Josh Grant

Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). PAAR: points a kicker added above a replacement-level kicker, with his field-goal attempts. From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.

2018 Western Michigan 3 games, 1 of 3 field goals

Date	Opponent	Result	FGM	FGA	Long	XP	Pts
Aug 31	vs.Syracuse	L 42–⁠55	0	1	0	6	6
Sep 8	atMichigan	L 3–⁠49	1	1	35	0	3
Sep 15	vs.Delaware State	W 68–⁠0	0	1	0	2	2

2017 Western Michigan 12 games, 15 of 23 field goals

Date	Opponent	Result	FGM	FGA	Long	XP	Pts
Sep 2	atUSC	L 31–⁠49	1	2	43	4	7
Sep 9	atMichigan State	L 14–⁠28	0	0	0	2	2
Sep 16	vs.Idaho	W 37–⁠28	3	3	34	2	11
Sep 23	vs.Wagner	W 49–⁠14	0	0	0	7	7
Sep 30	vs.Ball State	W 55–⁠3	2	2	43	7	13
Oct 7	atBuffalo	W 71–⁠68	1	3	44	6	9
Oct 15	vs.Akron	L 13–⁠14	2	4	49	1	7
Oct 21	atEastern Michigan	W 20–⁠17	2	3	36	2	8
Nov 1	vs.Central Michigan	L 28–⁠35	0	0	0	4	4
Nov 8	vs.Kent State	W 48–⁠20	2	3	42	5	11
Nov 15	atNorthern Illinois	L 31–⁠35	1	2	28	4	7
Nov 24	atToledo	L 10–⁠37	1	1	24	1	4

Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.