Receiver, Texas Tech, 2007–11
Jacoby Franks
- Number
- No. 8
- Height
- 6′0″
- Hometown
- Orange, TX
Jacoby Franks played receiver at Texas Tech (2007–11).
Career highs
9catches, best game on filevs. Texas A&M, 201199receiving yards, best game on filevs. Kansas State, 2009Receiving
| Season | Team | Rec | Yds | Avg | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008* | Texas Tech | 6 | 58 | 9.7 | 0 | 14 |
| 2009 | Texas Tech | 26 | 313 | 12.0 | 2 | 72 |
| 2010 | Texas Tech | 25 | 254 | 10.2 | 0 | 30 |
| 2011 | Texas Tech | 29 | 223 | 7.7 | 1 | 21 |
| On file (2008–11) | 86 | 848 | 9.9 | 3 | 72 | |
Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls. * That team-season’s player lines are missing part of the team’s yards in our source, so these numbers may be short.
Defense before 2016
| Season | G | Solo | Ast | Tkl |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| 2009 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| 2010 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| On file | 8 | 2 | 10 | |
Our box scores carry tackles, tackles for loss and sacks from 2016 only, so these come from other sources: cfbstats.com (Open Data Commons Attribution License), its game lines summed (G: the games he has a line in). A dash: the source has no number for it.
On the roster
| Season | Team | No. | Pos | Ht |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Texas Tech | 8 | WR | |
| 2009 | Texas Tech | 8 | WR | |
| 2010 | Texas Tech | 8 | WR | |
| 2011 | Texas Tech | 8 | WR | 6′0″ |
As each season’s roster listed the player (CollegeFootballData). Classes before the latest listing are counted back from it; “Yr 1” is the year on file where that count can’t place a season he played (a redshirt, transfer or 2020 year); height and weight as last listed.
Game by game
2011 Texas Tech 8 games, 29 catches, 223 yards, 1 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Rec | Yds | TD | Long | Rush |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17 | at New Mexico | W 59–13 | 2 | 34 | 0 | 20 | – |
| Sep 24 | vs. Nevada | W 35–34 | 5 | 54 | 0 | 20 | – |
| Oct 1 | at Kansas | W 45–34 | 3 | 29 | 1 | 13 | – |
| Oct 8 | vs. Texas A&M | L 40–45 | 9 | 63 | 0 | 21 | – |
| Nov 5 | at Texas | L 20–52 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 9 | – |
| Nov 12 | vs. Oklahoma State | L 6–66 | 4 | 13 | 0 | 11 | – |
| Nov 19 | at Missouri | L 27–31 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 5 | – |
| Nov 26 | vs. Baylor | L 42–66 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 7 | – |
2010 Texas Tech 6 games, 25 catches, 254 yards
| Date | Opponent | Result | Rec | Yds | TD | Long | Rush |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5 | vs. SMU | W 35–27 | 6 | 31 | 0 | 11 | – |
| Sep 11 | atNew Mexico | W 52–17 | 5 | 58 | 0 | 30 | −2 |
| Sep 18 | vs.Texas | L 14–24 | 3 | 39 | 0 | 19 | – |
| Oct 2 | at Iowa State | L 38–52 | 4 | 46 | 0 | 22 | – |
| Oct 9 | vs.Baylor | W 45–38 | 3 | 46 | 0 | 16 | – |
| Oct 16 | vs.Oklahoma State | L 17–34 | 4 | 34 | 0 | 20 | – |
2009 Texas Tech 11 games, 26 catches, 313 yards, 2 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Rec | Yds | TD | Long | Rush |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5 | vs. North Dakota | W 38–13 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 14 | – |
| Sep 12 | vs. Rice | W 55–10 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 6 | – |
| Sep 19 | atTexas | L 24–34 | 4 | 35 | 0 | 11 | – |
| Sep 26 | at Houston | L 28–29 | 3 | 26 | 0 | 16 | – |
| Oct 3 | vs.New Mexico | W 48–28 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 10 | – |
| Oct 10 | vs. Kansas State | W 66–14 | 3 | 99 | 1 | 72 | – |
| Oct 17 | at Nebraska | W 31–10 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 18 | – |
| Oct 24 | vs.Texas A&M | L 30–52 | 3 | 29 | 0 | 12 | – |
| Oct 31 | vs.Kansas | W 42–21 | 4 | 38 | 0 | 16 | – |
| Nov 14 | atOklahoma State | L 17–24 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9 | – |
| Jan 2 ✦ | vs. Michigan State | W 41–31 | 2 | 19 | 1 | 14 | – |
2008 Texas Tech 4 games, 6 catches, 58 yards
| Date | Opponent | Result | Rec | Yds | TD | Long | Rush |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4 | atKansas State | W 58–28 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 9 | – |
| Oct 18 | atTexas A&M | W 43–25 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 13 | – |
| Oct 25 | atKansas | W 63–21 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 14 | – |
| Nov 8 | vs.Oklahoma State | W 56–20 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 11 | – |
Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.
Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.