Running back, TCU (from Arkansas), 2020–24
Dominique Johnson
- Number
- No. 20
- Height
- 6′1″
- Weight
- 230 lb
- Class (2024)
- Junior
- Hometown
- Crowley, TX
Dominique Johnson played running back at Arkansas (2020–23) and TCU (2024).
Career highs
107rushing yards, career highvs. Mississippi State, 20212rushing touchdowns, career highvs. Mississippi State, 2021Rushing
Receiving
Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls.
On the roster
| Season | Team | No. | Pos | Class | Ht | Wt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Arkansas | 20 | RB | Yr 1 | ||
| 2021 | Arkansas | 20 | RB | Yr 2 | ||
| 2022 | Arkansas | 20 | RB | Yr 3 | ||
| 2023 | Arkansas | 20 | RB | Yr 4 | ||
| 2024 | TCU | 20 | RB | Jr. (Yr 5) | 6′1″ | 230 |
As each season’s roster listed the player (CollegeFootballData). Classes before the latest listing are counted back from it; “Yr 1” is the year on file where that count can’t place a season he played (a redshirt, transfer or 2020 year); height and weight as last listed.
Per play
| Season | Team | Plays | EPA/play | Pctile | Median | Total | Usage | Adj. rush |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Arkansas | 96 | 0.23 | 69th (n=277) | 0.16 | 21.9 | 12% | 0.28 |
| 2022 | Arkansas | 8 | 0.27 | – | – | 2.2 | – | – |
| 2023 | Arkansas | 33 | 0.25 | – | – | 8.2 | 6% | – |
| 2024 | TCU | 19 | 0.09 | – | – | 1.7 | – | – |
Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). Adjusted pass and rush: EPA per play adjusted for the defenses faced (CollegeFootballData’s WEPA). From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.
Game by game
2024 TCU 7 games, 63 rushing yards, 1 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Yds | TD | Long | Rec | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30 | at | W 34–27 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | – | – |
| Sep 7 | vs. | W 45–0 | 7 | 26 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 2 |
| Sep 14 | vs. | L 34–35 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 10 | – | – |
| Sep 21 | at | L 42–66 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 5 | – | – |
| Sep 28 | vs. | W 38–27 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | – | – |
| Nov 9 | vs. | W 38–13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – |
| Nov 23 | vs. | W 49–28 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 7 | – | – |
2023 Arkansas 9 games, 167 rushing yards, 1 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Yds | TD | Long | Rec | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2 | vs. | W 56–13 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 7 | – | – |
| Sep 9 | vs. | W 28–6 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 4 | – | – |
| Sep 16 | vs. | L 31–38 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 13 | 1 | −2 |
| Sep 23 | at | L 31–34 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | – | – |
| Sep 30 | vs. | L 22–34 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | – | – |
| Oct 14 | at | L 21–24 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | – | – |
| Oct 21 | vs. | L 3–7 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| Nov 18 | vs. | W 44–20 | 6 | 62 | 1 | 31 | – | – |
| Nov 24 | vs. | L 14–48 | 5 | 55 | 0 | 41 | – | – |
2022 Arkansas 3 games, 43 rushing yards
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Yds | TD | Long | Rec | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24 | vs. | L 21–23 | 5 | 32 | 0 | 12 | – | – |
| Oct 1 | vs. | L 26–49 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 6 | – | – |
| Oct 8 | at | L 17–40 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – |
2021 Arkansas 13 games, 575 rushing yards, 7 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Yds | TD | Long | Rec | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4 | vs. | W 38–17 | 4 | 16 | 1 | 7 | – | – |
| Sep 11 | vs. | W 40–21 | 6 | 44 | 1 | 19 | – | – |
| Sep 18 | vs. | W 45–10 | 5 | 72 | 1 | 48 | – | – |
| Sep 25 | vs. | W 20–10 | 6 | 19 | 0 | 16 | – | – |
| Oct 2 | at | L 0–37 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 4 | – | – |
| Oct 9 | at | L 51–52 | 4 | 19 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 11 |
| Oct 16 | vs. | L 23–38 | 6 | 42 | 1 | 17 | 2 | 16 |
| Oct 23 | vs. | W 45–3 | 6 | 91 | 0 | 34 | – | – |
| Nov 6 | vs. | W 31–28 | 17 | 107 | 2 | 24 | 1 | 7 |
| Nov 13 | at | W 16–13 | 15 | 40 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 40 |
| Nov 20 | at | L 35–42 | 9 | 23 | 1 | 12 | – | – |
| Nov 26 | vs. | W 34–17 | 6 | 19 | 0 | 11 | – | – |
| Jan 1 ✦ | vs. | W 24–10 | 11 | 77 | 0 | 25 | 1 | −3 |
Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.
Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.
