Running back, Louisville, to 2004
Eric Shelton
Eric Shelton played running back at Louisville (to 2004). The Carolina Panthers took Shelton in round 2, No. 54 overall in the 2005 NFL Draft.
Career highs
158rushing yards, best game on filevs. Cincinnati, 20045rushing touchdowns, best game on filevs. East Carolina, 2004Team titles: Conference USA champions, 2004
Rushing
| Season | Team | Car | Yds | Avg | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | Louisville | 146 | 938 | 6.4 | 20 | 80 |
Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls. Every season here is summed from the game box scores (the source has no season lines for them; a game missing from the box scores is missing here).
Game by game
2004 Louisville 12 games, 938 rushing yards, 20 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Yds | TD | Long | Rec | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5 | vs. | W 28–0 | 10 | 39 | 0 | 12 | – | – |
| Sep 11 | at | W 52–21 | 6 | 42 | 0 | 16 | 1 | 3 |
| Sep 25 | at | W 34–0 | 13 | 86 | 3 | 37 | – | – |
| Oct 2 | vs. | W 59–7 | 12 | 129 | 5 | 67 | – | – |
| Oct 14 | at | L 38–41 | 11 | 47 | 0 | 17 | 1 | 1 |
| Oct 22 | vs. | W 41–9 | 8 | 23 | 1 | 12 | – | – |
| Nov 4 | at | W 56–49 | 14 | 136 | 4 | 78 | – | – |
| Nov 10 | vs. | W 55–28 | 10 | 57 | 0 | 16 | 1 | 3 |
| Nov 20 | at | W 65–27 | 16 | 87 | 3 | 23 | 1 | 11 |
| Nov 27 | vs. | W 70–7 | 10 | 158 | 1 | 80 | 1 | 8 |
| Dec 4 | at | W 55–7 | 18 | 58 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 9 |
| Dec 31 ✦ | vs. | W 44–40 | 18 | 76 | 1 | 9 | – | – |
Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.
Before the draft
| Drill | Combine or pro day 2005 |
|---|---|
| Height | 6′1½″ |
| Weight | 246 lb |
| Arm length | 33⅝″ |
| Hand size | 9½″ |
| 40-yard dash | 4.53 s |
| 10-yard split | 1.64 s |
| Vertical jump | 38½″ |
| Broad jump | 10′4″ |
| Bench press | 18 reps |
| 3-cone drill | 7.46 s |
| 20-yard shuttle | 4.08 s |
Combine or pro day: the source doesn’t say which. Pre-draft measurables: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA).
Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.
