
Game by game
2024 Lamar 11 games, 1,158 rushing yards, 7 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Yds | TD | Long | Rec | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31 | at | L 27–34 | 16 | 71 | 0 | 19 | 2 | 6 |
| Sep 7 | vs. | W 28–14 | 23 | 197 | 2 | 28 | 1 | 8 |
| Sep 14 | vs. | W 17–16 | 21 | 91 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 3 |
| Sep 21 | vs. | W 20–17 | 22 | 124 | 2 | 21 | 1 | 9 |
| Sep 28 | at | L 14–34 | 18 | 72 | 1 | 13 | – | – |
| Oct 12 | vs. | L 20–27 | 11 | 59 | 1 | 16 | 2 | 15 |
| Oct 19 | at | W 29–20 | 23 | 158 | 0 | 28 | – | – |
| Oct 26 | at | W 42–10 | 19 | 120 | 1 | 20 | 2 | 16 |
| Nov 2 | vs. | L 27–30 | 29 | 146 | 0 | 22 | – | – |
| Nov 9 | at | L 20–41 | 15 | 34 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 13 |
| Nov 16 | vs. | W 24–7 | 21 | 86 | 0 | 27 | 1 | 4 |
2023 Lamar 11 games, 821 rushing yards, 5 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Yds | TD | Long | Rec | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30 | vs. | L 17–42 | 12 | 42 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 20 |
| Sep 9 | at | L 14–24 | 13 | 45 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 1 |
| Sep 16 | at | L 6–35 | 15 | 61 | 0 | 10 | – | – |
| Sep 23 | vs.Lincoln (CA) | W 38–0 | 12 | 117 | 1 | 40 | 1 | 54 |
| Sep 30 | at | W 21–19 | 17 | 74 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 15 |
| Oct 7 | vs. | W 27–13 | 18 | 93 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 2 |
| Oct 14 | at | W 30–24 | 23 | 71 | 0 | 14 | – | – |
| Oct 28 | vs. | L 7–17 | 16 | 50 | 0 | 8 | – | – |
| Nov 4 | vs. | W 41–21 | 19 | 113 | 1 | 51 | – | – |
| Nov 11 | at | L 24–37 | 10 | 34 | 0 | 12 | – | – |
| Nov 18 | vs. | W 52–27 | 21 | 121 | 1 | 32 | – | – |
2022 Lamar 11 games, 619 rushing yards, 6 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Yds | TD | Long | Rec | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1 | at | L 14–28 | 8 | 39 | 0 | 21 | 1 | 5 |
| Sep 10 | at | L 16–45 | 13 | 31 | 1 | 8 | – | – |
| Sep 17 | vs. | L 14–21 | 10 | 66 | 0 | 10 | – | – |
| Sep 24 | at | L 27–35 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 |
| Oct 1 | vs. | L 34–37 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 3 |
| Oct 8 | at | L 17–56 | 9 | 48 | 0 | 31 | – | – |
| Oct 22 | vs. | L 21–54 | 17 | 114 | 1 | 31 | – | – |
| Oct 29 | vs. | W 24–17 | 17 | 131 | 2 | 35 | – | – |
| Nov 5 | vs. | L 31–47 | 11 | 84 | 1 | 40 | – | – |
| Nov 12 | at | L 14–51 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 3 |
| Nov 19 | at | L 20–24 | 12 | 83 | 1 | 42 | 1 | 11 |
2021 Rice 12 games, 400 rushing yards, 2 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Yds | TD | Long | Rec | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4 | at | L 17–38 | 13 | 35 | 0 | 7 | – | – |
| Sep 11 | vs. | L 7–44 | 19 | 86 | 0 | 21 | – | – |
| Sep 18 | at | L 0–58 | 7 | 52 | 0 | 31 | – | – |
| Sep 25 | vs. | W 48–34 | 5 | 43 | 1 | 36 | – | – |
| Oct 2 | vs. | W 24–19 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 5 | – | – |
| Oct 16 | at | L 0–45 | 9 | 20 | 0 | 8 | – | – |
| Oct 23 | at | W 30–24 | 8 | 21 | 0 | 7 | – | – |
| Oct 30 | vs. | L 24–30 | 14 | 47 | 0 | 9 | – | – |
| Nov 6 | at | L 24–31 | 11 | 14 | 0 | 3 | – | – |
| Nov 13 | vs. | L 21–42 | 8 | 32 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 20 |
| Nov 20 | at | L 28–38 | 12 | 20 | 0 | 5 | – | – |
| Nov 27 | vs. | W 35–31 | 5 | 20 | 0 | 7 | – | – |
2020 Rice 5 games, 242 rushing yards
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Yds | TD | Long | Rec | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24 | vs. | L 34–40 | 7 | 39 | 0 | 20 | – | – |
| Oct 31 | at | W 30–6 | 12 | 41 | 0 | 9 | – | – |
| Nov 21 | at | L 17–27 | 20 | 72 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 45 |
| Dec 5 | at | W 20–0 | 17 | 56 | 0 | 9 | – | – |
| Dec 12 | vs. | L 16–21 | 14 | 34 | 0 | 16 | 1 | 0 |
Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.
Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.
