Punter, North Carolina, 2009–10
Grant Schallock
- Number
- No. 39
- Height
- 6′7″
- Hometown
- Webster, NC
Grant Schallock played punter at North Carolina (2009–10).
Punting
| Season | Team | Punts | Yds | Avg | Long | In 20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | North Carolina | 65 | 2,621 | 40.3 | 55 | 0 |
| 2010 | North Carolina | 9 | 398 | 44.2 | 54 | 0 |
| Career | 74 | 3,019 | 40.8 | 55 | 0 | |
Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls.
On the roster
| Season | Team | No. | Pos | Ht |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | North Carolina | 39 | P | |
| 2010 | North Carolina | 39 | P | 6′7″ |
As each season’s roster listed the player (CollegeFootballData). Classes before the latest listing are counted back from it; “Yr 1” is the year on file where that count can’t place a season he played (a redshirt, transfer or 2020 year); height and weight as last listed.
Game by game
2010 North Carolina 3 games, 9 punts, 44.2 average
| Date | Opponent | Result | Punts | Yds | Long | In 20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4 | vs. | L 24–30 | 7 | 313 | 54 | 0 |
| Sep 18 | vs. | L 24–30 | 1 | 45 | 45 | 0 |
| Sep 25 | at | W 17–13 | 1 | 40 | 40 | 0 |
2009 North Carolina 13 games, 65 punts, 40.3 average
| Date | Opponent | Result | Punts | Yds | Long | In 20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5 | vs. | W 40–6 | 3 | 123 | 52 | 0 |
| Sep 12 | at | W 12–10 | 6 | 244 | 45 | 0 |
| Sep 19 | vs. | W 31–17 | 4 | 125 | 38 | 0 |
| Sep 26 | at | L 7–24 | 5 | 236 | 55 | 0 |
| Oct 3 | vs. | L 3–16 | 8 | 343 | 54 | 0 |
| Oct 10 | vs. | W 42–12 | 6 | 261 | 49 | 0 |
| Oct 22 | vs. | L 27–30 | 5 | 227 | 51 | 0 |
| Oct 29 | at | W 20–17 | 5 | 198 | 47 | 0 |
| Nov 7 | vs. | W 19–6 | 3 | 109 | 48 | 0 |
| Nov 14 | vs. | W 33–24 | 6 | 231 | 46 | 0 |
| Nov 21 | at | W 31–13 | 7 | 236 | 41 | 0 |
| Nov 28 | at | L 27–28 | 4 | 164 | 53 | 0 |
| Dec 26 ✦ | vs. | L 17–19 | 3 | 124 | 49 | 0 |
Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.
Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.
