Jeffrey Lewis

Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.

2013 Wisconsin 2 games, 2 rushing yards

Date	Opponent	Result	Car	Yds	TD	Long	Rec	Rec yds
Aug 31	vs.Massachusetts	W 45–⁠0	1	0	0	0	–	–
Sep 7	vs.Tennessee Tech	W 48–⁠0	2	2	0	1	–	–

2012 Wisconsin 3 games, 13 rushing yards, 1 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Car	Yds	TD	Long	Rec	Rec yds
Oct 13	atPurdue	W 38–⁠14	1	0	0	0	–	–
Oct 20	vs.Minnesota	W 38–⁠13	1	2	0	2	–	–
Nov 10	atIndiana	W 62–⁠14	2	11	1	6	–	–

2011 Wisconsin 7 games, 187 rushing yards, 1 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Car	Yds	TD	Long	Rec	Rec yds
Sep 1	vs.UNLV	W 51–⁠17	5	24	0	13	–	–
Sep 10	vs.Oregon State	W 35–⁠0	4	26	0	22	–	–
Sep 17	vs.Northern Illinois	W 49–⁠7	4	21	0	10	1	8
Sep 24	vs.South Dakota	W 59–⁠10	5	49	1	41	–	–
Oct 15	vs.Indiana	W 59–⁠7	8	40	0	9	–	–
Nov 5	vs.Purdue	W 62–⁠17	6	16	0	5	1	6
Nov 12	atMinnesota	W 42–⁠13	1	11	0	11	–	–

Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.